FPS Games & Minors

Bay Area Lawmaker Wants to Keep Minors from Buying Violent Video Games (thanks HomeLAN Fed) has word of an effort in the Bay Area to curtail minors' access to violent video games that would classify all first-person shooters as adult only by their very nature. Here's a bit:
Assemblyman Leland Yee (D-San Francisco) plans to introduce legislation this week that would keep minors from purchasing first shooter videogames, where players need to kill in order to advance.

“These first person shooter videogames really teach kids how to stalk and how to maim and torture and kill people,” Yee said. “That’s not what we should be doing for our kids.”

Yee is also a child psychologist, and he said, it is time to “draw the line.”

The bill would penalize retailers and other stores that sell the games to anyone under the age of 17. A second bill would require video game retailers to separate children's games from adult games.
View : : :
111 Replies. 6 pages. Viewing page 1.
Older [  1  2  3  4  5  6  ] Newer
1.
 
lol
Nov 30, 2003, 15:39
1.
lol Nov 30, 2003, 15:39
Nov 30, 2003, 15:39
 
These first person shooter videogames really teach kids how to stalk and how to maim and torture and kill people

Exactly how do they do so? I haven't seen one bit of scientific proof that games teach children to commit violent acts.

2.
 
Chex Quest
Nov 30, 2003, 15:42
2.
Chex Quest Nov 30, 2003, 15:42
Nov 30, 2003, 15:42
 
Guess little Billy can't play that brutal Chex Quest game anymore. He might go on an alter-dimension zapping spree.

Avatar 13188
3.
 
Question
Nov 30, 2003, 15:42
3.
Question Nov 30, 2003, 15:42
Nov 30, 2003, 15:42
 
Is this the part where everyone freaks out about how an 8 year old should be able to buy Soldier of Fortune 2 without anyone else knowing or caring?

4.
 
It's misleading
Nov 30, 2003, 15:48
4.
It's misleading Nov 30, 2003, 15:48
Nov 30, 2003, 15:48
 
The statement that games make people more violent is inaccurate; in studies, playing games has proven to make people more overtly agressive, not violent. Incidentally, it isn't necessarily a bad thing, since aggressiveness can also mean assertiveness. Either way, it's flawed logic. Playing games in a hyper-real environment doesn't make me a better killer or a more accurate marksman in real life.

5.
 
whoa!
Nov 30, 2003, 15:49
5.
whoa! Nov 30, 2003, 15:49
Nov 30, 2003, 15:49
 
Well damn, I must be the best god damned killer in the world. After all those FPS games I have played, I apparently have learned how to kill, MAIM AND TORTURE people and have no concience what so ever...

better draw myself a line here....

</sarcasm>

Really though, don't they ever get tired of this?


This comment was edited on Nov 30, 15:54.
6.
 
No subject
Nov 30, 2003, 15:54
6.
No subject Nov 30, 2003, 15:54
Nov 30, 2003, 15:54
 
Splinter Cell taught me how to infiltrate foreign installations and assassinate world leaders without being detected. That recent coup (although non-violent) in Georgie was all me.

Avatar 13977
7.
 
Hhhmm...
Nov 30, 2003, 15:56
7.
Hhhmm... Nov 30, 2003, 15:56
Nov 30, 2003, 15:56
 
....so it is okay to:

Brainwash kids into following a certain church and tell them if they dont do as they are told they are going to go to a place where they will burn in eternal damnation.

Teach children that Thanksgiving is about the pilgrims and indians getting together and having a peace feast.

Sell sugar and caffine loaded drinks to them, cuz you know all that shit is good for them.

Sell sugar loaded cereals to them and post a cute cartoon character on them and throw cheap ass toys in the boxes.

"Happy meals", 'nuff said.

Make 30 minute cartoons that have no more than 30 animation cells and 5 backgrounds per 10 episodes used in different combinations that sell cheap ass little cards. Hey, kids are stupid and they dont know any different, right? Give me an 85 episode space opera over a bunch of lazily drawn "monstors" any fucking day.




All these things that are just so great for kids but you know games like GTA where kids are taught the ways of stealing cars and helicopters or games where they are taught how to storm a beach in normandy or kill off an elite counter-terrorist team that trains for years are EXTREMELY bad for them.

I wonder what these puds think about Americas Army...

8.
 
I blame...
Nov 30, 2003, 15:56
8.
I blame... Nov 30, 2003, 15:56
Nov 30, 2003, 15:56
 
I blame Looney Tunes, ever since I was a kid I have had the urge to draw large targets in the road and wait to see if anyone stops there. When they do, I would be waiting above where I would drop a huge Acme Anvil on their head from way up high.


(Sorry, double clicked and it double posted and cant delete one of them)


This comment was edited on Nov 30, 15:57.
9.
 
I blame...
Nov 30, 2003, 15:56
9.
I blame... Nov 30, 2003, 15:56
Nov 30, 2003, 15:56
 
I blame Looney Tunes, ever since I was a kid I have had the urge to draw large targets in the road and wait to see if anyone stops there. When they do, I would be waiting above where I would drop a huge Acme Anvil on their head from way up high.
10.
 
Agreed
Nov 30, 2003, 16:06
10.
Agreed Nov 30, 2003, 16:06
Nov 30, 2003, 16:06
 
Is this the part where everyone freaks out about how an 8 year old should be able to buy Soldier of Fortune 2 without anyone else knowing or caring?

I think it's a good idea to make some effort to put choice back into parents hands. If a parent has no problem with little Billy playing Soldier of Fortune they can damn well go down to the store and buy it for him.

However, there are two problems with these proposed laws:

A second bill would require video game retailers to separate children's games from adult games.

This could unfairly penalize game companies, depending on how its implemented. I'm sure Mr. Yee would love it if the "Adult" games were kept in a dark back room behind a heavy curtain or under the counter. We don't put alcohol in an "Adult" section of the supermarket.

keep minors from purchasing first shooter videogames, where players need to kill in order to advance.

This is the most troubling. Calling all "first shooter" videogames adult. In DXIW presumably you can advance through the game without killing a soul. Can you do this in Grand Theft Auto too? Let's just rely on our existing rating system and enforce it at point of sale. Nobody's First Amendment rights are trampled on by some individual's inflated sense of moral outrage.

I know this guy, I know his type. Once, before going back home for Christmas, I stopped off in a neighborhood toy store to pick up some cheap plastic dart guns and squirt guns for my brothers and sisters and me (we're all growned up but dart gun fights are kind of a Christmas tradition in our house). I ask the lady behind the counter if she had any, and the sneering look of smoldering disdain she gave me was unbelievable. "We don't sell ... GUNS in this store," she said before turning her back on me.

This comment was edited on Nov 30, 16:09.
11.
 
Yawn
Nov 30, 2003, 16:20
11.
Yawn Nov 30, 2003, 16:20
Nov 30, 2003, 16:20
 
Another fuck ass Democrat without any kind of program to stick to, decides to rag on videogames some more.

The thing is, I'm actually a proponent of curtailing access to SOME videogames to minors, however, it's not because "These first person shooter videogames really teach kids how to stalk and how to maim and torture and kill people", which is total bullshit.

But, when I see that ALL the kids in my wife's seventh grade class (which is, what, age 12-14 or so?) have played Vice City, you know that something is going wrong with the rating system somewhere.

Creston

Avatar 15604
12.
 
Re:killin and maimin
Nov 30, 2003, 16:28
12.
Re:killin and maimin Nov 30, 2003, 16:28
Nov 30, 2003, 16:28
 
Ahhh it must be another election year!! all these guys have to find something to yell and scream and get attention and MONEY about. Sure glad Im over 50.. instead of banning games lets ban war and real guns and bombs and nukes.. naaaa too much money being made.

13.
 
Uhhh
Nov 30, 2003, 16:34
13.
Uhhh Nov 30, 2003, 16:34
Nov 30, 2003, 16:34
 
Violent games reduce violent crime cause instead the adolescents are at home doing it virtually, instead of for real. So Duh that'll reduce violence. We need to make a distinction between real violence and fake violence.

14.
 
Re: Uhhh
Nov 30, 2003, 16:36
14.
Re: Uhhh Nov 30, 2003, 16:36
Nov 30, 2003, 16:36
 
"Buying Violent Video Games"

I'm not a rocket scientist, buuut how can a VIDEO GAME be Violent?? There's probably a police report somewhere that says "Assault: By a Video Game"

15.
 
context
Nov 30, 2003, 16:40
15.
context Nov 30, 2003, 16:40
Nov 30, 2003, 16:40
 
I live in the SF Bay area, and i think we gotta put this into context. Just this past couple years, a group of teenagers, who were all big fans of GTA, went on a large spree where they murdered 5 people, held up dozens of people at gun point, and so forth.

http://newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/11/2/211043.shtml

Here's the only article i could find right away, but if you dig further you'll
find that the spree of theirs was pretty damn large in scale. Probably
the biggest thing like this in the country I bet.

Personally I love Day of Defeat, but I don't really think I need it to be
violent to enjoy it. maybe I"ve killed SO many people that i've gotten
bored of that aspect and just want to be challenged in tactical ways. heh heh

16.
 
Re: context
Nov 30, 2003, 16:45
16.
Re: context Nov 30, 2003, 16:45
Nov 30, 2003, 16:45
 
Oh how original. Violent games = violent people. Never saw the connection there..sheesh.

Games don't make me violent but know-nothing pricks talking about a subject matter they don't understand (but fear) does

"Leading the fight for original WASD gaming"
===
B: Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering?

P: I think so, Brain, but where are we going to find a duck and a hose at this hour?
17.
 
Nice source
Nov 30, 2003, 16:48
17.
Nice source Nov 30, 2003, 16:48
Nov 30, 2003, 16:48
 
You'll pardon me if I don't take a right-wing news website at face value, particularly one that has a picture of Charlton Heston off to the left (ironic, no?).

If videogames made people violent, we would logically expect to see an increase in violent crime over the past, say, 10 years, right? Hate to break it to you, and I invite you to hit www.fbi.gov to see for yourself, but violent crime has actually DIMINISHED. So much for the murder training programs.

This comment was edited on Nov 30, 16:50.
18.
 
Re: context
Nov 30, 2003, 16:57
18.
Re: context Nov 30, 2003, 16:57
Nov 30, 2003, 16:57
 
"Leading the fight for original WASD gaming"
Oh, the horror.
I used QWER before that crap was even invented. WASD is like second worst to arrow keys.

on topic: I think 10year olds will quickly find some pr0n financed gambling sites with links to whatever warez they want. So much for censorship.



Red Orchestra http://www.unrealwarfarex.com/redorchestra/ Best. game. ever.
19.
 
No subject
Nov 30, 2003, 16:58
19.
No subject Nov 30, 2003, 16:58
Nov 30, 2003, 16:58
 
I actually have a better idea. Why not ban all first person shooter games, EXCEPT those in which you play a brave American soldier, out to kill him some dirty terrorist A-rabs.

__

Its amazing that you can on hand try to ban PFS games, and on the other try to push 18 year old kids into the Army, brainwash them with fake partiotism and delusions of grandeur and send them to fight some war overseas.

So, according to them, when I'm 17 years old, I shouldn't be able to play a GAME in which I hold a gun. But, a year later, I should be able to OWN a gun. Pathetic.

20.
 
Re: context
Nov 30, 2003, 17:05
20.
Re: context Nov 30, 2003, 17:05
Nov 30, 2003, 17:05
 
damn QWER gamers...



How the hell do you play with QWER anyways?

111 Replies. 6 pages. Viewing page 1.
Older [  1  2  3  4  5  6  ] Newer