WWII Online Patch

The WWII Online Downloads Page now offers the version 1.7 patch for the massively multiplayer game of World War II combat. This post to the WWII Online Forums by producer Chris "Mo" Sherland features details on what's new and different in the new version, which includes hardware T&L support as well as gameplay tweaks, additions, and fixes.
View : : :
129.
 
Re: Hahahaha
Nov 13, 2002, 19:39
Re: Hahahaha Nov 13, 2002, 19:39
Nov 13, 2002, 19:39
 
>It's incredible that you don't understand that.

I understand it, but some unsuspecting readers on this board might not. I clarified it primarily for their benefit.

>And you can fill up that limit pretty damn quick if you're
>assaulting an AB (that means Army Base). Since all the
>enemy spawns out of two points in that small area, in a
>popular town it's *damn easy* to hit the "64 visible
>player entities at any one time in the forward looking
>viewport area of space location" limit. (was that enough
>words to describe it this time? or do you need more?)

That's enough words to tell me you're probably wrong. You've actually seen *64 enemy soldiers all looking at you at the same time*? I doubt it.

It is very easy to have more than 64 in the general area, but it's very very hard to have more than 64 all drawn in such a way that there's a 65th in front of you, firing at you, that you can't see.

>Especially since YOUR OWN TROOPS count toward that limit.
>Oops. Probably didn't want any mention of that coming out,
>did you? Well, it's true. Your own side counts against
>that same '64 limit' (being the limit mentioned above -
>hopefully I don't have to describe it fully once again).

Yes, but the preference is to draw the people right in front of you first, and then enemies, etc. So unless you have, say, 64 of your buddies all line up single-file in front of you, you're still going to see that German in front of you firing at you. (That example might not be exactly right, as the algorithm for drawing preference is complicated.)

>So in truth, you don't *have* to have 64 ENEMIES firing at
>you to get killed by an unseen unit, you merely have to
>have 64 PEOPLE, friendly or not, in your general area.

No. In truth, you pretty much HAVE to have 64 ENEMIES firing at you to get killed by an undrawn unit. Because any other friendlies around won't get drawn if there's an enemy looking at you, unless they are right in front of you.

Bruce


Date
Subject
Author
1.
Nov 7, 2002Nov 7 2002
2.
Nov 7, 2002Nov 7 2002
3.
Nov 7, 2002Nov 7 2002
8.
Nov 7, 2002Nov 7 2002
22.
Nov 8, 2002Nov 8 2002
23.
Nov 8, 2002Nov 8 2002
6.
Nov 7, 2002Nov 7 2002
9.
Nov 7, 2002Nov 7 2002
11.
Nov 7, 2002Nov 7 2002
12.
Nov 7, 2002Nov 7 2002
13.
Nov 7, 2002Nov 7 2002
     Re: unlike the
14.
Nov 7, 2002Nov 7 2002
      Re: unlike the
15.
Nov 7, 2002Nov 7 2002
       Re: unlike the
17.
Nov 7, 2002Nov 7 2002
        I'll agree with you guys
29.
Nov 8, 2002Nov 8 2002
        Re: unlike the
30.
Nov 8, 2002Nov 8 2002
         Re: unlike the
31.
Nov 8, 2002Nov 8 2002
         Re: unlike the
32.
Nov 8, 2002Nov 8 2002
         Re: unlike the
33.
Nov 8, 2002Nov 8 2002
          Re: unlike the
34.
Nov 8, 2002Nov 8 2002
           Re: unlike the
37.
Nov 8, 2002Nov 8 2002
           Don't listen to Blair
38.
Nov 8, 2002Nov 8 2002
            Re: Don't listen to Blair
39.
Nov 8, 2002Nov 8 2002
             Re: Don't listen to Blair
40.
Nov 8, 2002Nov 8 2002
              Hehe, CRS stooping to a new low
42.
Nov 8, 2002Nov 8 2002
               Re: Hehe, CRS stooping to a new low
43.
Nov 8, 2002Nov 8 2002
                Re: Hehe, CRS stooping to a new low
44.
Nov 8, 2002Nov 8 2002
                 Re: Hehe, CRS stooping to a new low
45.
Nov 8, 2002Nov 8 2002
                  Re: Hehe, CRS stooping to a new low
48.
Nov 8, 2002Nov 8 2002
                   Re: Hehe, CRS stooping to a new low
49.
Nov 8, 2002Nov 8 2002
                    Re: Hehe, CRS stooping to a new low
50.
Nov 8, 2002Nov 8 2002
                     Re: Hehe, CRS stooping to a new low
51.
Nov 8, 2002Nov 8 2002
                      A Man Obsessed
52.
Nov 8, 2002Nov 8 2002
                       Re: A Man Obsessed
53.
Nov 9, 2002Nov 9 2002
                        Last word, I swear...
57.
Nov 9, 2002Nov 9 2002
                         Re: Last word, I swear...
58.
Nov 9, 2002Nov 9 2002
                          Re: Last word, I swear...
60.
Nov 9, 2002Nov 9 2002
                           Re: Last word, I swear...
59.
Nov 9, 2002Nov 9 2002
                          Re: Last word, I swear...
61.
Nov 9, 2002Nov 9 2002
                           Re: Last word, I swear...
62.
Nov 9, 2002Nov 9 2002
                            Re: Last word, I swear...
46.
Nov 8, 2002Nov 8 2002
             Re: Don't listen to Blair
47.
Nov 8, 2002Nov 8 2002
              Re: Don't listen to Blair
41.
Nov 8, 2002Nov 8 2002
            Re: Don't listen to Blair - et all
10.
Nov 7, 2002Nov 7 2002
5.
Nov 7, 2002Nov 7 2002
7.
Nov 7, 2002Nov 7 2002
16.
Nov 7, 2002Nov 7 2002
18.
Nov 7, 2002Nov 7 2002
19.
Nov 7, 2002Nov 7 2002
24.
Nov 8, 2002Nov 8 2002
25.
Nov 8, 2002Nov 8 2002
35.
Nov 8, 2002Nov 8 2002
   Wasrad
36.
Nov 8, 2002Nov 8 2002
20.
Nov 7, 2002Nov 7 2002
21.
Nov 8, 2002Nov 8 2002
26.
Nov 8, 2002Nov 8 2002
27.
Nov 8, 2002Nov 8 2002
28.
Nov 8, 2002Nov 8 2002
54.
Nov 9, 2002Nov 9 2002
55.
Nov 9, 2002Nov 9 2002
56.
Nov 9, 2002Nov 9 2002
63.
Nov 9, 2002Nov 9 2002
64.
Nov 9, 2002Nov 9 2002
65.
Nov 9, 2002Nov 9 2002
66.
Nov 9, 2002Nov 9 2002
67.
Nov 9, 2002Nov 9 2002
68.
Nov 10, 2002Nov 10 2002
70.
Nov 10, 2002Nov 10 2002
71.
Nov 10, 2002Nov 10 2002
72.
Nov 10, 2002Nov 10 2002
73.
Nov 10, 2002Nov 10 2002
75.
Nov 10, 2002Nov 10 2002
76.
Nov 10, 2002Nov 10 2002
77.
Nov 10, 2002Nov 10 2002
78.
Nov 10, 2002Nov 10 2002
79.
Nov 10, 2002Nov 10 2002
80.
Nov 10, 2002Nov 10 2002
           ww2ol
83.
Nov 10, 2002Nov 10 2002
84.
Nov 10, 2002Nov 10 2002
82.
Nov 10, 2002Nov 10 2002
85.
Nov 10, 2002Nov 10 2002
86.
Nov 10, 2002Nov 10 2002
91.
Nov 11, 2002Nov 11 2002
94.
Nov 11, 2002Nov 11 2002
95.
Nov 11, 2002Nov 11 2002
96.
Nov 11, 2002Nov 11 2002
98.
Nov 11, 2002Nov 11 2002
97.
Nov 11, 2002Nov 11 2002
99.
Nov 11, 2002Nov 11 2002
105.
Nov 11, 2002Nov 11 2002
81.
Nov 10, 2002Nov 10 2002
74.
Nov 10, 2002Nov 10 2002
87.
Nov 11, 2002Nov 11 2002
88.
Nov 11, 2002Nov 11 2002
90.
Nov 11, 2002Nov 11 2002
93.
Nov 11, 2002Nov 11 2002
92.
Nov 11, 2002Nov 11 2002
100.
Nov 11, 2002Nov 11 2002
101.
Nov 11, 2002Nov 11 2002
106.
Nov 11, 2002Nov 11 2002
110.
Nov 11, 2002Nov 11 2002
128.
Nov 13, 2002Nov 13 2002
102.
Nov 11, 2002Nov 11 2002
103.
Nov 11, 2002Nov 11 2002
104.
Nov 11, 2002Nov 11 2002
107.
Nov 11, 2002Nov 11 2002
108.
Nov 11, 2002Nov 11 2002
109.
Nov 11, 2002Nov 11 2002
111.
Nov 12, 2002Nov 12 2002
112.
Nov 12, 2002Nov 12 2002
113.
Nov 12, 2002Nov 12 2002
115.
Nov 12, 2002Nov 12 2002
114.
Nov 12, 2002Nov 12 2002
 129.
Nov 13, 2002Nov 13 2002
 Re: Hahahaha
116.
Nov 12, 2002Nov 12 2002
117.
Nov 12, 2002Nov 12 2002
118.
Nov 12, 2002Nov 12 2002
130.
Nov 13, 2002Nov 13 2002
141.
Nov 14, 2002Nov 14 2002
142.
Nov 14, 2002Nov 14 2002
152.
Nov 15, 2002Nov 15 2002
119.
Nov 12, 2002Nov 12 2002
121.
Nov 12, 2002Nov 12 2002
120.
Nov 12, 2002Nov 12 2002
125.
Nov 13, 2002Nov 13 2002
127.
Nov 13, 2002Nov 13 2002
132.
Nov 13, 2002Nov 13 2002
149.
Nov 15, 2002Nov 15 2002
123.
Nov 13, 2002Nov 13 2002
124.
Nov 13, 2002Nov 13 2002
131.
Nov 13, 2002Nov 13 2002
133.
Nov 13, 2002Nov 13 2002
134.
Nov 13, 2002Nov 13 2002
135.
Nov 13, 2002Nov 13 2002
150.
Nov 15, 2002Nov 15 2002
151.
Nov 15, 2002Nov 15 2002
137.
Nov 14, 2002Nov 14 2002
138.
Nov 14, 2002Nov 14 2002
139.
Nov 14, 2002Nov 14 2002
140.
Nov 14, 2002Nov 14 2002
143.
Nov 14, 2002Nov 14 2002
153.
Nov 15, 2002Nov 15 2002
144.
Nov 14, 2002Nov 14 2002
148.
Nov 14, 2002Nov 14 2002
154.
Nov 15, 2002Nov 15 2002
156.
Nov 16, 2002Nov 16 2002
157.
Nov 16, 2002Nov 16 2002
158.
Nov 18, 2002Nov 18 2002
    Re: Typical
159.
Nov 18, 2002Nov 18 2002
     Re: Typical
160.
Nov 19, 2002Nov 19 2002
      Re: Typical
161.
Nov 19, 2002Nov 19 2002
       Re: Typical
162.
Nov 25, 2002Nov 25 2002
        Re: Typical
145.
Nov 14, 2002Nov 14 2002
146.
Nov 14, 2002Nov 14 2002
147.
Nov 14, 2002Nov 14 2002
155.
Nov 15, 2002Nov 15 2002