More GTA Uproar

Cuban American Bar Association Condemns Racially Charged Video Game (thanks Chris Johnson and Gamasutra (registration required)) has word of the latest unhappy reaction to Grand Theft Auto: Vice City, as the Cuban American Bar Association (CABA) has sent a letter "to the manufacturers of the video game... condemning the game's use of racially charged remarks promoting the hate and killing of Haitians and Cubans," demanding an apology to each group. They copy U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft and Florida Governor Jeb Bush , as they are also "seeking the removal of the offensive video game from store shelves throughout the country." Finally: "CABA's letter quotes the Haitian government spokesperson, Mr. Mario Dupuy, who stated, 'this racist game is psychologically extremely dangerous and is an incitement to genocide.'"
View : : :
43.
 
Re: No subject
Jan 24, 2004, 06:07
43.
Re: No subject Jan 24, 2004, 06:07
Jan 24, 2004, 06:07
 
#37 ChangKhan

No, Bush and his cronies may not be uber-liberals but the people who bring things like this are - which makes Bush and Co a bunch of band wagon jumpers (they wouldn't bat an eye lid had the uber liberals not piped up)

The FACT is that movements like CABA could use their time and money better by fighting the inadiquacies in the social system or helping the deprived people they represent - instead of bitching about a line in a game that nobody cared about until the PC police jumped in.

Did any groups pipe up about the racist commnets in Romper Stomper about the Chinese or the racism displayed in American History X, is anyone trying to get Scarface banned, is the Godfather series inciting genocide (apart from part 3 which could drive a few people to murder should they be brave enough to watch it!) - no because they were all taken in context. So why is this any different?

Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jan 23, 2004Jan 23 2004
6.
Jan 23, 2004Jan 23 2004
18.
Jan 23, 2004Jan 23 2004
19.
Jan 23, 2004Jan 23 2004
21.
Jan 23, 2004Jan 23 2004
25.
Jan 23, 2004Jan 23 2004
2.
Jan 23, 2004Jan 23 2004
22.
Jan 23, 2004Jan 23 2004
3.
Jan 23, 2004Jan 23 2004
4.
Jan 23, 2004Jan 23 2004
7.
Jan 23, 2004Jan 23 2004
8.
Jan 23, 2004Jan 23 2004
9.
Jan 23, 2004Jan 23 2004
10.
Jan 23, 2004Jan 23 2004
11.
Jan 23, 2004Jan 23 2004
13.
Jan 23, 2004Jan 23 2004
15.
Jan 23, 2004Jan 23 2004
    Hrm.
12.
Jan 23, 2004Jan 23 2004
14.
Jan 23, 2004Jan 23 2004
16.
Jan 23, 2004Jan 23 2004
17.
Jan 23, 2004Jan 23 2004
20.
Jan 23, 2004Jan 23 2004
 Bah
23.
Jan 23, 2004Jan 23 2004
24.
Jan 23, 2004Jan 23 2004
26.
Jan 23, 2004Jan 23 2004
28.
Jan 23, 2004Jan 23 2004
29.
Jan 23, 2004Jan 23 2004
31.
Jan 23, 2004Jan 23 2004
37.
Jan 24, 2004Jan 24 2004
 43.
Jan 24, 2004Jan 24 2004
     Re: No subject
27.
Jan 23, 2004Jan 23 2004
30.
Jan 23, 2004Jan 23 2004
32.
Jan 23, 2004Jan 23 2004
34.
Jan 24, 2004Jan 24 2004
47.
Jan 24, 2004Jan 24 2004
48.
Jan 24, 2004Jan 24 2004
49.
Jan 24, 2004Jan 24 2004
    Dumb line
33.
Jan 24, 2004Jan 24 2004
35.
Jan 24, 2004Jan 24 2004
36.
Jan 24, 2004Jan 24 2004
38.
Jan 24, 2004Jan 24 2004
39.
Jan 24, 2004Jan 24 2004
40.
Jan 24, 2004Jan 24 2004
41.
Jan 24, 2004Jan 24 2004
46.
Jan 24, 2004Jan 24 2004
42.
Jan 24, 2004Jan 24 2004
44.
Jan 24, 2004Jan 24 2004
45.
Jan 24, 2004Jan 24 2004
50.
Jan 24, 2004Jan 24 2004
51.
Jan 24, 2004Jan 24 2004
52.
Jan 24, 2004Jan 24 2004
54.
Jan 24, 2004Jan 24 2004
55.
Jan 24, 2004Jan 24 2004
58.
Jan 25, 2004Jan 25 2004
59.
Jan 25, 2004Jan 25 2004
60.
Jan 26, 2004Jan 26 2004
53.
Jan 24, 2004Jan 24 2004
56.
Jan 24, 2004Jan 24 2004
57.
Jan 25, 2004Jan 25 2004