Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
User Settings
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:
Germany 08/31
Chicago, IL USA, IL 10/19

Regularly scheduled events

Games = Free Speech

Appeals court rules video games qualify as free speech has word of an appeals court decision overturning a previous ruling that stated computer and video games were not free speech as protected by the U.S. Constitution. Here's a bit:

Last April, Senior U.S. District Judge Stephen Limbaugh ruled that computer and video games had "no conveyance of ideas, expression or anything else that could possibly amount to free speech" in a St. Louis County case that sought to limit children's access to mature video games.

The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals disagreed, saying a "particularized message" is not required when it comes to the First Amendment.

"If the First Amendment is versatile enough to 'shield [the] painting of Jackson Pollock, music of Arnold Schoenberg, or Jabberwocky verse of Lewis Carroll,' we see no reason why the pictures, graphic design, concept art, sounds, music, stories, and narrative present in video games are not entitled to a similar protection," the court said in its ruling. "The mere fact that they appear in a novel medium is of no legal consequence."

39. Re: Ahh... Jun 4, 2003, 09:43 Xombie
Of course, they could forsee the possibility of giving rights to everyone. They aren't retarded. For example, they knew giving women the right to vote would take power away from men. Everytime Jefferson punished a slave he owned, a small part of him knew it was wrong. They aren't amoral either. And if his slave could vote. He'd vote Jefferson right out of power.
Though this has no real bearing on the subject at hand, I'd like to note that Jefferson was in fact uncommonly humane to his slaves. Archaeologists have studied Jefferson's plantation and found that they had their own small houses and material posessions, such as some fine china. Their lives were roughly on the same level as that of a lower-class citizen.
Jefferson really only kept slaves because he knew he had to in order to run his plantation and remain rich, not because he was a racist. I'm of course not trying to justify his keeping of slaves in any way, I'm just clearing up that he wasn't some horribly sadistic person that saw black people as being nothing above dogs, like many plantation owners were.

I think what many people are forgetting is that the "founding fathers" were upper-class citizens. As one of my college professors put it, when we broke off from England, we simply "replaced one group of rich guys with another group of rich guys". Strangely enough, this has been the way our government has always gone. The upper class are the only people represented in highest branches of government.
Xombie x0mbie x0mb|e Xombie
Previous Post Next Post Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
    Date Subject Author
  1. Jun 3, 21:53 Thank God Maximus_IGN
  2. Jun 3, 21:57  Re: Thank God Liquid
  3. Jun 3, 22:05  Re: Thank God Sepharo
  4. Jun 3, 22:11   Re: Thank God Nonicknameforme
  5. Jun 3, 22:12  Re: Thank God Narf2029
  13. Jun 4, 00:08  Re: Thank God Fang
  14. Jun 4, 00:25   Re: Thank God Cicatrix
  16. Jun 4, 00:40  Re: Thank God Ray Marden
  18. Jun 4, 00:45   Re: Thank God Halo
  6. Jun 3, 22:26 No subject Zha Zha Lau
  7. Jun 3, 22:40 GIVE ME... Ray Marden
  8. Jun 3, 22:50  Re: GIVE ME... Furious
  9. Jun 3, 22:59   Re: GIVE ME... Ray Marden
  10. Jun 3, 23:26 Limbaugh darthgeezer
  15. Jun 4, 00:25  Re: Limbaugh rambar
  17. Jun 4, 00:45   Excellent news Squirmer
  11. Jun 3, 23:27 Woot!!! Quaternion
  12. Jun 4, 00:01 Hell yes!!! Xombie
  19. Jun 4, 00:49 Ahh... Halsy
  20. Jun 4, 01:12  Re: Ahh...  ilian 
  23. Jun 4, 01:31   Re: Ahh... KaRRiLLioN
  25. Jun 4, 02:10    Re: Ahh... LordSteev
  24. Jun 4, 02:01   Re: Ahh... Maximus_IGN
  30. Jun 4, 04:02    Re: Ahh... SCG
  32. Jun 4, 07:37     Re: Ahh... Bronco
  34. Jun 4, 07:41      Re: Ahh... Xombie
  36. Jun 4, 08:19       Re: Ahh... Bronco
  40. Jun 4, 09:49       Re: Ahh... Valcor
  37. Jun 4, 08:46      Re: Ahh... SCG
>> 39. Jun 4, 09:43       Re: Ahh... Xombie
  42. Jun 4, 10:14        Re: Ahh... Bronco
  43. Jun 4, 12:02         Re: Ahh... Fang
  44. Jun 4, 14:13         Re: Ahh... Xombie
  45. Jun 4, 14:38          Re: Ahh... LordSteev
  46. Jun 4, 14:43          Re: Ahh... Bronco
  47. Jun 4, 14:47           Re: Ahh... Xombie
  60. Jun 5, 23:15         Re: Ahh... CultureShock
  41. Jun 4, 10:06       Re: Ahh... Bronco
  21. Jun 4, 01:23  Re: Ahh... SCG
  35. Jun 4, 08:09   Re: Ahh... 1badmf
  22. Jun 4, 01:23  Re: Ahh... darthgeezer
  33. Jun 4, 07:37  Re: Ahh... Xombie
  56. Jun 4, 23:09  Re: Ahh... Propagandhi
  26. Jun 4, 02:36 No subject wasrad
  28. Jun 4, 03:05  Re: No subject Halo
  38. Jun 4, 08:50  Re: No subject Anvil
  27. Jun 4, 03:05 There will be a part three to the story Creston
  29. Jun 4, 03:35 No subject pancreas
  31. Jun 4, 04:20 Games should be restricted to a degree Von Helmet
  49. Jun 4, 16:08  Re: Games should be restricted to a degree Sharpei Diem
  52. Jun 4, 17:00  Re: Games should be restricted to a degr Rick
  53. Jun 4, 17:52   Re: Games should be restricted to a degr Von Helmet
  54. Jun 4, 18:04   Re: Games should be restricted to a degr Xombie
  55. Jun 4, 22:35    Re: Games should be restricted to a degr anon@24.76
  58. Jun 5, 05:18     Re: Games should be restricted to a degr Von Helmet
  61. Jun 6, 00:17      Re: Games should be restricted to a degr pancreas
  62. Jun 9, 02:36       Re: Games should be restricted to a degr Phyrebird
  48. Jun 4, 15:43 No subject Bunko
  50. Jun 4, 16:12  Re: No subject KaRRiLLioN
  51. Jun 4, 16:48   Re: No subject nin
  57. Jun 5, 03:00 Thinking Ahead UnderLord
  59. Jun 5, 16:09 About time! Moog Operator


Blue's News logo