Reply from Reno's Post
Who am I calling names? I just said there are a lot of jack asses and idiots out there, and it seems to me that most of them happen to be one sided loud mouthed closed minded people, or in other words, the majority of the UT2003 haters. You seem to be trying to bed a personal attack on me. Your right, nobody has to give UT2003 a chance... especially if you’re a close minded jackass idiot! :-P It's ok if you are though! Your right, nobody owes epic, the creator of the best 1st person shooters ever (my opinion), the company that has almost single handedly thrown the 3d gaming world into the future, the company that has given more product support and generated more community interaction to it's games than any other game I've ever seen, nobody owes them a thing. They did it all for a mere forty bucks to buy the game. That's as far as your commitment goes. If you want to bitch and whine it’s YOUR FREAKING RIGHT to do so, although be careful, you might look like a jackass!
You said you don't like UT2003 because it "doesn't feel right"... ok, I wont argue with that, it's pretty general, but valid.
I also agree map design is poor, not "very poor" but could have been better.
No demo recording on release is one of your top reasons for not liking the game? Wow, you must really have gotten it on with demo recording. I think I did six demos in four years with UT... all clan matches. That's it. Nice feature, but not exactly the main bowel of cheese for my whine in considering a game.
What leading edge graphically superior game do you know of that can run on a Pentium II 300MHz without the expense of game play? LOL, that reason is just lame. Of course there will be an expense of game play in favor of the best graphics! That's why they threw in the little tab in your menus that you can turn off or down the super high res graphics. They are designing a game for leading edge technology! Hello McFly! Not like Blizzards goof up by releasing DII in low res sprite graphics. Great game, but the tables were reversed and everyone wanted graphics, despite the great game play. Bitch bitch bitch bitch!!! Whaaaaaaaa! I have an AMD XP 1800+ gig on a Geforce Ti4600 and run the game flawlessly (45-95fps) in all the highest settings everything ON at 1024X768, and my system is only middle of the line. Sounds like you need an upgrade mister!
Oh yes, and your opinion really hurt my feelings... Dude are you like 12 or something?
Like a stated in my original post, I expected UT2003 to be a 10, found it was a 6, then found it to be more like an 8 after really giving it a fair chance. You can feel differently, I don't care it's just my opinion, and you probably suck :-P If you don't like something, be productive and give constructive critisisim or something like they teach you on Sesame Street. Don't just turn every forum you visit into a rant and whine page. One thing I've really noticed... everyone I've ever played UT2003 online with that whined about the game... really sucked ASS! I mean the more you killed them, the whinier they got. Not everyone that sucked whined. And not everyone that thinks the game blows whined, but yes, everyone that whined sucked. See the correlation?
I didn’t force myself to like the game, so I’m not pathetic (You name caller! Whaaaa! Mommy, he hurt my feelings!!) I did force myself to give the game the chance it needs to be realized to it’s potential. Just recently a UT2003 hating clan member of mine finally came around and said “Gee, this game isn’t so bad after all! Now that I know WTF I’m doing!” He still plays UT but plays UT2003 more and more and actually likes it!
Oh yea, and this is all just my opinion, I could be wrong. We’ll see for sure this time next year.
This comment was edited on Dec 11, 05:12.