The deal here is that network telivision is regulated by the government (FCC) because the government regulates the airwaves (this goes for radio as well) and not private business. This means that they censor language

My question (since this seems to have sparked a whole load of anti-regulation opinions) is "Should the media be regulate at all?". My answer to this would be a resounding yes. I don't want (for instance) hard-core porn on free to air daytime TV where kids can see it. (Actually I don't want porn on free to air TV at all but hey).

It seems to me that if we say Yes to my question then we have a more sensible discussion about what should and shouldn't be censored. At this point the arguments about shows such as "Puppetry of the Penis" becomes a better exchange of opinion. (Personallly I buy the "its only teenage kids humour so what the hell let programs with an audience of immature kids watch it" argument). 'There should be no censorship at all' is an equally valid argument (though completely unrealistic and mad IMO).

Actually there is a supplemental question, which is "Does the govt fund Network TV in the US?" in which case - just as with the Pay stations - surely those who fund the shows (taxpayers) should determine content, presumably thru a representative body of some description (either by apointment or election).



Anvil