FPS Games & Minors

Bay Area Lawmaker Wants to Keep Minors from Buying Violent Video Games (thanks HomeLAN Fed) has word of an effort in the Bay Area to curtail minors' access to violent video games that would classify all first-person shooters as adult only by their very nature. Here's a bit:
Assemblyman Leland Yee (D-San Francisco) plans to introduce legislation this week that would keep minors from purchasing first shooter videogames, where players need to kill in order to advance.

“These first person shooter videogames really teach kids how to stalk and how to maim and torture and kill people,” Yee said. “That’s not what we should be doing for our kids.”

Yee is also a child psychologist, and he said, it is time to “draw the line.”

The bill would penalize retailers and other stores that sell the games to anyone under the age of 17. A second bill would require video game retailers to separate children's games from adult games.
View : : :
41.
 
Re: No subject
Nov 30, 2003, 18:16
41.
Re: No subject Nov 30, 2003, 18:16
Nov 30, 2003, 18:16
 
Years ago, my gamer friends would all talk about how annoyed they were that politicians were trying to take violence out of games. I didn't understand it, especially since i was 10 times the gamer they were, and often played the most violent of FPS games. And yet I didn't see the problem behind removing violence. Maybe lots of people are playing games to kill the crap outta people, to see gore, and they love that sense, but I dunno, I don't take it so literally maybe. Dont' get me wrong, I loved Kill Bill's exagerrated blood spouts, just like i love how some anime has crazy ways of having organs fly around. But still....... I don't really care if below 18 year old kids are forced to stay away from that kinda stuff. Doesn't seem like a big deal..... and considering how weird and out-of-touch-with-reality some hormonally-active boys can be, I think it's a pretty reasonable measure.

and I never understood why we're so obsessed with buying/selling things related to the mass carnage of warfare, exploiting war for entertainment purposes. It just seems odd. I'm under the impression, after reading many WW2 and Vietnam books by soldiers, that very few of them would ever even consider making money off of such a topic. And yet people who are not part of war, relish the opportunity to dump their collective millions of dollars into the topic for entertainment. Yeesh.
Personally, I'd still play my fav game, Day of Defeat, if it was teddy bears shooting bananas at each other. I'm there for the gameplay.

As for the Army being able to recruit 18 yr olds to go to war, and REALLY kill people, while banning 17 yr olds from even playing these games..... well the reasoning behind that is the military knows 18 yr olds are gullible, and that they can suck you in to fight in wars that you barely understand. 18 yr olds aren't exactly known for their high political and historical awareness. I'd argue that the military should raise the minimum age limit for recruitment to 25, because most 18 yr olds are friggin idiots and don't things through enough, and most 18 yr olds who do join the military are desperately poor.... which just makes them more likely to be friggin idiots. (I have lots of respect for the military as an establishment, BUT it would be a lie to say that all my friends who joined the military after high school were well-learned people.)

so yeah, it makes perfect sense here. US society says "you kids are too stupid to control your own smoking or drinking habits, and you're too stupid to play these super violent video games without regulation. BUT we *know* this, which is why we want you to join the military and kill stuff without asking questions."

Date
Subject
Author
1.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
2.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
3.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
5.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
10.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
52.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
96.
Dec 1, 2003Dec 1 2003
4.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
6.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
7.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
8.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
9.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
62.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
63.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
73.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
11.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
12.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
13.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
14.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
15.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
16.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
18.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
20.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
111.
Dec 7, 2003Dec 7 2003
    Re: context
30.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
   Off Topic
33.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
56.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
     Re: Off Topic
66.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
      Re: Off Topic
67.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
       Re: Off Topic
68.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
       Re: Off Topic
75.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
       Re: Off Topic
85.
Dec 1, 2003Dec 1 2003
        Re: Off Topic
58.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
60.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
17.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
23.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
25.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
26.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
54.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
38.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
19.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
21.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
22.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
24.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
27.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
29.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
53.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
95.
Dec 1, 2003Dec 1 2003
28.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
97.
Dec 1, 2003Dec 1 2003
98.
Dec 1, 2003Dec 1 2003
99.
Dec 1, 2003Dec 1 2003
100.
Dec 1, 2003Dec 1 2003
102.
Dec 1, 2003Dec 1 2003
101.
Dec 1, 2003Dec 1 2003
104.
Dec 1, 2003Dec 1 2003
31.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
32.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
35.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
 41.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
  Re: No subject
34.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
36.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
37.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
39.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
40.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
42.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
47.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
48.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
49.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
55.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
94.
Dec 1, 2003Dec 1 2003
45.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
43.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
44.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
46.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
50.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
51.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
57.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
59.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
70.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
71.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
  .
86.
Dec 1, 2003Dec 1 2003
   Re: .
61.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
64.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
65.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
69.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
72.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
74.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
76.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
77.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
78.
Nov 30, 2003Nov 30 2003
79.
Dec 1, 2003Dec 1 2003
80.
Dec 1, 2003Dec 1 2003
90.
Dec 1, 2003Dec 1 2003
81.
Dec 1, 2003Dec 1 2003
82.
Dec 1, 2003Dec 1 2003
83.
Dec 1, 2003Dec 1 2003
84.
Dec 1, 2003Dec 1 2003
 .
87.
Dec 1, 2003Dec 1 2003
88.
Dec 1, 2003Dec 1 2003
89.
Dec 1, 2003Dec 1 2003
92.
Dec 1, 2003Dec 1 2003
93.
Dec 1, 2003Dec 1 2003
105.
Dec 1, 2003Dec 1 2003
107.
Dec 2, 2003Dec 2 2003
  Tried
110.
Dec 2, 2003Dec 2 2003
   Re: Tried
91.
Dec 1, 2003Dec 1 2003
103.
Dec 1, 2003Dec 1 2003
106.
Dec 2, 2003Dec 2 2003
108.
Dec 2, 2003Dec 2 2003
109.
Dec 2, 2003Dec 2 2003