Blizzard's Next Announcement

Blizzard Entertainment sends word that their next product announcement will take place Friday, September 20 during this year's Tokyo Game Show. There are no further details about the planned announcement other that it will involve back-to-back press conferences, but this should provide fuel for some interesting speculation, since the TGS is primarily focused on console games, though Blizzard has shown off PC offerings at the show in the past.
View : : :
52.
 
Re: expect more
Sep 13, 2002, 16:46
52.
Re: expect more Sep 13, 2002, 16:46
Sep 13, 2002, 16:46
 
A rant on Dungeon Siege:

Diablo II was a much better game for many reasons, which I will explain below.

1) non-linear world. Diablo II questing didn't feel like you were following one road. While you had a goal that you were striving towards, you weren't forced to walk one windy path with a few "extra places to go." Maybe I was expecting too much from DS, but I expected a larger world with more variety in the terrain and more ways to go. DS was just too linear.

2) Diablo II has very intruiging and interesting character classes. They all provide different ways to play, be it hack and slash or caster, or the more strategic route via the Necro or Druid. DS had a neat skill-based system, but it didn't allow enough diversity. It was too unorganized.

3) Diablo II was more immersive. Even with its 2D engine, I felt more apart of the game than I ever did in DS.

4) Dungeon Siege was too easy on easy and too hard on hard. It was too difficult to find the right balance. Diablo II had a good balance of easy and difficult areas, so you could feel like a badass but be challenged at the same time.

I personally think the best game would be a combination of Neverwinter Nights and Dungeon Siege. Neverwinter had all the good RPG elements that Diabloe lacked, but it played too slow. NWN was a blast, but a lot of the times I found myself craving the cool auras that my had Assassin in Diablo.

What I meant by 3D Action RPG was not a top down game. I'm talking 3rd person view like Jedi Knight II. With those controls (add a few moves), cool spells and special abilities that you could gain with levels AND cool multiplayer support (co-op and team-based war or something), you'd have a great game. that's what I meant by 3D Diablo game =)

Date
Subject
Author
1.
Sep 9, 2002Sep 9 2002
2.
Sep 9, 2002Sep 9 2002
4.
Sep 9, 2002Sep 9 2002
9.
Sep 9, 2002Sep 9 2002
49.
Sep 13, 2002Sep 13 2002
50.
Sep 13, 2002Sep 13 2002
53.
Sep 13, 2002Sep 13 2002
54.
Sep 13, 2002Sep 13 2002
      Re: dig warcraft 3
56.
Sep 14, 2002Sep 14 2002
       Re: dig warcraft 3
57.
Sep 14, 2002Sep 14 2002
        Re: dig warcraft 3
58.
Sep 14, 2002Sep 14 2002
        Re: dig warcraft 3
59.
Sep 15, 2002Sep 15 2002
         Re: dig warcraft 3
61.
Sep 15, 2002Sep 15 2002
          Re: dig warcraft 3
62.
Sep 15, 2002Sep 15 2002
      Re: dig warcraft 3
63.
Sep 16, 2002Sep 16 2002
       Re: dig warcraft 3
64.
Sep 16, 2002Sep 16 2002
        Re: dig warcraft 3
65.
Sep 16, 2002Sep 16 2002
         Re: dig warcraft 3
66.
Sep 16, 2002Sep 16 2002
          Re: dig warcraft 3
67.
Sep 16, 2002Sep 16 2002
        Re: dig warcraft 3
68.
Sep 16, 2002Sep 16 2002
        Re: dig warcraft 3
69.
Sep 16, 2002Sep 16 2002
         Re: dig warcraft 3
70.
Sep 16, 2002Sep 16 2002
          Re: dig warcraft 3
72.
Sep 16, 2002Sep 16 2002
           Re: dig warcraft 3
74.
Sep 16, 2002Sep 16 2002
           Re: dig warcraft 3
75.
Sep 16, 2002Sep 16 2002
            Re: dig warcraft 3
76.
Sep 16, 2002Sep 16 2002
             Re: dig warcraft 3
77.
Sep 17, 2002Sep 17 2002
             Re: dig warcraft 3
78.
Sep 17, 2002Sep 17 2002
              Re: dig warcraft 3
79.
Sep 17, 2002Sep 17 2002
               Re: dig warcraft 3
80.
Sep 17, 2002Sep 17 2002
               Re: dig warcraft 3
81.
Sep 19, 2002Sep 19 2002
                Re: dig warcraft 3
3.
Sep 9, 2002Sep 9 2002
5.
Sep 9, 2002Sep 9 2002
6.
Sep 9, 2002Sep 9 2002
8.
Sep 9, 2002Sep 9 2002
   Re: ...
7.
Sep 9, 2002Sep 9 2002
10.
Sep 9, 2002Sep 9 2002
12.
Sep 9, 2002Sep 9 2002
14.
Sep 9, 2002Sep 9 2002
32.
Sep 10, 2002Sep 10 2002
11.
Sep 9, 2002Sep 9 2002
13.
Sep 9, 2002Sep 9 2002
31.
Sep 10, 2002Sep 10 2002
15.
Sep 9, 2002Sep 9 2002
16.
Sep 9, 2002Sep 9 2002
18.
Sep 9, 2002Sep 9 2002
17.
Sep 9, 2002Sep 9 2002
19.
Sep 9, 2002Sep 9 2002
20.
Sep 9, 2002Sep 9 2002
21.
Sep 9, 2002Sep 9 2002
22.
Sep 9, 2002Sep 9 2002
33.
Sep 10, 2002Sep 10 2002
34.
Sep 10, 2002Sep 10 2002
35.
Sep 10, 2002Sep 10 2002
23.
Sep 9, 2002Sep 9 2002
24.
Sep 9, 2002Sep 9 2002
25.
Sep 9, 2002Sep 9 2002
26.
Sep 10, 2002Sep 10 2002
27.
Sep 10, 2002Sep 10 2002
28.
Sep 10, 2002Sep 10 2002
29.
Sep 10, 2002Sep 10 2002
30.
Sep 10, 2002Sep 10 2002
36.
Sep 10, 2002Sep 10 2002
37.
Sep 11, 2002Sep 11 2002
38.
Sep 11, 2002Sep 11 2002
39.
Sep 11, 2002Sep 11 2002
40.
Sep 11, 2002Sep 11 2002
41.
Sep 11, 2002Sep 11 2002
42.
Sep 11, 2002Sep 11 2002
44.
Sep 11, 2002Sep 11 2002
45.
Sep 11, 2002Sep 11 2002
43.
Sep 11, 2002Sep 11 2002
46.
Sep 12, 2002Sep 12 2002
47.
Sep 12, 2002Sep 12 2002
48.
Sep 12, 2002Sep 12 2002
51.
Sep 13, 2002Sep 13 2002
 52.
Sep 13, 2002Sep 13 2002
 Re: expect more
71.
Sep 16, 2002Sep 16 2002
73.
Sep 16, 2002Sep 16 2002
  SC2
60.
Sep 15, 2002Sep 15 2002
82.
Sep 19, 2002Sep 19 2002