Out of the Blue

Bush Signs Anti-Telemarketing Bill (thanks eurodeseo|OSLT) has the good news that some relief from the scourge of telemarketing, as it will create a do-not-call list, with the punishment for calling listed people to be a fine of up to $11,000 for each violation. Of course, there's always a loophole, and the politicians were certainly not going to curtail their own ability to pester us, so: "Charities, surveys and calls on behalf of politicians would be exempt." I can only suspect the worst of this last part: 'Hi, I'm calling on behalf of the U.S. Congress to offer you a way to lower your mortgage rate.'

Link of the Day: Ted Turner Sends Self Back In Time To Prevent AOL Time Warner Merger. Thanks [PIT]SlayerAODsk.
Stories of the Day: French Fries Get New Name in Congress. Thanks Borzoi.
Groundhog Day: The Musical. Thanks loonyboi. "Tomorrow, tomorrow, I love you tomorrow, you're also always today."
HBO countersues 'Sopranos' star Gandolfini for $100M. Thanks David.
Weird Science: Gauging age by the smell of urine. Thanks [MP] Wolverine [MP].
Wild Science: Universe as Doughnut: New Data, New Debate (NY Times free registration required). Thanks Mark Siegel.
Media of the Day: Trunk Monkey. Thanks Ant.
Demo. Thanks [PIT]SlayerAODsk.
Beer Is Good For You? Thanks Homer.
Auction of the Day: Instant Girlfriend Kit! Thanks [PIT]SlayerAODsk.
View : : :
81.
 
Re:
Mar 15, 2003, 00:44
81.
Re: Mar 15, 2003, 00:44
Mar 15, 2003, 00:44
 
read my redressing of my #79 post. Turd

"I made my points!" C-O-N-J-E-C-T-U-R-E is what it's fashionably called. Which you can't seem to address accurately stupid fucking Idiot. and FYI??? the US forged the creation of the UN and the UN's headquarter's *IS* in NYC. You frog fart sucking dimwit. So I'd say that about places me in the right latitude as to whom formed the charter for placing sanctions.

6'2 and filled with shit to your eyes. do your eyes hurt?

Unfortunately you are a tad myopic when comes to having some familiarity with the depth of issues abroad...

You are such a fool because I am purposely not elaberating at great length due to the cerebral challegene you exist in I woud want to waste my time informing a fool on the value of knowledge. A typical: "I'm an American and proud of it!"

I can tell because you really don't know how to focus on the after thought of C-O-N-S-E-Q-U-E-N-C-E-S.. that's common in the behavior of chimpanzies and government when just start learning how to climb trees and fall on their asses.

and let me answer your whyism regarding Mr. Rumsfeld. You have no clue because like I referenced to your cut & paste peanut sized monkey brain you are of the same genus.. not genius

here's your answer along with your banana slices chim chim. Rumsfeld is a throughback liken to the Darwinian classification of Neanderthal.. which I'm sure you are very familair with ??? You see it everyday when you look in the mirror.

Rumsfeld can only see the light of progress in a neolithic wayward red-neck candy snatching power hungry suited primate. He simple believes that the US has the right to do what ever it wants and can step passed/ look passed any country here or far. Much like yourself.

I'll test you since you and your girlfirend seem to be amused.. maksud aku bicara.. punyamu perempaun mua seks untuk ada orangatang.. itu ini kamu "HA HA HA!" this is an old langauge. figure it out. This culture was once dominated long ago.

As for your NEXT comment.. You definetly are behind me monkey boy.

P.S. you asked: I would also love to see what you have to say about the non-proliferation treaty that created the Korean DMZ...or any of that other crap that I have already made fun of you for in post #67.

my response is... oder mein antwort: I never said that the Korean DMZ was established by way of *that* treaty. Two totally different event. Sie misreading grosse misthaufen. a little german for you.

by the way shit for brains.. I served in South Korea near the DMZ... not fun .. but I breezed thru it.

you are truely a super star for pilfering the truth

WHAT'S NEXT?
-The Dude-

Vic B.
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
2.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
6.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
 Re:
3.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
4.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
5.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
7.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
8.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
13.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
17.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
32.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
9.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
10.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
12.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
21.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
22.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
23.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
24.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
30.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
28.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
33.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
38.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
     WoMD
63.
Mar 13, 2003Mar 13 2003
      Re: WoMD
64.
Mar 13, 2003Mar 13 2003
       Re: WoMD
68.
Mar 13, 2003Mar 13 2003
       Re: WoMD
25.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
26.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
56.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
57.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
58.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
59.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
60.
Mar 13, 2003Mar 13 2003
61.
Mar 13, 2003Mar 13 2003
11.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
14.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
15.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
16.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
18.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
19.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
20.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
27.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
31.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
34.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
42.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
62.
Mar 13, 2003Mar 13 2003
    Re: to Craw
29.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
35.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
36.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
39.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
43.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
45.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
37.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
41.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
44.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
46.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
48.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
51.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
52.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
54.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
55.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
40.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
47.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
49.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
50.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
53.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
65.
Mar 13, 2003Mar 13 2003
66.
Mar 13, 2003Mar 13 2003
67.
Mar 13, 2003Mar 13 2003
69.
Mar 13, 2003Mar 13 2003
70.
Mar 13, 2003Mar 13 2003
73.
Mar 13, 2003Mar 13 2003
74.
Mar 13, 2003Mar 13 2003
71.
Mar 13, 2003Mar 13 2003
72.
Mar 13, 2003Mar 13 2003
75.
Mar 14, 2003Mar 14 2003
76.
Mar 14, 2003Mar 14 2003
77.
Mar 14, 2003Mar 14 2003
78.
Mar 14, 2003Mar 14 2003
79.
Mar 14, 2003Mar 14 2003
80.
Mar 14, 2003Mar 14 2003
 Re:
 81.
Mar 15, 2003Mar 15 2003
  Re:
82.
Mar 15, 2003Mar 15 2003
   Re:
83.
Mar 15, 2003Mar 15 2003
    Re:
85.
Mar 15, 2003Mar 15 2003
     Re:
86.
Mar 15, 2003Mar 15 2003
91.
Mar 15, 2003Mar 15 2003
84.
Mar 15, 2003Mar 15 2003
    Re:
87.
Mar 15, 2003Mar 15 2003
88.
Mar 15, 2003Mar 15 2003
89.
Mar 15, 2003Mar 15 2003
90.
Mar 15, 2003Mar 15 2003
92.
Mar 15, 2003Mar 15 2003
93.
Mar 16, 2003Mar 16 2003
94.
Mar 16, 2003Mar 16 2003