" You are presuming that the man that was searched was guilty. What if he is innocent? Should he not be PRESUMED innocent? "
No, he is presuming the dude was part of a criminal investigation, in which his computers may be, or contain evidence. Think of it this way: Man stabs you. The only proof other than "you say x, he says y" is the knife in question. This knife is the property of the alleged assailant. What do the cops do? Tell the dude he stands to be investigated for the crime, but leave the knife in his possession? Or what about pot growers? When the cops raid a grow op, they do not leave the lights, ballasts, hydroponic equipment pending trial... they take it all. Even when the growers are presumed innocent (which they are untill proven otherwise).
Seizing possible evidence in a criminal investigation, regardless of the fact the possible evidence belongs to a presumed innocent man (which, since the dude isn't in jail, he is), is standard operating procedure for law enforcement. Get over it.
We cannot eat solar panels, nor solar power.
We cannot eat wind power, nor wind turbines.
92% of the world relies on eating oil, via fertilizer, pesticides, transport, and irrigation.
How long until oil is too valuble for farming?
STAY RIGHT WHERE YOU ARE, GET OUT OF THAT BED AND GET DOWN ON THE FLOOR, GET OUTSIDE RIGHT NOW, RIGHT HERE: GET DOWN ON THE CEMENT, I DONT CARE IF YOU'RE NUDE, GET DOWN ON THE CEMENT, I DON'T CARE IF ITS FREEZING! WHERES THE DRUGS, WE KNOW YOU GOT THE DRU