Thief: Deadly Shadows?

If the EBGames listing is correct for Thief: Deadly Shadows, then a new title for ION Storm's upcoming installment in the stealthy Thief series previously known as Thief III has been unveiled (thanks GameSpot). This change has not been confirmed, but EBGames has been correct about such revelations in the past, and the break from sequel naming conventions is consistent with ION's recent Deus Ex: Invisible War.
View : : :
33.
 
Re: No subject
Jan 14, 2004, 17:48
33.
Re: No subject Jan 14, 2004, 17:48
Jan 14, 2004, 17:48
 
Enjoy getting KOTOR 6 months after I had it? ;-)

Since I got to play it at 1600x1200 with 6xFSAA and in Dolby 5.1, yeah, pretty much. Heart of the Guardian rules too, btw.
Oh, and how are the fixes to the bugs in the Xbox version coming along?

Ion Storm abandoning the PC? Probably so, many developers eventually ditch the one platform that got them to where they are now, so it wouldn't surprise me. Whether that is something Xbox fans should be HAPPY about is up to them. You liked IW, good for you. Compare it to the original, and it reeks of Hollywood Regurgitated Vomit Syndrome. (ie, the original was approximately 20 times better than the sequel)

As for Thief 3, we'll see. I would have gotten it the second it came out, but since they botched up DX:IW so badly, AND since Thief 3 will be running with the same limp, fucked up engine, I'm going to be a bit more conservative. It's bad enough that Deus Ex has now been tarnished forever, I don't really want to see Thief go the same way.

I will agree that PC developers now draw a lot of crap online, and that it seems that nothing but negativity is flung in their direction. However, if said PC developers would take the fucking time to make sure their product actually WORKS before releasing it, so that they wouldn't have to PATCH it within 0.04 seconds of release, maybe they might catch a little bit less flack?

I'm sure that all the Xbox owners for whom DX:IW crashes frequently are VERRRRRRRRRRRY happy with Ion Storm's wonderful Quality Assurance.

Creston

Edit : If the game is so bad, then why does it continue to garner plenty of positive reviews?

There is a difference between "positive reviews" that rank around 80% (source, gamerankings.com, pc version averages 82% ), and getting GREAT reviews that consistently clock in well over 90%. Let's not forget that the original received over FIFTY Game Of The Year awards. We simply expected more, and we certainly expected more than a gimped Xbox port. Small levels my ass.

This comment was edited on Jan 14, 17:56.
Avatar 15604
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jan 13, 2004Jan 13 2004
2.
Jan 13, 2004Jan 13 2004
3.
Jan 13, 2004Jan 13 2004
5.
Jan 14, 2004Jan 14 2004
6.
Jan 14, 2004Jan 14 2004
8.
Jan 14, 2004Jan 14 2004
4.
Jan 14, 2004Jan 14 2004
7.
Jan 14, 2004Jan 14 2004
9.
Jan 14, 2004Jan 14 2004
10.
Jan 14, 2004Jan 14 2004
11.
Jan 14, 2004Jan 14 2004
12.
Jan 14, 2004Jan 14 2004
13.
Jan 14, 2004Jan 14 2004
14.
Jan 14, 2004Jan 14 2004
15.
Jan 14, 2004Jan 14 2004
16.
Jan 14, 2004Jan 14 2004
17.
Jan 14, 2004Jan 14 2004
18.
Jan 14, 2004Jan 14 2004
 33.
Jan 14, 2004Jan 14 2004
   Re: No subject
37.
Jan 14, 2004Jan 14 2004
38.
Jan 14, 2004Jan 14 2004
     Re: No subject
40.
Jan 14, 2004Jan 14 2004
      Re: No subject
42.
Jan 15, 2004Jan 15 2004
       Re: No subject
45.
Jan 15, 2004Jan 15 2004
        Re: No subject
46.
Jan 17, 2004Jan 17 2004
         Re: No subject
47.
Jan 17, 2004Jan 17 2004
       Re: No subject
41.
Jan 14, 2004Jan 14 2004
43.
Jan 15, 2004Jan 15 2004
     Re: No subject
44.
Jan 15, 2004Jan 15 2004
      Re: No subject
39.
Jan 14, 2004Jan 14 2004
   Sigh...
19.
Jan 14, 2004Jan 14 2004
20.
Jan 14, 2004Jan 14 2004
21.
Jan 14, 2004Jan 14 2004
22.
Jan 14, 2004Jan 14 2004
23.
Jan 14, 2004Jan 14 2004
24.
Jan 14, 2004Jan 14 2004
25.
Jan 14, 2004Jan 14 2004
26.
Jan 14, 2004Jan 14 2004
27.
Jan 14, 2004Jan 14 2004
28.
Jan 14, 2004Jan 14 2004
29.
Jan 14, 2004Jan 14 2004
30.
Jan 14, 2004Jan 14 2004
31.
Jan 14, 2004Jan 14 2004
32.
Jan 14, 2004Jan 14 2004
34.
Jan 14, 2004Jan 14 2004
35.
Jan 14, 2004Jan 14 2004
36.
Jan 14, 2004Jan 14 2004