he was giving an interview on Fox.

Its called Television. Its been around a bit longer than the internet...If you want to try maybe you can find it on the Fox website, or maybe they will show him again. Maybe if you ask Rick Leventhal himself he can tell you...is that an okay source?

Just so you know, not all "sources" are on the web...there IS a world out there ya know, check it out sometime.

BTW for all you idiots defending the way Americans are dressed can I just ask how come there have been more British troops killed by Americans than by Iraqis. Maybe if you took some of those stupid clothes off you could see who you're shooting!

Well, for all you idiots asking stupid completely out-of-context questions since you think you know so much about it because you are in the shit of course, I will give you an equally stupid answer. Because they were in the way? How about this one....To get to the other side? Or maybe you like this one...Because they could?

CIA estimates between 80,000 and 100,000 thousand Iraqi soldiers and paramilitaries dead. US casualties are barely over 100...that would be about a 1000 to 1 kill ratio...so, for those stupid enough to even have to ask about the way the Americans dress for war, pull your head out of your neighbor's ass and get a clue.

You are just jealous because the US military COMPLETELY OWNS. Its tough living in the ONLY nation that is a superpower Of course I guess it would really suck living in some other country that has to kiss ass. You can kiss all the ass you want....we kick ass, you kiss it. Make love not war and all that....whatever.

This comment was edited on Apr 11, 21:42.

Interesting, but Google News can't find anything about this.

In fact, the only thing it finds is a BRITISH marine, shot four times in his helmet, who lived. But he wasn't giving an interview at the time.

Sources please? I'd like to read about this.

I restarted last night and played through about the first 6 levels and found it pretty good. The AI on your buddies is still a bit of a problem - they tend to get stuck in tight places. I also have seen bad guys running in slow motion ocassionaly but hey at least you get to shoot Americans in silly combat armor.

BTW for all you idiots defending the way Americans are dressed can I just ask how come there have been more British troops killed by Americans than by Iraqis. Maybe if you took some of those stupid clothes off you could see who you're shooting!

I ask the question yet again...

Anyone able to comment on what this really does for all the single player bugs ?

I have been having a good time playing the multiplayer demo. I am wondering how the singleplayer is after the patch. Still buggy, or quite enjoyable?

Thanks

Cock climber you didnt see about the US Marine reservist in Baghdad that took a 7.62 mm round to his helmet and it didnt penetrate...he was giving an interview on Fox.

I'd rather have the cool soldiers make fun of the way Uncle Sam dresses ours if ours can take rounds to their body armor and helmets and not be harmed.

As far as the soldiers behavior it seems pretty right-on to me....there have already been several incidents of women and children involved in attacks on the soldiers in some way or another.

I guess I don't understand why people actually make the effort to jump in to forums and rip apart a game. It seems like a waste of energy...if you don't like a game, return it, and move on with your life...

The reason for this is very simple: There are people who want other people to save money instead of wasting it for unfinished products!

* REMOVED *
This comment was deleted on Apr 11, 07:08.

yo yo yo

americans read this

http://www.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,6230427%5E26277,00.html

I guess I don't understand why people actually make the effort to jump in to forums and rip apart a game. It seems like a waste of energy...if you don't like a game, return it, and move on with your life...

...or maybe that's the problem. No life. Guess I'll never understand it. 'nuff said

tell us how you really feel Dr.Del...

* REMOVED *
This comment was deleted on Apr 10, 17:43.

... but no patch can fix this game and make it somewhat enjoyable.

This comment was edited on Apr 10, 15:11.

TangledThorns: The only thing that you and I have in common... is that neither of us knows what the hell you're talking about. Blizzard's games are among the highest quality games. Their many patches are primarily for balancing purposes.

Unmaker, you have just been PwN3D. Please move your cursor underneath the post you responded to. Ha ha

That patch is bigger than Half-Life patches with TFC and their other two mods. I hope to god that large size includes some hit animations. I hate playing multiplayer and not knowing if I actually hit someone in my lag, blood is useless in that sense.

I've seen bigger patches. 66MB is nothing and you people need to stop whining. BOOHOO

Dan
Intel 486SX, Trident video, 8MB RAM, 14" Generic Monitor, 100 MB HDD, Windows 3.11

TangledThorns: The only thing that you and I have in common... is that neither of us knows what the hell you're talking about. Blizzard's games are among the highest quality games. Their many patches are primarily for balancing purposes.

They replaced a ton of sounds, including all the weapon sounds. That probably represents a good bit of the size.

That has got to be the biggest release patch ever! I'm just curious as to what was exactly fixed. At least its not as buggy as Warcraft 3. Blizzard sure does make some shoddy games.

you're a n00b if you flamed me, ha ha, 0wn3d

The bad release might unfortunatly have killed this game.

The patched version is what SHOULD have been released.

It is unfortunate for Digitalo, seeing at how hard game devs work on their products. But someone made an error somewhere to have such a buggy product ship.

The MP is enjoyable. Now if only more servers can pop-up .

This comment was edited on Apr 10, 12:21.

Man, that's a HUGE patch. Usually when patches are that big they also offer some sort of additional content. What could they've possibly screwed up that requires a patch of this size? Looks like the dialup users (both of them) are in for a bit of a wait.