Battlefield Vietnam Q&A

BF42.de's Battlefield Vietnam Q&A talks with Armand 'Aj' Marini from DICE about the upcoming Vietnam War follow-up. They discuss the BF1942 mods with related features like EoD and Desert Combat, including this on how the helicopters in BF Vietnam will differ from those in DC:
The Battlefield vehicle system was never intended to be used with helicopters. We had looked at trying something similar with vertical take off (VTOL) vehicles in Secret Weapons, but the system did not allow for an acceptable level of control. The Desert Combat helicopters are the best attempt I've seen at trying to adapt the BF: 1942 system to be used in that capacity, but the issues of control and accessibility still exist.

We wanted a helicopter that was useful in a true helicopter sense. It had to hover with pinpoint accuracy, fly backwards, fly sideways, and airlift. It had to be immensely versatile and as easy to control as a tank. The BF: 1942 system didn't allow for any of those requirements. A new physics system was created for the helicopters and we are extremely pleased with the level of playability we've achieved. You can place it exactly where you want it to be.
View : : :
10.
 
Re: No subject
Aug 28, 2003, 11:26
10.
Re: No subject Aug 28, 2003, 11:26
Aug 28, 2003, 11:26
 
I'm pretty sure DC is more popular. I can't say it's better (haven't played EOD) but here are definately more servers.

Date
Subject
Author
1.
Aug 28, 2003Aug 28 2003
30.
Aug 28, 2003Aug 28 2003
2.
Aug 28, 2003Aug 28 2003
3.
Aug 28, 2003Aug 28 2003
4.
Aug 28, 2003Aug 28 2003
5.
Aug 28, 2003Aug 28 2003
6.
Aug 28, 2003Aug 28 2003
7.
Aug 28, 2003Aug 28 2003
 10.
Aug 28, 2003Aug 28 2003
    Re: No subject
11.
Aug 28, 2003Aug 28 2003
     Re: No subject
12.
Aug 28, 2003Aug 28 2003
      Re: No subject
18.
Aug 28, 2003Aug 28 2003
22.
Aug 28, 2003Aug 28 2003
23.
Aug 28, 2003Aug 28 2003
     Re: No subject
25.
Aug 28, 2003Aug 28 2003
      Re: No subject
26.
Aug 28, 2003Aug 28 2003
      Re: No subject
28.
Aug 28, 2003Aug 28 2003
      Re: No subject
8.
Aug 28, 2003Aug 28 2003
9.
Aug 28, 2003Aug 28 2003
13.
Aug 28, 2003Aug 28 2003
15.
Aug 28, 2003Aug 28 2003
19.
Aug 28, 2003Aug 28 2003
  Re: .
21.
Aug 28, 2003Aug 28 2003
   Re: .
16.
Aug 28, 2003Aug 28 2003
17.
Aug 28, 2003Aug 28 2003
  Re: .
14.
Aug 28, 2003Aug 28 2003
20.
Aug 28, 2003Aug 28 2003
24.
Aug 28, 2003Aug 28 2003
27.
Aug 28, 2003Aug 28 2003
29.
Aug 28, 2003Aug 28 2003
31.
Aug 28, 2003Aug 28 2003