Atari: T3 Demo Not Official

Atari sends word that the Terminator 3: war of the Machines demo in the story following this one is not the official demo for the game. While we cannot put the genie back in the bottle and un-post the news, here is their warning that this actually represents an early beta:
It has come to our attention that the media demo of T3 War has been placed on the Atari Australia web site for download by consumers. This is a mistake.

Please be aware that this build is NOT meant in any way to be a consumer "demo" and it will be removed from our site shortly. We will be releasing the real consumer demo in the near future, but the version that is online now will not be compatible with the official demo nor will it be compatible with the final game, both of which will have improved performance and online play.

Please do not direct your readers to this demo in Australia. If you have already posted the news, please remove it. If you feel you must mention this demo in a news item, it should be referred to as an early Beta Test for the game -- which it is -- this is NOT a "demo." It was meant for press eyes only and came with disclaimers as to what was not incorporated into the build at this time.

This demo's availability will only lead to confusion and compatibility issues, and you should wait for the official demo.
View : : :
21.
 
Hmm
Nov 21, 2003, 01:37
21.
Hmm Nov 21, 2003, 01:37
Nov 21, 2003, 01:37
 
Well, I've played it a bit more and my comparison to Wolf ET was a bit much. It was a quick response to some of the negative stuff here. The serial goal progression isn't nearly as in depth and the 2 maps don't seem to have things to build up. The techs don't really seem to be needed for specific objectives either(at least in the 2 maps included). Also, the character classes aren't nearly as developed. Hopefully this will change. I still think that it shows much more promise than some of the posts here though. If they put some more serious depth in their mission based goals like Wolf-ET and iron out the kinks, I'd buy this in a second.

This comment was edited on Nov 21, 03:21.
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Nov 20, 2003Nov 20 2003
2.
Nov 20, 2003Nov 20 2003
3.
Nov 20, 2003Nov 20 2003
5.
Nov 20, 2003Nov 20 2003
6.
Nov 20, 2003Nov 20 2003
7.
Nov 20, 2003Nov 20 2003
9.
Nov 20, 2003Nov 20 2003
    No subject
13.
Nov 20, 2003Nov 20 2003
     Re: No subject
15.
Nov 20, 2003Nov 20 2003
      Re: No subject
16.
Nov 20, 2003Nov 20 2003
       Re: No subject
10.
Nov 20, 2003Nov 20 2003
11.
Nov 20, 2003Nov 20 2003
  weak
12.
Nov 20, 2003Nov 20 2003
   Re: weak
17.
Nov 20, 2003Nov 20 2003
   Re: weak
18.
Nov 20, 2003Nov 20 2003
    Re: weak
19.
Nov 20, 2003Nov 20 2003
     Re: weak
22.
Nov 21, 2003Nov 21 2003
     Re: weak
4.
Nov 20, 2003Nov 20 2003
8.
Nov 20, 2003Nov 20 2003
14.
Nov 20, 2003Nov 20 2003
20.
Nov 21, 2003Nov 21 2003
 21.
Nov 21, 2003Nov 21 2003
Hmm
23.
Nov 22, 2003Nov 22 2003