Half-Life 2 Console Plans

A report on Computer and Video Games (thanks Frans), showing contempt for other site's speculative posts on the topic, gets confirmation from Valve that the Xbox is the only console system currently targeted for a port of Half-Life 2, quoting Doug Lombardi as saying: "At this point, there are no plans to publish a version [of Half-Life 2] for either of Sony or Nintendo's current systems." They then proceed to speculate on the likelihood of PS3 and GameCube 2 versions of the game, based on Doug's comment that: "Valve is obviously interested in hearing more about their [Sony and Nintendo] next-generation plans and discuss the possibilities of doing something with them."
View : : :
29.
 
Re: ban it
Sep 30, 2003, 02:44
29.
Re: ban it Sep 30, 2003, 02:44
Sep 30, 2003, 02:44
 
XBox didn't have better spec, I'm sure my PC was faster at the time. Let me think...

Yeah, I had a Pentium 3 667 overclocked to 750. I had 128MB of RAM. The weak link was a Geforce 2 MX card, but that was only because I couldn't afford the Geforce 4s which were out then.

And considering I was behind the curve at the time, I think it's fair to say that PCs were better than the XBox even back then.

As for brand buying... Why not? Sony make damn good audio goods, so if I were to buy a personal stereo I'd make it a Walkman. Creative make very good PC audio stuff, so the jukebox I got is made by them (excusing all the proprietary filesystem crap, it is the nicest of the lot), and Canon make some of the best imaging products in the world, and I'd love to own a scanner, high end printer, and digital camera all made by them.

So sometimes brand loyalty is a good thing.

Date
Subject
Author
1.
Sep 29, 2003Sep 29 2003
2.
Sep 29, 2003Sep 29 2003
9.
Sep 29, 2003Sep 29 2003
3.
Sep 29, 2003Sep 29 2003
5.
Sep 29, 2003Sep 29 2003
6.
Sep 29, 2003Sep 29 2003
14.
Sep 29, 2003Sep 29 2003
4.
Sep 29, 2003Sep 29 2003
8.
Sep 29, 2003Sep 29 2003
7.
Sep 29, 2003Sep 29 2003
10.
Sep 29, 2003Sep 29 2003
11.
Sep 29, 2003Sep 29 2003
12.
Sep 29, 2003Sep 29 2003
13.
Sep 29, 2003Sep 29 2003
   ban it
15.
Sep 29, 2003Sep 29 2003
    Re: ban it
21.
Sep 29, 2003Sep 29 2003
     Re: ban it
22.
Sep 29, 2003Sep 29 2003
      Re: ban it
 29.
Sep 30, 2003Sep 30 2003
      Re: ban it
17.
Sep 29, 2003Sep 29 2003
16.
Sep 29, 2003Sep 29 2003
19.
Sep 29, 2003Sep 29 2003
20.
Sep 29, 2003Sep 29 2003
23.
Sep 29, 2003Sep 29 2003
24.
Sep 29, 2003Sep 29 2003
25.
Sep 29, 2003Sep 29 2003
26.
Sep 29, 2003Sep 29 2003
27.
Sep 29, 2003Sep 29 2003
28.
Sep 29, 2003Sep 29 2003
18.
Sep 29, 2003Sep 29 2003
30.
Sep 30, 2003Sep 30 2003
31.
Sep 30, 2003Sep 30 2003
32.
Sep 30, 2003Sep 30 2003
33.
Sep 30, 2003Sep 30 2003