UT2003 Patch Plans

A post on Unreality offers details on the additions and changes planned for the upcoming Unreal Tournament 2003 patch, which is currently undergoing beta testing. The extensive list includes changes to gameplay, the HUD and menus, AI, networking, mod support, the engine, D3D/OpenGL, audio, and the oft-discussed demo feature.
View : : :
68.
 
Back on Topic for a moment...
Dec 10, 2002, 19:08
D2
68.
Back on Topic for a moment... Dec 10, 2002, 19:08
Dec 10, 2002, 19:08
D2
 
I personally am getting a bit anoyed with Epic anouncing patches and bonus packs that are no way near ready to be realeased. We 1st heard mention of this patch about 2 weeks after the release of the 1st patch. And the bonus pack weeks and weeks ago.
I get get sick of waiting for stuff like this and lose interest. I love UT2k3, if its not everyones taste then whatever. Dont play it. You can still play UT you know. Its still out there, and yes, there are still ALOT more people playing UT online than there are Playing 2k3. Go and do that rather than b1tch about 2k3.
BUT the realease was buggy and I know sometimes that has to go with the territory. If they are gonna release something buggy then they have to be prepared to release TIMELY fixes for the bugs. I for one cant use the redeemer because I STILL (even after the 1st patch that was supposed to fix it) have the view skew to one side and everything get messed up till I die. Surely they could have released a few hotfixes in the meantime while they betatest the patch. Yes, I want added content, but its more important to me that the game that was shipped actually works properly 1st. Priorities guys. And keep your traps shut untill maybe a week or so before you are ready to release something. People will play your game because its a good game, they arent gonna stoop just because you p1ssed them off, but still, is it anyway to treat your customers?

Date
Subject
Author
1.
Dec 5, 2002Dec 5 2002
2.
Dec 5, 2002Dec 5 2002
3.
Dec 5, 2002Dec 5 2002
5.
Dec 5, 2002Dec 5 2002
6.
Dec 5, 2002Dec 5 2002
7.
Dec 5, 2002Dec 5 2002
     Re: No subject
8.
Dec 5, 2002Dec 5 2002
      Re: No subject
9.
Dec 5, 2002Dec 5 2002
       Re: No subject
10.
Dec 5, 2002Dec 5 2002
        Re: No subject
11.
Dec 5, 2002Dec 5 2002
         Re: No subject
12.
Dec 5, 2002Dec 5 2002
          Re: No subject
13.
Dec 5, 2002Dec 5 2002
          Re: No subject
14.
Dec 5, 2002Dec 5 2002
           Re: No subject
15.
Dec 5, 2002Dec 5 2002
            Re: No subject
52.
Dec 9, 2002Dec 9 2002
          Re: No subject
53.
Dec 9, 2002Dec 9 2002
           Re: No subject
16.
Dec 5, 2002Dec 5 2002
        Re: No subject
17.
Dec 5, 2002Dec 5 2002
         Re: No subject
18.
Dec 5, 2002Dec 5 2002
          Re: No subject
19.
Dec 5, 2002Dec 5 2002
          Re: No subject
20.
Dec 5, 2002Dec 5 2002
           Re: No subject
36.
Dec 6, 2002Dec 6 2002
4.
Dec 5, 2002Dec 5 2002
21.
Dec 5, 2002Dec 5 2002
22.
Dec 5, 2002Dec 5 2002
28.
Dec 5, 2002Dec 5 2002
29.
Dec 5, 2002Dec 5 2002
30.
Dec 6, 2002Dec 6 2002
23.
Dec 5, 2002Dec 5 2002
24.
Dec 5, 2002Dec 5 2002
25.
Dec 5, 2002Dec 5 2002
26.
Dec 5, 2002Dec 5 2002
27.
Dec 5, 2002Dec 5 2002
31.
Dec 6, 2002Dec 6 2002
32.
Dec 6, 2002Dec 6 2002
33.
Dec 6, 2002Dec 6 2002
34.
Dec 6, 2002Dec 6 2002
35.
Dec 6, 2002Dec 6 2002
48.
Dec 6, 2002Dec 6 2002
37.
Dec 6, 2002Dec 6 2002
38.
Dec 6, 2002Dec 6 2002
39.
Dec 6, 2002Dec 6 2002
40.
Dec 6, 2002Dec 6 2002
41.
Dec 6, 2002Dec 6 2002
42.
Dec 6, 2002Dec 6 2002
     Re: No subject
43.
Dec 6, 2002Dec 6 2002
      Re: No subject
45.
Dec 6, 2002Dec 6 2002
       Re: Xeon
46.
Dec 6, 2002Dec 6 2002
        Re: Xeon
47.
Dec 6, 2002Dec 6 2002
         Re: Xeon
49.
Dec 6, 2002Dec 6 2002
          No subject
50.
Dec 6, 2002Dec 6 2002
           Re: No subject
51.
Dec 6, 2002Dec 6 2002
            Re: No subject
44.
Dec 6, 2002Dec 6 2002
      Re: No subject
54.
Dec 9, 2002Dec 9 2002
55.
Dec 9, 2002Dec 9 2002
56.
Dec 9, 2002Dec 9 2002
57.
Dec 10, 2002Dec 10 2002
58.
Dec 10, 2002Dec 10 2002
59.
Dec 10, 2002Dec 10 2002
   #57
60.
Dec 10, 2002Dec 10 2002
    Re: #59
71.
Dec 11, 2002Dec 11 2002
    Re: #57
61.
Dec 10, 2002Dec 10 2002
62.
Dec 10, 2002Dec 10 2002
63.
Dec 10, 2002Dec 10 2002
64.
Dec 10, 2002Dec 10 2002
65.
Dec 10, 2002Dec 10 2002
67.
Dec 10, 2002Dec 10 2002
       Re: UT2003 is CRAP!
66.
Dec 10, 2002Dec 10 2002
69.
Dec 10, 2002Dec 10 2002
 68.
Dec 10, 2002Dec 10 2002
Back on Topic for a moment...
70.
Dec 11, 2002Dec 11 2002