Out of the Blue

Bush Signs Anti-Telemarketing Bill (thanks eurodeseo|OSLT) has the good news that some relief from the scourge of telemarketing, as it will create a do-not-call list, with the punishment for calling listed people to be a fine of up to $11,000 for each violation. Of course, there's always a loophole, and the politicians were certainly not going to curtail their own ability to pester us, so: "Charities, surveys and calls on behalf of politicians would be exempt." I can only suspect the worst of this last part: 'Hi, I'm calling on behalf of the U.S. Congress to offer you a way to lower your mortgage rate.'

Link of the Day: Ted Turner Sends Self Back In Time To Prevent AOL Time Warner Merger. Thanks [PIT]SlayerAODsk.
Stories of the Day: French Fries Get New Name in Congress. Thanks Borzoi.
Groundhog Day: The Musical. Thanks loonyboi. "Tomorrow, tomorrow, I love you tomorrow, you're also always today."
HBO countersues 'Sopranos' star Gandolfini for $100M. Thanks David.
Weird Science: Gauging age by the smell of urine. Thanks [MP] Wolverine [MP].
Wild Science: Universe as Doughnut: New Data, New Debate (NY Times free registration required). Thanks Mark Siegel.
Media of the Day: Trunk Monkey. Thanks Ant.
Demo. Thanks [PIT]SlayerAODsk.
Beer Is Good For You? Thanks Homer.
Auction of the Day: Instant Girlfriend Kit! Thanks [PIT]SlayerAODsk.
View : : :
86.
 
Boohoohoo, poor widdle Dud
Mar 15, 2003, 11:39
86.
Boohoohoo, poor widdle Dud Mar 15, 2003, 11:39
Mar 15, 2003, 11:39
 
Dud, please drop the Hanibal Lector routine. You DONT know ANYTHING about me and claiming to know anything about me based on my posts in this thread just proves that you are a fool. Why? Because it shows that instead of using facts and logic you use emotions and suspicions. You have already proved that you cannot back up what you say. If all you can do is post how right you are but show nothing to back it up, you are a TROLL, plain and simple (regardless of your opinion).

Since you are too pussy to respond to me I am glad you respond to DrEvil at least...it gives me yet another opportunity to show how moronic you are.

And without further delay...

1) Korean War: if not for the US bombing campaign on the North Korea the US could not have stalled the terrestrial battle. The chinese/ korean soldiers night fighting was simply superior.

DIPSHIT. You have NO idea what you are talking about here. Good thing that non-proliferation traty created the DMZ and ended the Korean War, right moron? LMAO@Dud!!! If you ever care to check your history before spewing crap you would understand that the US was kicking the North Koreans asses until McArthur crossed the 38th Parrallel and then the Chinese came flooding in across the border. They were NOT better fighters, they were NOT better trained, and the they were NOT better equipped. They simply VASTLY outnumbered the UN forces. If that equates to being better in your wee little brain than so be it.

2) Vietnam: if not for Air Calvery and the mounted M60, Cobra's with rockets and discovery of Napalm combined with killing civilians. Ground war, the US just couldn't do it. the vietcong were more battle weary and operated better as small units and kicked ass in jungle fighting. US too high and too many lies

First off DIPSHIT napalm wasnt "discovered" in Vietnam, it was used heavily in the Pacific during WW2. I would think a super veteran like yourself would know some of these things, especially one that aced everything they did while in the military (unless you are just so completely full of shit which I am starting to think is the case).

Second, the Vietnamese had been fighting off outsiders for over 50 years at that point...they already had a very intricate tunnel system and they were well supplied. Again, get your "Facts" straight.

3) Afghanistan: the US Special Forces couldn't even come close to beating Afghan soldier/ mixxed with Taliban (granted the Taliban was a sad situation) if not for HEAVY HEAVY bombing.

And you know this how? Since we DID use heavy bombing and we DID kick ass, there is absolutely no way to KNOW what WOULD HAVE happened, unless you have gone from Hanibal Lector to Miss Cleo. Moron.

4) Mogedishu: who do you really believe?

Not you, thats for sure. I believe the TRUTH. Still, opinion is not fact...learn it, live it.

5) Gulf War: US soldiers always have air support at telescopic view.. never have to enter the theater except for cleanup.

OK, and the Iraqis were surrendering to recon drones...I think they knew the recon drones could kick their asses even. Since the US DID have air power here then you cant say what WOULD HAVE happened, Miss Cleo, because you just DONT KNOW. You are a complete shit-for-brains.

6) matter of fact the Isreals have the edge due to aircraft. tanks are vulnerable in structured areas. blow a tank track off and you've got problems

Thanks for yet another comment that has nothing to do with anything that anyone is talking about. You WERE talking about the US military, remember Dud?

Dr. evil I don't need to link evidence.. it's common knowledge.

Or maybe you CANT because there is no evidence. I thought you were over the thread cliches there Dud, but then you go ahead and say something hella-lame like "I dont need to...its common knowledge". Yeah, so common that you are the only one that "knows" the "facts"...LOL@Dud

I have figured out your tactics here Dud. Troll a little, run away and hide like a bitch and let someone with a little bit of brains take up your argument, then when THEY lose you come back and troll some more but you try to change the subject. Its not working.

Duds famous quotes:

On the non-proliferation treaty that ended the Korean conflict;

The non-proliferation treaty was not a surrender it was simply a peace time treaty due to N. Koreas weak status... not a declaration of defeat you stinking pig head jerk.

On Elizabeth Smart being found alive;

and what the HELL are you talking about "Elizabeth Smart???"
now I know you're a total lacky fool.. that was Chandra Levy

"GEEEEEEEZ???????????"

this is why you are a poster child that represents the percentage of americans that don't know SHIT except what's the lastest tennis shoe on the market.. GET YOUR FACTS straight

On the Bush assasination of congressmen (HUH? Whatever);

George Bush had his goons remove that congress man in Minnesota that was publicly against his agenda and he as well as his entire family was lost in a suspect plane crash

And what is Dud's 'question'? You decide;

Is it "A"
are we Free? that is the question..

Is it "B"
So we arrive back at the question: who has the right to own destructive weapons?

Or is it "C" : Dud has no idea what he is talking about, neither does anyone else

NEXT

MAIN PC (for Soupkin)
=======
Asus A7N8X Deluxe
AMD Barton 2800
1024 Meg Corsair XMS PC3200 CAS2(2x512 in Dual Channel)
ATI Radeon 9700 Pro
Maxtor 40 Gig 7200 RPM ATA133
Maxtor 60 Gig 7200 RPM ATA133
350W Power Supply
Windows XP Home
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
2.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
6.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
 Re:
3.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
4.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
5.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
7.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
8.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
13.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
17.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
32.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
9.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
10.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
12.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
21.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
22.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
23.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
24.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
30.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
28.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
33.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
38.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
     WoMD
63.
Mar 13, 2003Mar 13 2003
      Re: WoMD
64.
Mar 13, 2003Mar 13 2003
       Re: WoMD
68.
Mar 13, 2003Mar 13 2003
       Re: WoMD
25.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
26.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
56.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
57.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
58.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
59.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
60.
Mar 13, 2003Mar 13 2003
61.
Mar 13, 2003Mar 13 2003
11.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
14.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
15.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
16.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
18.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
19.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
20.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
27.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
31.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
34.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
42.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
62.
Mar 13, 2003Mar 13 2003
    Re: to Craw
29.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
35.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
36.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
39.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
43.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
45.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
37.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
41.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
44.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
46.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
48.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
51.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
52.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
54.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
55.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
40.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
47.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
49.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
50.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
53.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
65.
Mar 13, 2003Mar 13 2003
66.
Mar 13, 2003Mar 13 2003
67.
Mar 13, 2003Mar 13 2003
69.
Mar 13, 2003Mar 13 2003
70.
Mar 13, 2003Mar 13 2003
73.
Mar 13, 2003Mar 13 2003
74.
Mar 13, 2003Mar 13 2003
71.
Mar 13, 2003Mar 13 2003
72.
Mar 13, 2003Mar 13 2003
75.
Mar 14, 2003Mar 14 2003
76.
Mar 14, 2003Mar 14 2003
77.
Mar 14, 2003Mar 14 2003
78.
Mar 14, 2003Mar 14 2003
79.
Mar 14, 2003Mar 14 2003
80.
Mar 14, 2003Mar 14 2003
 Re:
81.
Mar 15, 2003Mar 15 2003
  Re:
82.
Mar 15, 2003Mar 15 2003
   Re:
83.
Mar 15, 2003Mar 15 2003
    Re:
85.
Mar 15, 2003Mar 15 2003
     Re:
 86.
Mar 15, 2003Mar 15 2003
      Boohoohoo, poor widdle Dud
91.
Mar 15, 2003Mar 15 2003
84.
Mar 15, 2003Mar 15 2003
    Re:
87.
Mar 15, 2003Mar 15 2003
88.
Mar 15, 2003Mar 15 2003
89.
Mar 15, 2003Mar 15 2003
90.
Mar 15, 2003Mar 15 2003
92.
Mar 15, 2003Mar 15 2003
93.
Mar 16, 2003Mar 16 2003
94.
Mar 16, 2003Mar 16 2003