and I also think valve has a good case against Microsoft (Assuming they kept all other doors guarded...).
Not really shul. This vulnerability in Outlook was patched well over a year ago. If Valve chooses not to patch, they can't blame Microsoft for getting hacked. (Which is the only reason Microsoft patches anyways, to avoid legal responsibility.)
p'haps u can make some money but the hacker will surely make more if they hacked into a bank or something
Except that banks actually have more than adequate security to stop something as simple as a keygrabber.
You can't ask programmers to stop using the Net
No reason to do that, actually. Set up a one way connection. They can download off the net, or look some stuff up to their heart's content, but that PC won't actually allow any traffic to go off it. But even so, it can't be that much effort to code on a PC that's not hooked up to the biggest security risk on the planet (ie, the Internet). That Valve chose to do so, and even worse, have approximately zero security into place was not a very smart decision, and they (unfortunately) paid for it.
Nexus's last comments made me think of something. What if this sourcecode is used to create something similar to the battle.net clone / spoof (can't remember its name...) that got Blizzard all riled up awhile back, which won't force you to go through Steam? It's about the only moderately useful thing I can see coming out of this.
Creston
PS : Fungu, who the fuck are you, exactly?
This comment was edited on Oct 4, 16:01.