Out of the Blue

I know there are a lot of folks with mixed (or negative) feelings about the movie, but I have been looking forward to today's release of the Matrix Reloaded on DVD since the date was announced... there are a couple of questions about how things come together in relation to the first movie and the upcoming conclusion of the trilogy that it will be fun to try and work on, as well as general Matrix goodness to be explored.

Stories of the Day: Revellers Down Plane. Thanks John Nelson.
Fijians say sorry to eaten Briton's family. Thanks Jamie Sefton.
Martial arts expert kills two raiders. Thanks Kazmont.
Science!: Can Rain Be Bought Experts Seed Clouds and Seek Answers (registration required).
Reaping and Sewing From Corn.
Study: Marijuana smokers' sperm slow.
Follow-up: Report: Navy to limit sonar to protect whales.
Thanks Mike Martinez.
View : : :
58.
 
Re: Whew
Oct 14, 2003, 17:24
58.
Re: Whew Oct 14, 2003, 17:24
Oct 14, 2003, 17:24
 
The new Star Wars trilogy is a combination of bad acting and bad directing.

The scripts for the new movie are awful. There's some good story in there, but to find it, you'll have dig past all the crappy, stale dialogue and the gimmicky plot devices (Jar Jar, Jango Fett, etc). Lucas does not know anything about characters; all he cares about is the story. But you need characters for a good story to work. There's a quote by (I think) Mark Hamill that says "If George could make a movie without using actors, he would."

George Lucas's directing also contributes to the suckiness of the new Star Wars as well. He keeps his actors on a tight leash, not giving them much of a chance to act. But the kicker is that George really wasn't that great of a director to being with. The only movie from the original series that he directed was the first (Ep. IV) which is arguably the worst of the original trilogy. The others were directed by Lawerence Kasdan and somebody else. Also, others assisted with the writing of the second two as well. Personally, I think Lucas rides the sucess of others. I mean, most people have no clue that Lucas didn't direct Ep. V and VI. He's good at coming up with stories but he's an average director and an average writer. The fact that Lucas has no one helping him with the directing or script of the new movies just shows how mediocre he is. There's no one there saying to him "That's a bad idea, George!" or "Let's try that again, but use some more emotion!". George sees bad dialogue (his own doing) and throws in some gimmicky special effects and cameos (IE. Chebacca in Ep. III and Jango Fett being the cloned dued) to cover up for his crappyness and to win him points with geeky viewers who feel smart because "Oh, that character appeared in the first movies!". He also throws things in like Jar-Jar to give his movie more appeal to kids, which is stupid because the originals weren't "kids" movies per say, they were movies everyone could enjoy. I think greed is a factor in this and other aspects. He wants wide appeal and merchandising so he can sell more tickets. Why do you think he made this new trilogy in the first place? Because it made up his "definative vision"? Bullshit. He didn't even come up with half the stuff in the original series. If he did, then he really would be a good writer and wouldn't produce the drivel the new trilogy is.

What George Lucas needed to do was to make himself executive producer of the new movies and farm out the directing and scripting to others. He's good at finding talent, he just doesn't have a whole lot himself.

Now, Ep. III could be really good and I'll have to eat my hat, but somehow (despite the fact that I terribly want it to be good) I think that it will be just as bad as the others.

Whew.


There was only one catch and that was Catch-22
Who knows but that, on the lower frequencies, I speak for you?
http://citizenb.com/ - Now at v1.1
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
3.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
4.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
5.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
6.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
    Re: matrix
7.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
     Re: matrix
25.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
      Re: matrix
27.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
       No subject
100.
Oct 21, 2003Oct 21 2003
        Re: No subject
9.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
2.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
8.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
10.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
11.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
13.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
14.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
16.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
19.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
20.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
      NINJAI!!!!
26.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
17.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
45.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
46.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
52.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
47.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
51.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
86.
Oct 15, 2003Oct 15 2003
87.
Oct 15, 2003Oct 15 2003
89.
Oct 15, 2003Oct 15 2003
90.
Oct 15, 2003Oct 15 2003
       Re: Matrix Reloaded
91.
Oct 15, 2003Oct 15 2003
       Re: Matrix Reloaded
92.
Oct 15, 2003Oct 15 2003
        Re: Matrix Reloaded
93.
Oct 15, 2003Oct 15 2003
         Re: Matrix Reloaded
94.
Oct 15, 2003Oct 15 2003
95.
Oct 16, 2003Oct 16 2003
12.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
18.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
30.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
36.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
37.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
40.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
44.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
49.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
     Re: Star Warz
50.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
      Re: Star Warz
53.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
       Re: Star Warz
55.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
        Re: Star Warz
73.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
         Re: Star Warz
74.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
          Re: Star Warz
75.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
           Re: Star Warz
76.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
            Cubs!!!!
77.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
             Re: Cubs!!!!
78.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
              Re: Cubs!!!!
80.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
               Re: Cubs!!!!
79.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
              Re: Cubs!!!!
82.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
            Re: Star Warz
83.
Oct 15, 2003Oct 15 2003
          Re: Star Warz
84.
Oct 15, 2003Oct 15 2003
           Re: Star Warz
85.
Oct 15, 2003Oct 15 2003
            Re: Star Warz
41.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
42.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
43.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
15.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
29.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
31.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
33.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
21.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
22.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
23.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
24.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
28.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
32.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
34.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
35.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
38.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
39.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
48.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
56.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
 58.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
  Re: Whew
60.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
   Re: Whew
61.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
   Re: Whew
62.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
    Re: Whew
88.
Oct 15, 2003Oct 15 2003
     Re: Whew
63.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
64.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
65.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
67.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
68.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
69.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
70.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
71.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
72.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
66.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
54.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
59.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
57.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
81.
Oct 14, 2003Oct 14 2003
96.
Oct 18, 2003Oct 18 2003
97.
Oct 18, 2003Oct 18 2003
98.
Oct 19, 2003Oct 19 2003
99.
Oct 20, 2003Oct 20 2003