Black Hawk Down SP Demo

A single-player demo for Delta Force: Black Hawk Down has made its way onto the internet after being released on the cover-mount CD of a gaming magazine (thanks Tim Tibbetts). Apparently an updated demo that addresses some shortcomings in this one and adds the multiplayer component from the previously released demo of NovaLogic's upcoming DF game is in the works for a release in a few weeks, but in the meantime, no objections are being raised to the distribution of this demo, which can be found on 3D Gamers, FileShack (registration required), and Worthplaying.
View : : :
25.
 
Re: not superb
Jan 9, 2003, 18:43
25.
Re: not superb Jan 9, 2003, 18:43
Jan 9, 2003, 18:43
 
Sorry if i stepped on any toes there. ;-)
I just think it's not that bad as the most of you guys say it is. Novalogic is the only gamedeveloper that puts a fairly quality inside the ballistics of a firearm.
I played dozen of other tactical shooters.
for instance i shoot at a target 800 meters away. the moment i pull the trigger the target gets hit. we'll you know like me that a bullit has a travel period..
they even code that the bullit after a fair distance is dropping. No other game is coded like this..
I think they should get a little more credit than what is given now! that's all.

Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jan 8, 2003Jan 8 2003
2.
Jan 8, 2003Jan 8 2003
5.
Jan 8, 2003Jan 8 2003
3.
Jan 8, 2003Jan 8 2003
4.
Jan 8, 2003Jan 8 2003
6.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
7.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
11.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
12.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
8.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
9.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
10.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
13.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
14.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
15.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
16.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
17.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
18.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
19.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
20.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
21.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
22.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
23.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
    Re: superb
24.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
     Re: not superb
 25.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
      Re: not superb
33.
Jan 11, 2003Jan 11 2003
30.
Jan 10, 2003Jan 10 2003
     Re: superb
31.
Jan 10, 2003Jan 10 2003
      ouch
36.
Jan 12, 2003Jan 12 2003
26.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
27.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
28.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
29.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
32.
Jan 10, 2003Jan 10 2003
35.
Jan 12, 2003Jan 12 2003