Out of the Blue [Mar 20, 2003, 06:57 am ET] – Share – Viewing Comments
| Play Time: | Move Your Feet (Shockwave required). Thanks Nick Brigden. |
| Links of the Day: | Cannot find server make your time. Thanks Berklee. All your 404 error belong to us. |
| Stories of the Day: | Smothers Brother's son is porn star.
Thanks Chuck! A web of cheating. Thanks Mike Martinez. Iraq war could send German cars in wrong direction. Thanks Mike Martinez. |
| Wild Science: | Riddle of 'Baghdad's batteries'.
Thanks crazy0ne. Cat on the Cutting Edge. Thanks Mike Martinez. |
| Weird Science: | Secret to sleep is to have sex about five times a week. Thanks Bob James. |
| Images of the Day: | Bubbacomp.
Thanks Mike Martinez. Digital Eel GDC Mystery Tour 2003. |
-Babar Why Iraq, why now? Saddam hasn't been a threat to anybody in 12 years. Why the sudden need to remove him from power? Why aren't we focused on Bin Laden, someone who supposedly orchestrated 9/11, instead of Saddam? Isn't Bin Laden supposed to be a bigger threat to our way of life than Saddam is?
Didn't you get the point of my last post? Are you even reading what I have to say? The reason why we didn't do anything is because we had a democratic President in office! The U.N. had monitors in Rwanda at the time, but they didn't do anything or report anything until blood and body parts started floating down the river. Is any of this getting into you thick skull? The U.N is useless and I'm glad they're going to be taking a back seat to the rebuilding of Iraq.
-Pedle Zelnip There are no winners in war....it may sometimes be necessary...or it might just happen...but no one really wins...
Yes, there is, the Iraq people will be the winners.
-I'd probably be more comfortable with a statement to the effect of "as soon as the US stops behaving irresponsibly" or "as soon as the US stops setting this dangerous precedent of invading without UN consent". So I agree with your position, I just have trouble with the "illegal" label.
The US has a right to defend itself against being attacked, or any other country that it deems as a threat.
It's great they are invading Iraq, the world will now know, not to screw with the US, and that we're not a bunch of pussie like Bin ladin thought we were. We're not just going to lob a few bombs like Clinton did(to take attention away from Monica) we are going to go in and kick some ass. The direct benefit will be that countries will now think twice about supporting terrorism. It doesn't help our resolve to have a bunch of pussies like you arguing over it! This is exactly what the Saddams in this world are hoping for, is a weak resolve that you folks have to defend what you hold dear, you guys would probably turn in your own mothers.
-Of course if in fact Coalition countries such as the US or Britain are in possession of these "illegal" WMD as well, then the whole argument of "we must disarm Saddam, he's got illegal WMD" goes out the window.
The US does not possess any of these bio/chem weapons in their arsenal(other than for research purposes), they are not even on the table. If you think this isn't true send me a link to a factual document disputing this(one that isn't from one of you loony tunes left wing propaganda mags)
P.S. Some peace marchers were shot with rubber bullets cause they were getting violent("peace" marchers<---what a joke), I love that shit.
-Spanker has Spankend, crash and burn you liberal commies!
This comment was edited on Apr 7, 14:23.
Didn't you get the point of my last post? Are you even reading what I have to say? The reason why we didn't do anything is because we had a democratic President in office! The U.N. had monitors in Rwanda at the time, but they didn't do anything or report anything until blood and body parts started floating down the river. Is any of this getting into you thick skull? The U.N is useless and I'm glad they're going to be taking a back seat to the rebuilding of Iraq.
-Pedle Zelnip There are no winners in war....it may sometimes be necessary...or it might just happen...but no one really wins...
Yes, there is, the Iraq people will be the winners.
-I'd probably be more comfortable with a statement to the effect of "as soon as the US stops behaving irresponsibly" or "as soon as the US stops setting this dangerous precedent of invading without UN consent". So I agree with your position, I just have trouble with the "illegal" label.
The US has a right to defend itself against being attacked, or any other country that it deems as a threat.
It's great they are invading Iraq, the world will now know, not to screw with the US, and that we're not a bunch of pussie like Bin ladin thought we were. We're not just going to lob a few bombs like Clinton did(to take attention away from Monica) we are going to go in and kick some ass. The direct benefit will be that countries will now think twice about supporting terrorism. It doesn't help our resolve to have a bunch of pussies like you arguing over it! This is exactly what the Saddams in this world are hoping for, is a weak resolve that you folks have to defend what you hold dear, you guys would probably turn in your own mothers.
-Of course if in fact Coalition countries such as the US or Britain are in possession of these "illegal" WMD as well, then the whole argument of "we must disarm Saddam, he's got illegal WMD" goes out the window.
The US does not possess any of these bio/chem weapons in their arsenal(other than for research purposes), they are not even on the table. If you think this isn't true send me a link to a factual document disputing this(one that isn't from one of you loony tunes left wing propaganda mags)
P.S. Some peace marchers were shot with rubber bullets cause they were getting violent("peace" marchers<---what a joke), I love that shit.
-Spanker has Spankend, crash and burn you liberal commies!
This comment was edited on Apr 7, 14:23.
Date
Subject
Author
Copyright © 1996-2025 Stephen Heaslip. All rights reserved.
All trademarks are properties of their respective owners.
Privacy Policy. Manage Cookie Settings.
News CGI copyright © 1999-2025 James "furn" Furness & Blue's News. All rights reserved.
Chatbear v1.5.0/blue++: Page generated 14 July 2025, 08:51.