Half-Life 2 Preview

Perhaps a few hours before the NDA on such content has actually expired, there's a Half-Life 2 preview on Gamesradar.com with a summary of the article in the current print issue of PC Gamer UK on the upcoming shooter sequel. The preview includes screenshots and some quotes from Valve about the project, which they say "has been in development ever since the original's release in October 1998." Here's a bit:
The new storyline has been penned by novelist Mark Laidlaw, the scriptwriter for the original Half-Life. Moreover it will span 12 chapters, each estimated at three to four hours each, making it even longer than the original game. The plot picks up an unspecified time after Half-Life and assumes, not unreasonably, that you chose to work for the sinister G-Man in the end, rather than be teleported back to the horrors of alien Xen. So now you're working for the men in black, your research papers left rotting deep within Black Mesa when you discovered your only option, bar certain death, was to become gun-bitch to a suit.
Update: It seems that the NDA Police got wind of this, and this article has now been yoinked.
View : : :
34.
 
Re: No subject
May 8, 2003, 14:16
34.
Re: No subject May 8, 2003, 14:16
May 8, 2003, 14:16
 
mmmmm, i've just woken up and been looking at this picture:

http://newtechnix.com/Webmasters/supertony/Images/News_PC_Half-Life_2_6.jpg

Doesn't that picture seem to be fiddled with? Look at that gun, it looks like a flat picture more than a 3d model...

Thought about the exact same thing when I looked at the screen. Some parts seems to be extremely high-res (soldiers head par example), while other parts are utterly-flat (gun etc).

If correct, what kind of 'double-standard', graphics wise, is that?

Date
Subject
Author
1.
May 8, 2003May 8 2003
2.
May 8, 2003May 8 2003
3.
May 8, 2003May 8 2003
  Re: FP
4.
May 8, 2003May 8 2003
5.
May 8, 2003May 8 2003
7.
May 8, 2003May 8 2003
8.
May 8, 2003May 8 2003
10.
May 8, 2003May 8 2003
    I'm dumb
11.
May 8, 2003May 8 2003
     Re: I'm dumb
13.
May 8, 2003May 8 2003
     Re: I'm dumb
14.
May 8, 2003May 8 2003
      Re: I'm dumb
18.
May 8, 2003May 8 2003
    Re: City17
19.
May 8, 2003May 8 2003
     Re: City17
52.
May 8, 2003May 8 2003
      Re: City17
54.
May 8, 2003May 8 2003
       Re: City17
55.
May 8, 2003May 8 2003
        Re: City17
17.
May 8, 2003May 8 2003
20.
May 8, 2003May 8 2003
21.
May 8, 2003May 8 2003
9.
May 8, 2003May 8 2003
12.
May 8, 2003May 8 2003
15.
May 8, 2003May 8 2003
16.
May 8, 2003May 8 2003
22.
May 8, 2003May 8 2003
23.
May 8, 2003May 8 2003
24.
May 8, 2003May 8 2003
25.
May 8, 2003May 8 2003
26.
May 8, 2003May 8 2003
27.
May 8, 2003May 8 2003
31.
May 8, 2003May 8 2003
 34.
May 8, 2003May 8 2003
    Re: No subject
28.
May 8, 2003May 8 2003
35.
May 8, 2003May 8 2003
36.
May 8, 2003May 8 2003
37.
May 8, 2003May 8 2003
     Re: No subject
38.
May 8, 2003May 8 2003
     Re: No subject
39.
May 8, 2003May 8 2003
      Re: No subject
40.
May 8, 2003May 8 2003
      Re: No subject
29.
May 8, 2003May 8 2003
30.
May 8, 2003May 8 2003
32.
May 8, 2003May 8 2003
33.
May 8, 2003May 8 2003
41.
May 8, 2003May 8 2003
42.
May 8, 2003May 8 2003
43.
May 8, 2003May 8 2003
44.
May 8, 2003May 8 2003
45.
May 8, 2003May 8 2003
46.
May 8, 2003May 8 2003
   New News!
48.
May 8, 2003May 8 2003
50.
May 8, 2003May 8 2003
47.
May 8, 2003May 8 2003
49.
May 8, 2003May 8 2003
51.
May 8, 2003May 8 2003
53.
May 8, 2003May 8 2003