15.
 
Re: MS Support in Win98SE
Jan 13, 2004, 10:10
15.
Re: MS Support in Win98SE Jan 13, 2004, 10:10
Jan 13, 2004, 10:10
 
NT was intended a business OS yes, but that still didn't mean that most businesses actually ran it on the average workstation. In my experience, most business computers ran 98 at the time.

The real reason why Joe off the street hasn't upgraded is that they don't care enough to spend the time or money to upgrade. Those who want to upgrade but haven't, have held back because of compatibility.

I agree 98 should be put to rest, and most people like XP, it certainly doesn't have the bad name ME has - most people praise it, sugarman is in the vast minority.

As for sugarman, if half your machines can't run XP properly, you should either
a) stop buying those $299 machines or
b) pay someone who knows how to do a virus scan/spyware cleaning/driver update.

Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jan 12, 2004Jan 12 2004
2.
Jan 12, 2004Jan 12 2004
5.
Jan 12, 2004Jan 12 2004
6.
Jan 12, 2004Jan 12 2004
9.
Jan 12, 2004Jan 12 2004
12.
Jan 13, 2004Jan 13 2004
13.
Jan 13, 2004Jan 13 2004
10.
Jan 12, 2004Jan 12 2004
11.
Jan 12, 2004Jan 12 2004
8.
Jan 12, 2004Jan 12 2004
14.
Jan 13, 2004Jan 13 2004
 15.
Jan 13, 2004Jan 13 2004
   Re: MS Support in Win98SE
16.
Jan 13, 2004Jan 13 2004
17.
Jan 13, 2004Jan 13 2004
18.
Jan 13, 2004Jan 13 2004
19.
Jan 13, 2004Jan 13 2004
20.
Jan 13, 2004Jan 13 2004
21.
Jan 14, 2004Jan 14 2004
22.
Jan 14, 2004Jan 14 2004
         Re: MS Support in Win98SE
23.
Jan 14, 2004Jan 14 2004
          Re: MS Support in Win98SE
24.
Jan 14, 2004Jan 14 2004
           Re: MS Support in Win98SE
25.
Jan 14, 2004Jan 14 2004
            Re: MS Support in Win98SE
26.
Jan 14, 2004Jan 14 2004
             Re: MS Support in Win98SE
7.
Jan 12, 2004Jan 12 2004