Frontline Reports from the Invisible War

Following the release of the demo for Deus Ex: Invisible War (story), a Delay Deus Ex: Invisible War Petition is online (thanks Scott) hoping to forestall the shooter/RPG sequel's release until some issues are ironed out, an effort that is probably futile in light of the game's gold announcement (story). In response to the types of complaints found in the petition, a post to the ION Storm Forums by Chris Carollo addresses some of the points made by detractors, and offers an unofficial Dxinvisible War Demo FAQ explaining why things are handled as they are, and outlining a few settings that can be tweaked.
View : : :
53.
 
two replies
Nov 26, 2003, 20:11
53.
two replies Nov 26, 2003, 20:11
Nov 26, 2003, 20:11
 
"Sign the Petition, its why we got a response at all, sign the PETITION, please."

The game went gold yesterday. It's planned to be in stores a week from today. No petition of any kind is going to motivate I.S. to stop production now. The financial hit that would cause makes it completely out of the realm of consideration. Pray for a really big patch (of course, that's likely to happen anyway).


"Try turning off AA, when I turned that on I was getting terrible frame rates, off the frame rates jumped to silky smooth."

Anti-aliasing has been available to gamers for how long now? Two years? Three? I'm not going to turn off a common, expected video card feature that works fine for me with every other game I play. It's not my fault that DXIW runs like shit with AA enabled, and I'm not going to gimp the features available with my card just because I.S. can't manage to implement efficient shaders. My card is the best available on the market aside from the 9800XT and it cost me a lot to buy it; if I.S. wants my $50 for their game, it's theire responsibility to make sure it works with my hardware.

Date
Subject
Author
1.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
2.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
11.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
13.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
4.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
 ...
6.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
22.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
   Re: ...
45.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
   Re: ...
52.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
    Re: ...
60.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
    Re: ...
14.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
21.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
3.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
7.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
10.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
8.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
9.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
33.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
34.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
5.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
12.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
15.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
19.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
16.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
17.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
18.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
20.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
23.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
28.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
24.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
30.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
31.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
  ?????
32.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
   Re: ?????
35.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
    Re: ?????
36.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
     Re: ?????
25.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
26.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
27.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
29.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
37.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
38.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
39.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
40.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
41.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
42.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
43.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
44.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
46.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
47.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
48.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
49.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
50.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
 53.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
 two replies
56.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
51.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
54.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
58.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
59.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
55.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
57.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
62.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
63.
Nov 26, 2003Nov 26 2003
65.
Nov 27, 2003Nov 27 2003
66.
Nov 27, 2003Nov 27 2003
67.
Nov 27, 2003Nov 27 2003
68.
Nov 27, 2003Nov 27 2003
69.
Nov 27, 2003Nov 27 2003
70.
Nov 27, 2003Nov 27 2003
     No subject
71.
Nov 27, 2003Nov 27 2003
72.
Nov 27, 2003Nov 27 2003
73.
Nov 27, 2003Nov 27 2003
74.
Nov 27, 2003Nov 27 2003
 .