I'll have a go on hard today, shouldn't take more than a few hours
#35:
Actually no. Romantic tragedies are all very well in plays and books, but I don't think they make for good material where there is a player who is, in effect, destined to lose the game. My entire point *does not* revolve around how emotionally well done the entire thing was (yes, I appreciated that in the first one too), but how I feel the satisfaction of the player works. A game that you cannot (from most perspectives) win, is a very debatable descision, yet you seem to have little to no respect for me debating not liking it.