9.
 
Re: Stalker benchmarks
Jan 5, 2004, 11:35
9.
Re: Stalker benchmarks Jan 5, 2004, 11:35
Jan 5, 2004, 11:35
 
Calm down guys, to tell you the truth, these benchmarks are based on the leaked version. No graphics card can spit out 100s of fps on DX9. Besides, all three levels that were tested are those that the leaked version contains (they just translated them from Russian to English [The editor who wrote these benchmarks seems to be Russian judging from his name]).
The leaked version is dated May 2002 and the game didn't have any DX9 renderer and the engine wasn't optimized for nvidia boards yet. And besides, the game engine isn't even finshed TODAY so it's doubtable that GSC Game World sent out a version to be benchmarked. Those results are just crap.
EDIT: Additionally, it's strange that they're hosting DX 8 pics and claim to have tested the DX 9 engine first. After contacting them they said that they just chose the title "yet another dx9 game". I don't understand what that site is doing.


This comment was edited on Jan 5, 11:38.
Best regards,

Waqar "HeadHunter" Tariq
Content Manager
http://www.oblivion-lost.com
news@oblivion-lost.com
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jan 5, 2004Jan 5 2004
2.
Jan 5, 2004Jan 5 2004
4.
Jan 5, 2004Jan 5 2004
5.
Jan 5, 2004Jan 5 2004
6.
Jan 5, 2004Jan 5 2004
7.
Jan 5, 2004Jan 5 2004
 9.
Jan 5, 2004Jan 5 2004
      Re: Stalker benchmarks
12.
Jan 5, 2004Jan 5 2004
       ?
14.
Jan 5, 2004Jan 5 2004
        Re: ?
15.
Jan 5, 2004Jan 5 2004
         Re: ?
20.
Jan 5, 2004Jan 5 2004
          Re: ?
21.
Jan 5, 2004Jan 5 2004
           Re: ?
22.
Jan 6, 2004Jan 6 2004
           Re: ?
23.
Jan 6, 2004Jan 6 2004
            Re: ?
17.
Jan 5, 2004Jan 5 2004
        Re: ?
18.
Jan 5, 2004Jan 5 2004
         Re: ?
19.
Jan 5, 2004Jan 5 2004
         Re: ?
10.
Jan 5, 2004Jan 5 2004
13.
Jan 5, 2004Jan 5 2004
8.
Jan 5, 2004Jan 5 2004
3.
Jan 5, 2004Jan 5 2004
11.
Jan 5, 2004Jan 5 2004
16.
Jan 5, 2004Jan 5 2004