3DMark 2003 [Feb 11, 2003, 2:50 pm ET] – Share – Viewing Comments
The Futuremark Downloads Page
now offers downloads of 3DMark2003, their new benchmark utility (thanks YiYas).
Mirrors of the 177 MB download can be found (thanks Quboid) on Majorgeeks,
Fileshack (registration required), Guru3d,
Vr-zone.com, Commongrounds-pc.com,
Computerbase.de/, Futuremark.allround-pc.com,
Vtr-hardware.com, Gamers-hardware.net,
Winfuture.de, Inpact-hardware.com,
Ocshoot.no, Edome.net,
Peliplaneetta.net, Pelaaja.info,
Dnainternet.fi, Tweak.dk,
Mydrivers.com, Nvidia.pl,
Dark-tweaker.com,
We-dare.nl, and Gamesbrasil.com.
"ATI Biased Feb 15, 13:18 Molestro
I scored a 2765 with my thunderbird 950mhz. 768mb sdram.
ATI RAdeon 9500 PRO 128mb <---- there's the reason.
Clearly I dont run games better then all the geforce 4 owners who have p4's. The only fair way to look at it seems to be if ATI owners compare with eachother, where the scores seem to range from 2500-5000, and Nvidia owners compare only with eachother where the scores range from 500-2000. 3d mark 03 definitly doesnt portray how well the cards do in todays games though, I have to agree with Nvidia on that one..."
it is from futuremark, if you think it is suposed to show how thigns compare in todays games you are totlay missing the point. of corse your current generation card does beter in comparison to technology that has been out for ages. as for the cpu comments, what do you think that whole push for harware tranfromation and lighting was about a few years back? to say any of that makes the benchmark ati biased is absurd.
This comment was edited on Feb 16, 13:43.
I scored a 2765 with my thunderbird 950mhz. 768mb sdram.
ATI RAdeon 9500 PRO 128mb <---- there's the reason.
Clearly I dont run games better then all the geforce 4 owners who have p4's. The only fair way to look at it seems to be if ATI owners compare with eachother, where the scores seem to range from 2500-5000, and Nvidia owners compare only with eachother where the scores range from 500-2000. 3d mark 03 definitly doesnt portray how well the cards do in todays games though, I have to agree with Nvidia on that one..."
it is from futuremark, if you think it is suposed to show how thigns compare in todays games you are totlay missing the point. of corse your current generation card does beter in comparison to technology that has been out for ages. as for the cpu comments, what do you think that whole push for harware tranfromation and lighting was about a few years back? to say any of that makes the benchmark ati biased is absurd.
This comment was edited on Feb 16, 13:43.
Date
Subject
Author
Copyright © 1996-2022 Stephen Heaslip. All rights reserved.
All trademarks are properties of their respective owners.
Privacy Policy. Manage Cookie Settings.
News CGI copyright © 1999-2022 James "furn" Furness & Blue's News. All rights reserved.
Chatbear v1.5.0/blue++: Page generated 14 August 2022, 13:58.