Consolidation

View : : :
11.
 
Re: No subject
Jan 13, 2004, 21:24
11.
Re: No subject Jan 13, 2004, 21:24
Jan 13, 2004, 21:24
 
I tell you what I think:

I have some sort of "gamer's A.D.D.". I rarely play the games I buy for more than 20 hours, and I'm always buying new ones. For $50 a game, that's a lot. If this service works the way its intended, I'd have a better bang per buck ratio, and over time Id beat the system cost overhead.

To me, if it works as it should, I may actually consider getting one. Depends on the titles, though.

Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jan 13, 2004Jan 13 2004
2.
Jan 13, 2004Jan 13 2004
3.
Jan 13, 2004Jan 13 2004
4.
Jan 13, 2004Jan 13 2004
5.
Jan 13, 2004Jan 13 2004
6.
Jan 13, 2004Jan 13 2004
7.
Jan 13, 2004Jan 13 2004
8.
Jan 13, 2004Jan 13 2004
      Re: Still a con ?
9.
Jan 13, 2004Jan 13 2004
       Re: Still a con ?
10.
Jan 13, 2004Jan 13 2004
        No subject
 11.
Jan 13, 2004Jan 13 2004
         Re: No subject