Out of the Blue [Mar 20, 2003, 06:57 am ET] – Share – Viewing Comments
| Play Time: | Move Your Feet (Shockwave required). Thanks Nick Brigden. |
| Links of the Day: | Cannot find server make your time. Thanks Berklee. All your 404 error belong to us. |
| Stories of the Day: | Smothers Brother's son is porn star.
Thanks Chuck! A web of cheating. Thanks Mike Martinez. Iraq war could send German cars in wrong direction. Thanks Mike Martinez. |
| Wild Science: | Riddle of 'Baghdad's batteries'.
Thanks crazy0ne. Cat on the Cutting Edge. Thanks Mike Martinez. |
| Weird Science: | Secret to sleep is to have sex about five times a week. Thanks Bob James. |
| Images of the Day: | Bubbacomp.
Thanks Mike Martinez. Digital Eel GDC Mystery Tour 2003. |
Thank you for showing that you can have a civil discussion. I sincerely hope it continues.
I never said Bush is a bumbling idiot trying to finish "Daddy's" war, but I do find it interesting the Bush Sr spoke at a college a few weeks before the war and said his son should back off and listen to the world leaders. He said that the case for WOMD could be debated and that's it's not as clear cut as it was in 1991. He also said that Bush should not go against the UN. Here's the link: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-605441,00.html
Yes, we must have some faith in our elected leaders, but we must also question their actions and their motives. That is what I am doing, and that is what I think is lacking from most people who support the war. You better have a damn good reason to invade another country and so far we have not been presented with that reason. I don't think it's right to believe them just because they are our leaders. If they have the proof then show it. Leaders have lied to their citizens since the dawn of civilization, why would it be any different today?
Also, the rest of the world should have pretty much the same intellegence reports that we did, especially since the one that Powell took to the UN was plagerized from a collge students report that is over 12 years old. Why are they opposed to the war?
This comment was edited on Apr 11, 20:37.
I never said Bush is a bumbling idiot trying to finish "Daddy's" war, but I do find it interesting the Bush Sr spoke at a college a few weeks before the war and said his son should back off and listen to the world leaders. He said that the case for WOMD could be debated and that's it's not as clear cut as it was in 1991. He also said that Bush should not go against the UN. Here's the link: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-605441,00.html
Yes, we must have some faith in our elected leaders, but we must also question their actions and their motives. That is what I am doing, and that is what I think is lacking from most people who support the war. You better have a damn good reason to invade another country and so far we have not been presented with that reason. I don't think it's right to believe them just because they are our leaders. If they have the proof then show it. Leaders have lied to their citizens since the dawn of civilization, why would it be any different today?
Also, the rest of the world should have pretty much the same intellegence reports that we did, especially since the one that Powell took to the UN was plagerized from a collge students report that is over 12 years old. Why are they opposed to the war?
This comment was edited on Apr 11, 20:37.
Date
Subject
Author
Copyright © 1996-2025 Stephen Heaslip. All rights reserved.
All trademarks are properties of their respective owners.
Privacy Policy. Manage Cookie Settings.
News CGI copyright © 1999-2025 James "furn" Furness & Blue's News. All rights reserved.
Chatbear v1.5.0/blue++: Page generated 13 July 2025, 00:44.