Out of the Blue

Here's an unpleasant anniversary I ran across while doing a bit of poking around in the archive: Yesterday was the fourth anniversary of the school shootings in Columbine High School, which took place on April 20, 1999. :(

Stories of the Day: Who needs proof? Thanks Mike Martinez.
Why TiVo Owners Can't Shut Up (NY Times free registration required).
Wild Science: Ancient village found under Illinois soil. Thanks Mike Martinez.
Media of the Day: DJ Format. Thanks Mike.
Auction of the Day: John Carmack's Ferrari Testarossa. Thanks Jeff Wilson.
Follow-up: Tattoo of Trogdor. Thanks Gojo. A tribute to TROGDOR!!!
View : : :
45.
 
Re: Bowl O Drama
Apr 22, 2003, 12:40
45.
Re: Bowl O Drama Apr 22, 2003, 12:40
Apr 22, 2003, 12:40
 
Well, to start I'll begin by saying I haven't yet seen bowling, or any of Moore's other films, so take everything I say with a grain of salt.

In regards to the Forbes piece:

The comment that the kids didn't go bowling so the title is flawed completely misses the point. I don't think Moore (or anyone else) truly believed that the kids went nuts because they bowled that morning, but rather Moore's playing with the idea of the post hoc fallacy that just because something happens before something, it follows that the prior event was the cause of something. For example:

"I ate bacon & eggs before I got that A on the test, so therefore the bacon & eggs were what caused me to get the A"

Obviously this is ridiculous, but the mass media sure seemed to be hopping on a lot of equally ridiculous causes for Columbine (such as playing DOOM, listening to Marilyn Manson, etc). And I think the title "Bowling for Columbine" is a parody of this silliness of the mass media.

The welfare story is a valid criticism, and seems to be one that is echoed a lot by not only Moore critics, but (oddly enough) even many Moore supporters. The criticism being that Moore distorts or leaves out facts to make stories fit his point-of-view. However, I think this criticism can be leveled not only at Moore, but the vast majority of journalists as well. I'm not saying this is an excuse for Moore's actions, I'm just saying distorting/leaving out facts is more commonplace than I think a lot of people would like to believe.

The talk about the bank & the gun completely misses the point. I don't care if the bank did a background check or not, using guns as a promotional tool is truly bizarre and twisted.

There was also a commment earlier to the effect of many stabbings occuring in Britain, as to support the "guns don't kill people, people kill people" position. The thing is though, guns have no other purpose than to kill (perhaps not people, but if not people then animals). That is the relevent dissimilarity between guns, and say knives.

Anyways, sorry for the length of this post. I have a cold, and needed something to do.


PZ
PZ
------------
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Apr 21, 2003Apr 21 2003
2.
Apr 21, 2003Apr 21 2003
3.
Apr 21, 2003Apr 21 2003
4.
Apr 21, 2003Apr 21 2003
5.
Apr 21, 2003Apr 21 2003
6.
Apr 21, 2003Apr 21 2003
7.
Apr 21, 2003Apr 21 2003
     Re: No subject
15.
Apr 21, 2003Apr 21 2003
      Re: No subject
17.
Apr 21, 2003Apr 21 2003
       Re: Testarossa
18.
Apr 21, 2003Apr 21 2003
        Re: Testarossa
8.
Apr 21, 2003Apr 21 2003
     Re: No subject
9.
Apr 21, 2003Apr 21 2003
11.
Apr 21, 2003Apr 21 2003
12.
Apr 21, 2003Apr 21 2003
13.
Apr 21, 2003Apr 21 2003
19.
Apr 21, 2003Apr 21 2003
20.
Apr 21, 2003Apr 21 2003
24.
Apr 21, 2003Apr 21 2003
25.
Apr 21, 2003Apr 21 2003
28.
Apr 21, 2003Apr 21 2003
29.
Apr 21, 2003Apr 21 2003
30.
Apr 21, 2003Apr 21 2003
       Who needs proof.
40.
Apr 22, 2003Apr 22 2003
        Re: Who needs proof.
31.
Apr 21, 2003Apr 21 2003
33.
Apr 21, 2003Apr 21 2003
34.
Apr 21, 2003Apr 21 2003
         Re: [bowling for] columbine
35.
Apr 21, 2003Apr 21 2003
          Re: [bowling for] columbine
36.
Apr 21, 2003Apr 21 2003
          Re: [bowling for] columbine
37.
Apr 21, 2003Apr 21 2003
          Re: [bowling for] columbine
38.
Apr 21, 2003Apr 21 2003
          Re: [bowling for] columbine
41.
Apr 22, 2003Apr 22 2003
           Re: [bowling for] columbine
42.
Apr 22, 2003Apr 22 2003
            Re: [bowling for] columbine
43.
Apr 22, 2003Apr 22 2003
             Re: [bowling for] columbine
32.
Apr 21, 2003Apr 21 2003
10.
Apr 21, 2003Apr 21 2003
14.
Apr 21, 2003Apr 21 2003
23.
Apr 21, 2003Apr 21 2003
16.
Apr 21, 2003Apr 21 2003
21.
Apr 21, 2003Apr 21 2003
22.
Apr 21, 2003Apr 21 2003
26.
Apr 21, 2003Apr 21 2003
27.
Apr 21, 2003Apr 21 2003
39.
Apr 22, 2003Apr 22 2003
44.
Apr 22, 2003Apr 22 2003
 45.
Apr 22, 2003Apr 22 2003
  Re: Bowl O Drama
46.
Apr 22, 2003Apr 22 2003
47.
Apr 22, 2003Apr 22 2003
48.
Apr 22, 2003Apr 22 2003
49.
Apr 22, 2003Apr 22 2003
51.
Apr 22, 2003Apr 22 2003
      Re: Bowl O Drama
52.
Apr 22, 2003Apr 22 2003
50.
Apr 22, 2003Apr 22 2003
53.
Apr 22, 2003Apr 22 2003
54.
Apr 22, 2003Apr 22 2003
      Re: Bowl O Drama
55.
Apr 22, 2003Apr 22 2003
      Re: Bowl O Drama
56.
Apr 22, 2003Apr 22 2003
       Re: Bowl O Drama
57.
Apr 23, 2003Apr 23 2003
        Re: Bowl O Drama
59.
Apr 24, 2003Apr 24 2003
         Re: Bowl O Drama
60.
Apr 24, 2003Apr 24 2003
          Re: Bowl O Drama
61.
Apr 25, 2003Apr 25 2003
           Re: Bowl O Drama
62.
Apr 25, 2003Apr 25 2003
            Re: Bowl O Drama
63.
Apr 25, 2003Apr 25 2003
             Re: Bowl O Drama
65.
Apr 27, 2003Apr 27 2003
             Re: Bowl O Drama
64.
Apr 26, 2003Apr 26 2003
            Re: Bowl O Drama
58.
Apr 24, 2003Apr 24 2003
        Re: Bowl O Drama
66.
Apr 27, 2003Apr 27 2003
         Re: Bowl O Drama
67.
Apr 28, 2003Apr 28 2003
          Re: Bowl O Drama