Not in the least. Are your comprehension skills so poor, that you can't discern the difference between what he originally posted, and my response?
LOL! Let's find out, shall we? It's really a simple matter to scroll down, copy and paste, and analyze. Please, tell me if my summaries are lacking in comprehension. The original post will be quoted (indented and italicized) and my summaries will be in normal text.
This isn't related to today's OotB, but does anyone else think this week's logo is in poor taste? I don't know about the rest of you, but living in Northern Virginia, where there's been 6 random sniper-style killings in the area in the past 4 days, I'm sickened by the image here of someone being held with a gun to their head regardless of him being a terrorist, as the image seems to depict.
I don't like this week's logo. It's not only in poor taste because of what's been happening in near me in Virginia, but also because it's very disturbing to see a person with a gun being held to his head.
[Observation: No attempt at censorship or any attempt to "force an opinion on you".]
I'm not an advocate of blaming violence on computer games, but there's something really creepy about using such an image as a logo with the recent shootings. I understand the correlation to the new Clancy game, but it hits just a little too close to home considering there are probably many, many people like me who are too scared to go shopping for fear of suddenly getting shot in the back... Any chance we could change the logo to something a little less troubling?
I don't think that video games cause violence, and understand that it's related to the new Tom Clancy game, but it's really disturbing for people who are being affected by local violence. Is it possible that Blue can change the logo?
[Observation: Again, no attempt to force an opinion and only a plea to encourage Blue to change the logo. If you think asking to change a logo (not even demanding, but simply asking "Any chance we could change the logo...?") is somehow trying to force censorship, then I certainly hold to my original post to say that you are so weak minded that you cannot discern between someone starting a discussion and someone trying to forcibly change your thoughts. If you don't have the conviction to stand by your ideals without a simple question
changing your beliefs, then perhaps you are the one who has the problem.]
I don't want to bother everyone else by taking his post side-by-side with your post, but your post obviously conveyed the thought that you felt Morgan19 was trying to force his morals upon you and censor the logo. Maybe my comprehension does need work, and my summaries above are incorrect. Please, correct me if I'm wrong, but... well, I'm not.
Fixed a misplaced "only".This comment was edited on Oct 7, 18:47.