Enter the Six Matrix CDs

Matrix Times Six? on PC.IGN.Com (thanks Ant) has details on packaging for the upcoming Matrix tie-in, reporting that the PC version will come on six CDs, saying: "Infogrames reps didn't bust out the specifics, but we do know the PC version will be somewhat pricier than its console counterparts."
View : : :
39.
 
Re: Not that bad...
Apr 15, 2003, 21:58
39.
Re: Not that bad... Apr 15, 2003, 21:58
Apr 15, 2003, 21:58
 
I don't think it's too bad. I'm guessing that the first two cds will be for installing (named installation disc 1 and 2)

And the other CDs will be labeled 1-4. You'll play through 25% of the game with cd 1. Then at 26% it will ask you for disc 2 and so on.

So it's not like your going to change the CDs every 30 minutes. Just four times through the game. And when you go and play the game later, just put the numbered cd in that your were on.

It's just like the PS1 Final Fantasy games. But they had to put duplicate game data on each of those CDs along with the FMV.

So that's how I think it will play out. Hell, it's nothing like how the Myst games are. Like in the sequel Riven, you changed the CD everytime you went from one Island to the next, so you could be changing the CD many times withen an hour.

So this whole thing with 6 cds is not that bad. Yes it would be nice if it was on DVD. But like I said, it's not bad enough to alienate customers who don't have DVD drives.

The original Matrix was released on DVD probably because it was the only way to release it at the best quality and features. So getting a DVD player wasn't as bad. But for the game, releasing it on CDs does not effect the quality of the game compared to it on a DVD, it's just data.

The price, if it did cost 3 dollars more for the CDs, I would then think they'd just sell the game still for $50 and whatever their profit was it would be 3 dollars less, 49.95 looks a lot more attractive to customers than 52.95. Seeing a 4 at the front is much more appealing than a 5, even though there's almost no difference.

Do I make any sense?

This comment was edited on Apr 15, 22:04.
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Apr 15, 2003Apr 15 2003
2.
Apr 15, 2003Apr 15 2003
3.
Apr 15, 2003Apr 15 2003
5.
Apr 15, 2003Apr 15 2003
  Re: !
7.
Apr 15, 2003Apr 15 2003
8.
Apr 15, 2003Apr 15 2003
9.
Apr 15, 2003Apr 15 2003
14.
Apr 15, 2003Apr 15 2003
10.
Apr 15, 2003Apr 15 2003
4.
Apr 15, 2003Apr 15 2003
6.
Apr 15, 2003Apr 15 2003
  Re: !
28.
Apr 15, 2003Apr 15 2003
29.
Apr 15, 2003Apr 15 2003
30.
Apr 15, 2003Apr 15 2003
31.
Apr 15, 2003Apr 15 2003
32.
Apr 15, 2003Apr 15 2003
37.
Apr 15, 2003Apr 15 2003
33.
Apr 15, 2003Apr 15 2003
34.
Apr 15, 2003Apr 15 2003
35.
Apr 15, 2003Apr 15 2003
36.
Apr 15, 2003Apr 15 2003
38.
Apr 15, 2003Apr 15 2003
       Re: Not that bad...
 39.
Apr 15, 2003Apr 15 2003
        Re: Not that bad...
41.
Apr 15, 2003Apr 15 2003
         Re: Not that bad...
42.
Apr 15, 2003Apr 15 2003
         Re: Not that bad...
44.
Apr 15, 2003Apr 15 2003
          Re: Not that bad...
45.
Apr 15, 2003Apr 15 2003
           Re: Not that bad...
56.
Apr 16, 2003Apr 16 2003
            Re: Not that bad...
57.
Apr 16, 2003Apr 16 2003
             Vice City - off topic but what the hell
63.
Apr 16, 2003Apr 16 2003
64.
Apr 16, 2003Apr 16 2003
               Re: Vice City - off topic but what the hell
65.
Apr 16, 2003Apr 16 2003
                Re: Vice City - off topic but what the hell
50.
Apr 16, 2003Apr 16 2003
          Re: Not that bad...
51.
Apr 16, 2003Apr 16 2003
           Re: Not that bad...
43.
Apr 15, 2003Apr 15 2003
         Re: Not that bad...
40.
Apr 15, 2003Apr 15 2003
        What about a Demo...
71.
Apr 17, 2003Apr 17 2003
74.
Apr 17, 2003Apr 17 2003
75.
Apr 17, 2003Apr 17 2003
11.
Apr 15, 2003Apr 15 2003
12.
Apr 15, 2003Apr 15 2003
13.
Apr 15, 2003Apr 15 2003
15.
Apr 15, 2003Apr 15 2003
16.
Apr 15, 2003Apr 15 2003
17.
Apr 15, 2003Apr 15 2003
18.
Apr 15, 2003Apr 15 2003
20.
Apr 15, 2003Apr 15 2003
     Re: No subject
21.
Apr 15, 2003Apr 15 2003
      Re: No subject
19.
Apr 15, 2003Apr 15 2003
22.
Apr 15, 2003Apr 15 2003
27.
Apr 15, 2003Apr 15 2003
23.
Apr 15, 2003Apr 15 2003
24.
Apr 15, 2003Apr 15 2003
25.
Apr 15, 2003Apr 15 2003
26.
Apr 15, 2003Apr 15 2003
46.
Apr 15, 2003Apr 15 2003
47.
Apr 15, 2003Apr 15 2003
48.
Apr 15, 2003Apr 15 2003
49.
Apr 15, 2003Apr 15 2003
52.
Apr 16, 2003Apr 16 2003
53.
Apr 16, 2003Apr 16 2003
54.
Apr 16, 2003Apr 16 2003
55.
Apr 16, 2003Apr 16 2003
58.
Apr 16, 2003Apr 16 2003
60.
Apr 16, 2003Apr 16 2003
59.
Apr 16, 2003Apr 16 2003
61.
Apr 16, 2003Apr 16 2003
62.
Apr 16, 2003Apr 16 2003
66.
Apr 16, 2003Apr 16 2003
67.
Apr 16, 2003Apr 16 2003
68.
Apr 16, 2003Apr 16 2003
69.
Apr 16, 2003Apr 16 2003
70.
Apr 17, 2003Apr 17 2003
72.
Apr 17, 2003Apr 17 2003
77.
Apr 18, 2003Apr 18 2003
     Re: Erm.......
78.
Apr 18, 2003Apr 18 2003
      Re: Erm.......
79.
Apr 18, 2003Apr 18 2003
       Re: Erm.......
73.
Apr 17, 2003Apr 17 2003
76.
Apr 17, 2003Apr 17 2003
80.
Apr 19, 2003Apr 19 2003
82.
Apr 19, 2003Apr 19 2003
83.
Apr 19, 2003Apr 19 2003
87.
Apr 22, 2003Apr 22 2003
88.
Apr 22, 2003Apr 22 2003
89.
Apr 22, 2003Apr 22 2003
81.
Apr 19, 2003Apr 19 2003
84.
Apr 20, 2003Apr 20 2003
85.
Apr 20, 2003Apr 20 2003
86.
Apr 21, 2003Apr 21 2003