Out of the Blue

Bush Signs Anti-Telemarketing Bill (thanks eurodeseo|OSLT) has the good news that some relief from the scourge of telemarketing, as it will create a do-not-call list, with the punishment for calling listed people to be a fine of up to $11,000 for each violation. Of course, there's always a loophole, and the politicians were certainly not going to curtail their own ability to pester us, so: "Charities, surveys and calls on behalf of politicians would be exempt." I can only suspect the worst of this last part: 'Hi, I'm calling on behalf of the U.S. Congress to offer you a way to lower your mortgage rate.'

Link of the Day: Ted Turner Sends Self Back In Time To Prevent AOL Time Warner Merger. Thanks [PIT]SlayerAODsk.
Stories of the Day: French Fries Get New Name in Congress. Thanks Borzoi.
Groundhog Day: The Musical. Thanks loonyboi. "Tomorrow, tomorrow, I love you tomorrow, you're also always today."
HBO countersues 'Sopranos' star Gandolfini for $100M. Thanks David.
Weird Science: Gauging age by the smell of urine. Thanks [MP] Wolverine [MP].
Wild Science: Universe as Doughnut: New Data, New Debate (NY Times free registration required). Thanks Mark Siegel.
Media of the Day: Trunk Monkey. Thanks Ant.
Demo. Thanks [PIT]SlayerAODsk.
Beer Is Good For You? Thanks Homer.
Auction of the Day: Instant Girlfriend Kit! Thanks [PIT]SlayerAODsk.
View : : :
80.
 
Re:
Mar 14, 2003, 23:37
80.
Re: Mar 14, 2003, 23:37
Mar 14, 2003, 23:37
 
YODA! How ya been?

I thought you just turned tail and ran like the little bitch you are after I made a mockery of your previous post....wasnt hard, it was a bunch of crap and you seem to agree since you couldnt defend ANY of it.

First off let me just say that I am SOOOOOOOOOOO impressed with your whole shpeel about being in the service. Good for you. Too bad you are still a dipshit and that being in the service or bullshitting has absolutely not one single thing to do with the thread. Anyway, congrats...glad you're out if you were ever in, I'd hate to think there were pussies like you on the lines right now.

So we arrive back at the question: who has the right to own destructive weapons?

Well I am so glad we have finally arrived at your question. Long trip. Now if you only had an answer...

Oh and tell me something *Genius*.. Why is it Mr. Rumsfeld seems to have this strange ability to loose control of his rational faculties?

Hmmm....I dunno. Why is it Mr. Rumsfeld seems to have this strange ability to loose control of his rational faculties?

Hey I got one. Why did the chicken cross the road?

Dud, WTF are you talking about? Tell you what, next time I am talking to Mr. Rumsfeld's shrink I will be sure and ask. This is relevant how?

As for Iraq.. dipshit.. did you forget that the US and England have imposed Stalin-like sanctions on Iraq

No. You forgot that these sanctions were imposed by your beloved U.N. that works wonders to solve all the world's problems. Get your history straight, dipshit. And what the hell is Stalin-like sanctions? Never thought of Stalin as a big player in the whole 'sanctions' thing...whatever you say there Yoda.

Did you also forget that these sanctions were to force Iraq to comply with the conditions of the CEASE FIRE that halted the Gulf War?

Remember, even your friends the frogs could have used their veto...

So Iraq oil is only good to anyone that the country can sell to. Is that a crime?

HUH? WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT YODA? OMFG I am so laughing my ass off AT you

Maybe you should read a little about how Goerge Washington felt about government (s) and how he adopted a very famous culture's first institution.

And maybe you should make a point every once in a while instead of throwing out these weird random lines that mean nothing and have no bearing or foundation in anything but the deepest darkest depths of your crack-induced delirium.

Just maybe.

You know something ???

Yeah, I know quite a few things...more than you can say.

I could speak facts all day to you and it would probably not sink into your amazingly thick cranium...

At least I have a cranium for any facts you might ever actually present to sink into. So far all I see from you Master Yoda is a bunch of crap that makes no argument for anything other than your complete inability to focus your brain on anything more complex than a black spot on a white wall.

Need proof?

So we arrive back at the question: who has the right to own destructive weapons?

You never said ANYTHING about "THE" question...

Seriously Dud, please tell your mom to put down the crack pipe...the second hand smoke seems to be getting to you.

I would also love to see what you have to say about the non-proliferation treaty that created the Korean DMZ...or any of that other crap that I have already made fun of you for in post #67.

Later Dud

NEXT

MAIN PC (for Soupkin)
=======
Asus A7N8X Deluxe
AMD Barton 2800
1024 Meg Corsair XMS PC3200 CAS2(2x512 in Dual Channel)
ATI Radeon 9700 Pro
Maxtor 40 Gig 7200 RPM ATA133
Maxtor 60 Gig 7200 RPM ATA133
350W Power Supply
Windows XP Home
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
2.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
6.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
 Re:
3.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
4.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
5.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
7.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
8.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
13.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
17.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
32.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
9.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
10.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
12.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
21.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
22.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
23.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
24.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
30.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
28.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
33.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
38.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
     WoMD
63.
Mar 13, 2003Mar 13 2003
      Re: WoMD
64.
Mar 13, 2003Mar 13 2003
       Re: WoMD
68.
Mar 13, 2003Mar 13 2003
       Re: WoMD
25.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
26.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
56.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
57.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
58.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
59.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
60.
Mar 13, 2003Mar 13 2003
61.
Mar 13, 2003Mar 13 2003
11.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
14.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
15.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
16.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
18.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
19.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
20.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
27.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
31.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
34.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
42.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
62.
Mar 13, 2003Mar 13 2003
    Re: to Craw
29.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
35.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
36.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
39.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
43.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
45.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
37.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
41.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
44.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
46.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
48.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
51.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
52.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
54.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
55.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
40.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
47.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
49.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
50.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
53.
Mar 12, 2003Mar 12 2003
65.
Mar 13, 2003Mar 13 2003
66.
Mar 13, 2003Mar 13 2003
67.
Mar 13, 2003Mar 13 2003
69.
Mar 13, 2003Mar 13 2003
70.
Mar 13, 2003Mar 13 2003
73.
Mar 13, 2003Mar 13 2003
74.
Mar 13, 2003Mar 13 2003
71.
Mar 13, 2003Mar 13 2003
72.
Mar 13, 2003Mar 13 2003
75.
Mar 14, 2003Mar 14 2003
76.
Mar 14, 2003Mar 14 2003
77.
Mar 14, 2003Mar 14 2003
78.
Mar 14, 2003Mar 14 2003
79.
Mar 14, 2003Mar 14 2003
 80.
Mar 14, 2003Mar 14 2003
 Re:
81.
Mar 15, 2003Mar 15 2003
  Re:
82.
Mar 15, 2003Mar 15 2003
   Re:
83.
Mar 15, 2003Mar 15 2003
    Re:
85.
Mar 15, 2003Mar 15 2003
     Re:
86.
Mar 15, 2003Mar 15 2003
91.
Mar 15, 2003Mar 15 2003
84.
Mar 15, 2003Mar 15 2003
    Re:
87.
Mar 15, 2003Mar 15 2003
88.
Mar 15, 2003Mar 15 2003
89.
Mar 15, 2003Mar 15 2003
90.
Mar 15, 2003Mar 15 2003
92.
Mar 15, 2003Mar 15 2003
93.
Mar 16, 2003Mar 16 2003
94.
Mar 16, 2003Mar 16 2003