20.
 
Re: ?
Jan 5, 2004, 21:13
20.
Re: ? Jan 5, 2004, 21:13
Jan 5, 2004, 21:13
 
23fps is 23% more, that's helluva big difference for card in the same price range, hell radeon 9800 out done FX 5950 and it's 100 bucks cheaper.
Ok, I'm sorry for taking things other than pure performance into account when talking about video cards, how ungeeky of me. I'll do my best to only consider numbers next time.
You must be some nvidia fan or some shit.
Once again I'm sorry for prefering quality over quantity. Those extra 23 obsolete FPS don't mean jack if it takes 59032 bajillion (obviously exaggerated) workarounds to get the game to run stably in the first place. And before anyone retorts with, "omg nvidia fanboy ATI's drivers pwn you," I speak only from personal experience, I don't give a damn how far ATI's drivers have come, the day I stop seeing "Fixed crash in [insert name of popular game here]" in ATI's driver releases is the day I'll consider an ATI offering.

Avatar 13977
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jan 5, 2004Jan 5 2004
2.
Jan 5, 2004Jan 5 2004
4.
Jan 5, 2004Jan 5 2004
5.
Jan 5, 2004Jan 5 2004
6.
Jan 5, 2004Jan 5 2004
7.
Jan 5, 2004Jan 5 2004
9.
Jan 5, 2004Jan 5 2004
12.
Jan 5, 2004Jan 5 2004
       ?
14.
Jan 5, 2004Jan 5 2004
        Re: ?
15.
Jan 5, 2004Jan 5 2004
         Re: ?
 20.
Jan 5, 2004Jan 5 2004
          Re: ?
21.
Jan 5, 2004Jan 5 2004
           Re: ?
22.
Jan 6, 2004Jan 6 2004
           Re: ?
23.
Jan 6, 2004Jan 6 2004
            Re: ?
17.
Jan 5, 2004Jan 5 2004
        Re: ?
18.
Jan 5, 2004Jan 5 2004
         Re: ?
19.
Jan 5, 2004Jan 5 2004
         Re: ?
10.
Jan 5, 2004Jan 5 2004
13.
Jan 5, 2004Jan 5 2004
8.
Jan 5, 2004Jan 5 2004
3.
Jan 5, 2004Jan 5 2004
11.
Jan 5, 2004Jan 5 2004
16.
Jan 5, 2004Jan 5 2004