Black Hawk Down SP Demo

A single-player demo for Delta Force: Black Hawk Down has made its way onto the internet after being released on the cover-mount CD of a gaming magazine (thanks Tim Tibbetts). Apparently an updated demo that addresses some shortcomings in this one and adds the multiplayer component from the previously released demo of NovaLogic's upcoming DF game is in the works for a release in a few weeks, but in the meantime, no objections are being raised to the distribution of this demo, which can be found on 3D Gamers, FileShack (registration required), and Worthplaying.
View : : :
20.
 
Re: superb
Jan 9, 2003, 11:04
zaq
20.
Re: superb Jan 9, 2003, 11:04
Jan 9, 2003, 11:04
zaq
 
Sorry to burst your bubble joen51. But I've played tons of demos and tons of games for the last 10 years, and here is my conclusion.

9/10 times when they say this isn't the final look/feel of the the game because it's just a beta or a demo... it ends up being the same when it comes out. It's deadlines vs gameplay, and since deadlines are usually the priority of the "higher-ups"... that's what takes precedence.

You are fooling yourself if you tink Black Hawk will be any better when released.

And why shouldn't the public get mad if the GFX aren't state-of-the-art?

I'm still on a p3 700 and an old GF2 gts for that very reason. No games out now need much higher, and those that do at the moment are just bloated peices of garbage that aren't worth my time.

Keeping my fingers crossed for doom3.

Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jan 8, 2003Jan 8 2003
2.
Jan 8, 2003Jan 8 2003
5.
Jan 8, 2003Jan 8 2003
3.
Jan 8, 2003Jan 8 2003
4.
Jan 8, 2003Jan 8 2003
6.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
7.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
11.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
12.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
8.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
9.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
10.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
13.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
14.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
15.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
16.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
17.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
18.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
19.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
 20.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
 Re: superb
21.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
22.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
23.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
    Re: superb
24.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
     Re: not superb
25.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
      Re: not superb
33.
Jan 11, 2003Jan 11 2003
30.
Jan 10, 2003Jan 10 2003
     Re: superb
31.
Jan 10, 2003Jan 10 2003
      ouch
36.
Jan 12, 2003Jan 12 2003
26.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
27.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
28.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
29.
Jan 9, 2003Jan 9 2003
32.
Jan 10, 2003Jan 10 2003
35.
Jan 12, 2003Jan 12 2003