FireStarter Demo

GSC Game World has released a playable demo for FireStarter, their still-gold action-packed first-person shooter. The demo offers solo and multiplayer action, as well as a benchmark, all for a 64 MB download. Mirrors are available on 3D Gamers, ActionTrip, Boomtown (registration required), Computer Games Online, Filerush, Gamer's Hell, Loadedinc (registration required), NWSGaming.Com, and Worthplaying.
View : : :
93.
 
Re: No subject
Dec 9, 2003, 13:31
93.
Re: No subject Dec 9, 2003, 13:31
Dec 9, 2003, 13:31
 
This is actually a really bad analogy here. You are implying that either win98 (with its lovely memory leak) or firestarter doesn't work, which is utterly untrue.

Fair enough, but actually my intent was to imply that Win98 isn't stable (I actually wasn't commenting on Firestarter at all), which is what the Pro-XP'ers on here are implying, that we should all upgrade to 2K/XP because it's more stable.

You are also implying that win98 and XP are the same, which they are not

Architecturally speaking, yes I am. Like I said they are both 32bit OS's running on x86 hardware.

Perhaps the way I worded it was confusing, I do realize that XP/2K is built upon the NT core, whereas 98 was built from the 95 core, so the two are completely different in the sense they are totally separate software projects. They both however still run 32bit Windows apps the same.

I don't think that one $100 upgrade

My figures were Canadian $$$'s, so no, for me it wouldn't be less than $100 (even with the Canadian dollar being so strong as of late)

but I don't think that one ... upgrade ... in 6 years is unfair here.

No dor I, if it brings with it value. The only value I see in XP over 98 is increased stability. Everything else in XP (from my perspective) is fluff, fluff which I don't think is worth the $100+ for the upgrade. And like I said, I don't think stability is something that we should be required to upgrade to get, it should come with the product.

Look at it this way, if Id puts out Doom 3 and it's buggier than hell, but they address these bugs in an paid expansion pack, would you not have a problem? Would you not have the expectation that as a paid customer of Doom 3 that any bugs should be fixed free of charge to you? Why is Windows any different?

There will always be people like you, refusing to upgrade and making game companies take longer to develop products for the rest of us

So IOW, my decision not to use XP on my gaming machine is adversely affecting you, so I should then upgrade? Uhm, no. The console market will always be easier to develop for, not only because of the variety of OS's (Wintel vs Mac vs Linux), but also the variety of hardware (ATI vs NVidia, etc etc). This is fundamental to the PC world, and while it's its greatest strength (unlimited capabilities, hardware/software can grow to meet new needs), it is simultaneously the biggest obstacle that developers (particularly game developers) face (non-standardized platform).

how long do you really expect win98 support to last?

In terms of bug fixes/stability/security issues, for as long as MS is around. The unfortunate thing is that software doesn't come with warranties, so this isn't realistic in the current software world.

Your system has stability and speed....fine; just don't expect to be able to play the latest and greatest games for long

But that's the point, that 98 doesn't have the stability of XP (in fact, XP's biggest selling point was the increased stability of the NT core). And if it means I can't play the latest & greatest, I'm willing to accept that (for now, largely because I can't play the latest & greatest anyways due to hardware limitations).

Anyways, I have to go write my exam.


PZ
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Currently Reading: J.R.R. Tolkien's "Lord of the Rings: Return of the King" -- Last Read: Kenneth Lux's "Adam Smith's Mistake: How a Moral Philosopher Invented Economics
This comment was edited on Dec 9, 13:33.
PZ
------------
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
2.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
5.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
6.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
7.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
13.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
8.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
    C'mon now
10.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
     Re: C'mon now
39.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
3.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
4.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
9.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
11.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
15.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
16.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
24.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
12.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
17.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
14.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
18.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
19.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
21.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
22.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
20.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
23.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
25.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
26.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
48.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
82.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
84.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
27.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
28.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
31.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
29.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
32.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
38.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
51.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
30.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
33.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
34.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
36.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
85.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
86.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
40.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
41.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
42.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
46.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
50.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
52.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
43.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
44.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
45.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
47.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
49.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
53.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
54.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
55.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
57.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
58.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
  Re: MP
59.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
   Re: MP
68.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
    Re: MP
69.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
     98 to XP
70.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
      Re: 98 to XP
61.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
63.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
71.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
72.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
     Re: No subject
74.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
      Re: No subject
75.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
       Re: No subject
73.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
     Re: No subject
88.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
      Re: No subject
89.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
       Re: No subject
65.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
56.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
60.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
62.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
64.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
66.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
79.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
80.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
    HI
81.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
     Re: HI
67.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
76.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
77.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
78.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
83.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
87.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
90.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
91.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
92.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
 93.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
 Re: No subject
94.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
95.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
96.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
97.
Dec 12, 2003Dec 12 2003