Novell on Unix: Just Say No to SCO

An article on Slashdot (thanks Mike Martinez) points the way to a Novell press release and a related News.com article called Novell challenges SCO's Linux claims that add significant complications to the recent high-profile case in which SCO sued IBM for more than $1 billion, alleging that misappropriated Unix technology has been built into Linux (story). Here's a bit on the legal tangle:
In a letter to SCO released Wednesday, Novell asserted that it retains Unix patents and copyrights, demanded that SCO reveal where Unix source code has been copied into Linux, and raised its own threat of legal action to compensate for damage that it says has been done to customers, programmers and companies using Linux.

"To Novell's knowledge, the 1995 agreement governing SCO's purchase of Unix from Novell does not convey to SCO the associated copyrights," Novell Chief Executive Jack Messman said in the letter to SCO Chief Executive Darl McBride. He said that SCO evidently realizes this, because "over the last few months you have repeatedly asked Novell to transfer the copyrights to SCO, requests that Novell has rejected."

But SCO Group said that that issue is beside the point, because the company bought full rights to the Unix intellectual property, including its copyrights, patents and the right to enforce those patents, according to Chris Sontag, head of the SCOsource effort to derive more money from the Unix intellectual property.
View : : :
7.
 
Re: Novell
May 28, 2003, 16:49
7.
Re: Novell May 28, 2003, 16:49
May 28, 2003, 16:49
 
Eh, they've been in the /. news a bit, with Netware 7 being based on the Linux kernel and all.

Date
Subject
Author
1.
May 28, 2003May 28 2003
2.
May 28, 2003May 28 2003
3.
May 28, 2003May 28 2003
4.
May 28, 2003May 28 2003
5.
May 28, 2003May 28 2003
23.
May 29, 2003May 29 2003
24.
May 29, 2003May 29 2003
6.
May 28, 2003May 28 2003
 7.
May 28, 2003May 28 2003
 Re: Novell
8.
May 28, 2003May 28 2003
9.
May 28, 2003May 28 2003
10.
May 28, 2003May 28 2003
11.
May 28, 2003May 28 2003
18.
May 28, 2003May 28 2003
16.
May 28, 2003May 28 2003
17.
May 28, 2003May 28 2003
12.
May 28, 2003May 28 2003
13.
May 28, 2003May 28 2003
14.
May 28, 2003May 28 2003
15.
May 28, 2003May 28 2003
19.
May 29, 2003May 29 2003
21.
May 29, 2003May 29 2003
22.
May 29, 2003May 29 2003
20.
May 29, 2003May 29 2003