Half-Life 2 = April 2004?

A couple of mainstream articles on the Half-Life 2 source code leak have appeared on New Scientist (thanks Mr.Skull) and CNET News.com (thanks Mike Martinez). Neither of those do much other than rehash the situation, but Vivendi's "Half Life II" game delayed by code theft on Reuters (thanks Brett Hopkins) has the first indications of how the fallout from this is impacting the game's release, (though this is not directly from Valve, so if the pattern that's been established continues, we expect this is not the last word on the topic). Here's the quote that suggests the new release date has been delayed until at least April 2004:
"A third of the source code was stolen. It's serious because it forces us to delay the launch of the game by at least four months, that is to April 2004. Just the time to rewrite parts of the game," VU Games president of international operations Christophe Ramboz told daily Les Echos in its Tuesday edition."
Update: Half-Life Source (ironically titled, under the circumstances) has their report based on visiting Valve saying that "only a SMALL PORTION" of the source has been stolen, and an email they attribute to "Mike Thompson who says he works for Vivendi Universal" saying "delay is not confirmed..." Did I mention this might not be the last word on this subject?
View : : :
180.
 
Re: Johnny Cochran works for VUG?
Oct 9, 2003, 05:04
Flo
 
Re: Johnny Cochran works for VUG? Oct 9, 2003, 05:04
Oct 9, 2003, 05:04
 Flo
 
OK let's face it, the source code has been stolen, but you really should consider this:
This is Chewbacca. Chewbacca is a Wookiee from the planet Kashyyk, but Chewbacca lives on the planet Endor. Now think about it. That does not make sense. Why would a Wookiee , an eight-foot-tall Wookiee , want to live on Endor with a bunch of two-foot-tall Ewoks. That does not make sense. But more important, you have to ask yourself what does this have to do with this case.


Supporter of the "Chewbacca Defense"
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
6.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
7.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
2.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
4.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
8.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
  BS
3.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
5.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
10.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
9.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
11.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
17.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
24.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
27.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
28.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
33.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
30.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
32.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
34.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
37.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
39.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
50.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
53.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
          Well this sucks
59.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
           Re: Well this sucks
61.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
            Re: Well this sucks
44.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
49.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
41.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
134.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
139.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
12.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
13.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
20.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
26.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
14.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
15.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
22.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
16.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
18.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
19.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
21.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
67.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
23.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
71.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
77.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
87.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
81.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
86.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
84.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
126.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
145.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
156.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
     Re: Conspiracy?
157.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
      Whoa!!
91.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
25.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
29.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
31.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
35.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
38.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
46.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
47.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
36.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
40.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
42.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
43.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
45.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
51.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
52.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
54.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
55.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
56.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
58.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
57.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
60.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
62.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
68.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
70.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
92.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
63.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
64.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
65.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
73.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
66.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
72.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
79.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
80.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
89.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
96.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
   Re: Funny
109.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
    Re: Funny
111.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
     Re: Funny
113.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
      Re: Funny
114.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
       Conspiracy Theories
116.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
        Re: Conspiracy Theories
129.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
         Re: Conspiracy Theories
122.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
       Damn
140.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
      Re: Funny
74.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
78.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
83.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
75.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
76.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
82.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
85.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
93.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
88.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
97.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
98.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
100.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
176.
Oct 8, 2003Oct 8 2003
99.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
121.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
142.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
90.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
94.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
95.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
101.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
102.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
103.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
104.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
105.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
106.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
107.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
108.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
112.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
110.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
  105
117.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
120.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
123.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
130.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
131.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
141.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
151.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
152.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
     WTF
153.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
      Re: WTF
154.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
      Re: WTF
159.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
161.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
162.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
163.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
165.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
166.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
168.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
169.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
171.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
172.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
 180.
Oct 9, 2003Oct 9 2003
         Re: Johnny Cochran works for VUG?
181.
Oct 9, 2003Oct 9 2003
182.
Oct 9, 2003Oct 9 2003
           Re: Johnny Cochran works for VUG?
167.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
115.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
125.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
118.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
124.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
119.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
127.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
128.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
132.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
133.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
135.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
136.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
137.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
138.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
143.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
144.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
146.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
147.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
148.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
149.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
150.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
155.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
158.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
160.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
164.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
170.
Oct 7, 2003Oct 7 2003
173.
Oct 8, 2003Oct 8 2003
174.
Oct 8, 2003Oct 8 2003
175.
Oct 8, 2003Oct 8 2003
177.
Oct 8, 2003Oct 8 2003
178.
Oct 8, 2003Oct 8 2003
179.
Oct 8, 2003Oct 8 2003
183.
Oct 9, 2003Oct 9 2003
185.
Oct 10, 2003Oct 10 2003
184.
Oct 10, 2003Oct 10 2003
186.
Oct 11, 2003Oct 11 2003
187.
Oct 11, 2003Oct 11 2003
188.
Oct 12, 2003Oct 12 2003
189.
Oct 12, 2003Oct 12 2003
190.
Oct 13, 2003Oct 13 2003