Black Hawk Down SP Demo

A single-player demo for Delta Force: Black Hawk Down has made its way onto the internet after being released on the cover-mount CD of a gaming magazine (thanks Tim Tibbetts). Apparently an updated demo that addresses some shortcomings in this one and adds the multiplayer component from the previously released demo of NovaLogic's upcoming DF game is in the works for a release in a few weeks, but in the meantime, no objections are being raised to the distribution of this demo, which can be found on 3D Gamers, FileShack (registration required), and Worthplaying.
View : : :
22.
 
Re: superb
Jan 9, 2003, 13:53
22.
Re: superb Jan 9, 2003, 13:53
Jan 9, 2003, 13:53
 
@21: You can't stand "collective whining"? Has it occurred to you that those with complaints actually have legitimate issues with the demo? Or are you simply discounting their voiced concerns simply because you don't personally share them? People are entitled to be disappointed - if they look forward to a game and discover it's not what they hoped it would be, they have every right to express their opinion on such. If a majority don't like it, are they automatically wrong because one other person DOES like it?

Ultimately, a demo is supposed to be a reflection of the final product - a "preview" of what to expect. If the demo doesn't attract people's interest in buying the full product, what's the point of releasing one at all? If a demo is released and it's full of problems, it's only natural that people who discover such be wary of the final product as a result. Money may grow on trees for some to freely splash out on bug-filled or mediocre games, but most people don't enjoy that luxury. They want quality for their cash.

This comment was edited on Jan 9, 13:53.
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jan 8, 2003Jan 8 2003
2.
Jan 8, 2003Jan 8 2003
5.
Jan 8, 2003Jan 8 2003
3.
Jan 8, 2003Jan 8 2003
4.
Jan 8, 2003Jan 8 2003
6.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
7.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
11.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
12.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
8.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
9.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
10.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
13.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
14.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
15.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
16.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
17.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
18.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
19.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
20.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
21.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
 22.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
   Re: superb
23.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
    Re: superb
24.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
     Re: not superb
25.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
      Re: not superb
33.
Jan 11, 2003Jan 11 2003
30.
Jan 10, 2003Jan 10 2003
     Re: superb
31.
Jan 10, 2003Jan 10 2003
      ouch
36.
Jan 12, 2003Jan 12 2003
26.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
27.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
28.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
29.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
32.
Jan 10, 2003Jan 10 2003
35.
Jan 12, 2003Jan 12 2003