Slow down there, meatpole. You have no knowledge of how much cache the processor will have - it could easily have twice as much.
Also, since they're releasing a 64 bit fix, you could bet the code is optimized for 8-byte pointers.
One more thing - they tout backward compatibility, so I would bet 4-byte pointers still work just fine. My guess is that the chip can just ignore the upper half of its adress space (or applications can, at least).