Half-Life's Steamy Future

A post on Planet Half-Life (thanks Frans) reproduces some quotes from Valve's Erik Johnson posted to a Steam forum thread discussing the role of Steam in the future of Half-Life. Here are the excerpts:
There will no longer be a WonID system, it will be replaced by the SteamID system.

When we convert the userbase to Steam, a single WonID will be valid for all of the products.

If you're purchased a product from us at retail, you're going to have access to all of our products via Steam.

No, you do not have to pay for Steam.

That is correct, you'll have to have Steam installed to play the most current version of Half-Life.
View : : :
163.
 
Steam
Sep 12, 2003, 10:42
Steam Sep 12, 2003, 10:42
Sep 12, 2003, 10:42
 
Yea I only installed Steam to get those latest Half-Life Movies, and I didnt like having to do that at all, why have to install that software just to download some Bink Movies.
Yea listen up people better start complaining now, you let these companies start getting used to putting stuff like this on your PC and they will all start doing it. I think allot of times its the older guys that have the right attitude towards this, they are allot more used to the concept that they shouldnt have to run anything to use someones product, and that the voice of the customer should be more important than worrying about the people that steal games, in other words dont piss off your real customers to get rid of people that are copying your software.
I buy allot of games, I dont buy allot of other software actually sometimes I copy other software, but my computer room at home is almost overloaded with bought video games boxes, most that I will never play again.
There is so much software that tries to do shit like this now adays. The guy that said that everytime you install crap like this and it runs in the backround makes the chances of having PC problems allot more, is RIGHT ON TARGET here. You install windows and you right away have a dame MS Instant Messager on the task bar running, you need to turn off, then there are like 100 other programs that somehow think that they deserve a space on your taskbar...
RealAudio
QuickTime
Winamp
Winzip
Most Mail programs (I know Netscape did this)

There are tons more, feel free to add to this list.
I spend most my time affter a install figuing out haw to get the dame icon off the task bar, and make sure it dont run anything in the backround. I know that RealAudio used to run the actual app pretty much in the backround the whole time, just not showing itself, why? because it makes it start faster when you click a real audio video link. Like as if I want that thing running all the time, I might watch Real Audio/Video once a month if that, let the app start up right then for christs sake! I am sure Microsoft Media player does this anyway, but its now built in the OS so much it is probally always runnnig or something.
It always makes me laugh when I go checkout someones pc and the taskber is just filled with shit, and they are having computer problems. And now to play a certain game they want to make you run something like that all the time, shit!
Its like everyone is tring really hard to get a spot on that task bar. I to doubt this will hinder in anyway peopel that really want to copy this game. this sounds more of a way for Valve to keep track of its customers, we are living in a highly comercialized and marketed worl that stuff like this is just everywhere and it gets upsetting.

This comment was edited on Sep 12, 10:49.
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
14.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
15.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
16.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
17.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
18.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
155.
Sep 9, 2003Sep 9 2003
156.
Sep 9, 2003Sep 9 2003
159.
Sep 10, 2003Sep 10 2003
160.
Sep 11, 2003Sep 11 2003
161.
Sep 12, 2003Sep 12 2003
162.
Sep 12, 2003Sep 12 2003
157.
Sep 10, 2003Sep 10 2003
2.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
3.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
4.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
5.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
7.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
8.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
11.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
     Re: No subject
6.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
10.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
12.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
13.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
34.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
37.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
41.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
43.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
19.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
21.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
36.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
20.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
22.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
25.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
29.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
   Re: Pah!
35.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
    ???
39.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
40.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
      Well
48.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
       Re: Well
49.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
        Re: Well
53.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
        Re: Well
55.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
         Re: Well
56.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
          Re: Well
57.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
           Re: Well
59.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
            Re: Well
63.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
             Re: Well
71.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
              Re: Well
61.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
           Re: Well
64.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
            Re: Well
65.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
             Re: Great...
66.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
             Re: Well
123.
Sep 8, 2003Sep 8 2003
125.
Sep 8, 2003Sep 8 2003
126.
Sep 8, 2003Sep 8 2003
         Re: Anti-Steam Sentiments.
138.
Sep 8, 2003Sep 8 2003
139.
Sep 8, 2003Sep 8 2003
44.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
45.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
46.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
       Re: ??? (Post # 35)
47.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
        Re: ??? (Post # 35)
52.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
         Re: ??? (Post # 35)
28.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
30.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
   Re: Pah!
31.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
    Re: Pah!
32.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
     Re: Pah!
33.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
   Re: Pah!
51.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
    Re: Pah!
54.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
     My problem
60.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
      Re: My problem
62.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
       Re: My problem
174.
Sep 14, 2003Sep 14 2003
23.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
38.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
27.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
24.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
26.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
42.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
50.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
58.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
67.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
68.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
69.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
70.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
73.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
74.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
75.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
76.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
78.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
     Re: No subject
79.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
      Re: No subject
80.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
       Re: No subject
81.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
        POS...
82.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
         Re: POS...
83.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
          Re: POS...
84.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
          Re: POS...
85.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
           Re: POS...
86.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
            Re: POS...
87.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
             Re: POS...
89.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
              Re: POS...
90.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
               Re: POS...
88.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
             Re: hmmmm
122.
Sep 8, 2003Sep 8 2003
            Re: POS...
77.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
72.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
121.
Sep 8, 2003Sep 8 2003
91.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
92.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
93.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
94.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
95.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
   Re: huh?
96.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
    Re: huh?
97.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
     Um
98.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
99.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
104.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
   Um
111.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
112.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
113.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
   Re: huh?
100.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
101.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
102.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
103.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
105.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
106.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
107.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
108.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
110.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
109.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
114.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
115.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
116.
Sep 7, 2003Sep 7 2003
117.
Sep 8, 2003Sep 8 2003
118.
Sep 8, 2003Sep 8 2003
119.
Sep 8, 2003Sep 8 2003
120.
Sep 8, 2003Sep 8 2003
124.
Sep 8, 2003Sep 8 2003
127.
Sep 8, 2003Sep 8 2003
128.
Sep 8, 2003Sep 8 2003
129.
Sep 8, 2003Sep 8 2003
130.
Sep 8, 2003Sep 8 2003
131.
Sep 8, 2003Sep 8 2003
132.
Sep 8, 2003Sep 8 2003
133.
Sep 8, 2003Sep 8 2003
140.
Sep 8, 2003Sep 8 2003
141.
Sep 8, 2003Sep 8 2003
142.
Sep 8, 2003Sep 8 2003
     Re: No subject
143.
Sep 8, 2003Sep 8 2003
      Re: No subject
146.
Sep 8, 2003Sep 8 2003
       Re: No subject
147.
Sep 8, 2003Sep 8 2003
        Re: No subject
148.
Sep 8, 2003Sep 8 2003
        Re: No subject
149.
Sep 8, 2003Sep 8 2003
       Re: No subject
150.
Sep 8, 2003Sep 8 2003
        Re: No subject
151.
Sep 8, 2003Sep 8 2003
         Re: No subject
168.
Sep 13, 2003Sep 13 2003
      I object...
169.
Sep 13, 2003Sep 13 2003
       Re: I object...
170.
Sep 13, 2003Sep 13 2003
        Re: I object...
171.
Sep 14, 2003Sep 14 2003
         Re: I object...
134.
Sep 8, 2003Sep 8 2003
135.
Sep 8, 2003Sep 8 2003
136.
Sep 8, 2003Sep 8 2003
137.
Sep 8, 2003Sep 8 2003
144.
Sep 8, 2003Sep 8 2003
145.
Sep 8, 2003Sep 8 2003
152.
Sep 9, 2003Sep 9 2003
153.
Sep 9, 2003Sep 9 2003
154.
Sep 9, 2003Sep 9 2003
158.
Sep 10, 2003Sep 10 2003
 163.
Sep 12, 2003Sep 12 2003
Steam
164.
Sep 12, 2003Sep 12 2003
165.
Sep 12, 2003Sep 12 2003
166.
Sep 13, 2003Sep 13 2003
167.
Sep 13, 2003Sep 13 2003
173.
Sep 14, 2003Sep 14 2003
178.
Sep 14, 2003Sep 14 2003
172.
Sep 14, 2003Sep 14 2003
175.
Sep 14, 2003Sep 14 2003
176.
Sep 14, 2003Sep 14 2003
177.
Sep 14, 2003Sep 14 2003