Washington's Game Law

Washington state bans sale of violent video games to minors on CNN Money has the follow-up to reports that such a measure was being considered (story) saying that the state of Washington has indeed banned the sale to minors of computer and games that depict violence towards the police. Here's a bit:
Specifically, the law forbids selling minors any video or computer game depicting violence against law enforcement officials. Among the titles affected are industry best sellers "Grand Theft Auto 3" and "Grand Theft Auto: Vice City", both published by Take Two Interactive (TTWO: Research, Estimates). Presumably, Atari's (ATAR: Research, Estimates) $30 million "Enter the Matrix", which hit store shelves last Thursday, would also be off limits to its core audience. That title earned only a "Teen" rating, since it is not graphically violent, though police officers are in-game enemies.

Retail employees who sell these games to minors are subject to fines of up to $500.
View : : :
21.
 
employee fines?!
May 20, 2003, 23:33
21.
employee fines?! May 20, 2003, 23:33
May 20, 2003, 23:33
 
That is rediculous that they would fine an employee for selling a game to a minor. It should be the responsibility of the employer. If my job was selling games, I'd find another job. You can bet the retailers would have fought the ban if they were the ones who would be held responsible.

Date
Subject
Author
1.
May 20, 2003May 20 2003
2.
May 20, 2003May 20 2003
3.
May 20, 2003May 20 2003
10.
May 20, 2003May 20 2003
11.
May 20, 2003May 20 2003
   Re: YEY!
12.
May 20, 2003May 20 2003
   Re: YEY!
13.
May 20, 2003May 20 2003
    Re: YEY!
14.
May 20, 2003May 20 2003
     Re: YEY!
15.
May 20, 2003May 20 2003
     Re: YEY!
4.
May 20, 2003May 20 2003
5.
May 20, 2003May 20 2003
6.
May 20, 2003May 20 2003
7.
May 20, 2003May 20 2003
   Re: Huh?
8.
May 20, 2003May 20 2003
9.
May 20, 2003May 20 2003
29.
May 21, 2003May 21 2003
16.
May 20, 2003May 20 2003
17.
May 20, 2003May 20 2003
18.
May 20, 2003May 20 2003
20.
May 20, 2003May 20 2003
22.
May 20, 2003May 20 2003
19.
May 20, 2003May 20 2003
 21.
May 20, 2003May 20 2003
employee fines?!
23.
May 21, 2003May 21 2003
24.
May 21, 2003May 21 2003
25.
May 21, 2003May 21 2003
30.
May 21, 2003May 21 2003
26.
May 21, 2003May 21 2003
27.
May 21, 2003May 21 2003
28.
May 21, 2003May 21 2003
31.
May 21, 2003May 21 2003
32.
May 21, 2003May 21 2003
34.
May 21, 2003May 21 2003
33.
May 21, 2003May 21 2003
35.
May 21, 2003May 21 2003
36.
May 21, 2003May 21 2003
38.
May 21, 2003May 21 2003
39.
May 21, 2003May 21 2003
40.
May 21, 2003May 21 2003
41.
May 21, 2003May 21 2003
47.
May 21, 2003May 21 2003
48.
May 21, 2003May 21 2003
49.
May 21, 2003May 21 2003
       Re: I think it's good
50.
May 21, 2003May 21 2003
        Re: I think it's good
51.
May 21, 2003May 21 2003
         Re: I think it's good
52.
May 21, 2003May 21 2003
         Re: I think it's good
54.
May 21, 2003May 21 2003
          Re: I think it's good
56.
May 21, 2003May 21 2003
           Re: I think it's good
57.
May 21, 2003May 21 2003
            Re: I think it's good
58.
May 21, 2003May 21 2003
             Re: I think it's good
59.
May 27, 2003May 27 2003
              Re: I think it's good
37.
May 21, 2003May 21 2003
55.
May 21, 2003May 21 2003
42.
May 21, 2003May 21 2003
43.
May 21, 2003May 21 2003
44.
May 21, 2003May 21 2003
45.
May 21, 2003May 21 2003
46.
May 21, 2003May 21 2003
53.
May 21, 2003May 21 2003