UT2003 Demo Update

A post to the Infogrames Forums (thanks Alex Judge and Unreality) by Epic's CliffyB offers an update on the UT2003 demo, which he promises will be "not much longer" (not that we haven't heard that before, so an accompanying grain of salt is recommended). According to the update, the reworked menus are being ironed out, the server browser is almost finished, and they are focusing on testing the maps that are shipping with the demo. He goes on to outline some details about the four maps to be included, and concludes by adding: "One thing that I'm excited about with the new UT - all of the gametypes will be very fun and viable online. Assault and the original Domination, as much as I love them, had some issues that prevented them from reaching their full potential online. Dom 2.0 and Bombing Run are right up there with CTF and other gametypes!" Attempting to stave off the inevitable effort folks put into misinterpreting such things while hedging on the definition of 'not much longer,' a follow-up post from Cliff reminds us: "I did NOT promise a date. We could be more than 2 weeks away still."
View : : :
3.
 
Re: I am busy in 2 weeks
Sep 4, 2002, 09:14
3.
Re: I am busy in 2 weeks Sep 4, 2002, 09:14
Sep 4, 2002, 09:14
 
Yes! Release it now so we may have hundreds of people complain about bugs and blame the company for releasing a buggy product! NOW IS THE TIME!!

Date
Subject
Author
1.
Sep 4, 2002Sep 4 2002
2.
Sep 4, 2002Sep 4 2002
 3.
Sep 4, 2002Sep 4 2002
 Re: I am busy in 2 weeks
4.
Sep 4, 2002Sep 4 2002
5.
Sep 4, 2002Sep 4 2002
19.
Sep 4, 2002Sep 4 2002
6.
Sep 4, 2002Sep 4 2002
7.
Sep 4, 2002Sep 4 2002
8.
Sep 4, 2002Sep 4 2002
9.
Sep 4, 2002Sep 4 2002
10.
Sep 4, 2002Sep 4 2002
11.
Sep 4, 2002Sep 4 2002
12.
Sep 4, 2002Sep 4 2002
    Re: <YAWN>
18.
Sep 4, 2002Sep 4 2002
     Re: <YAWN>
32.
Sep 4, 2002Sep 4 2002
      Re: <YAWN>
34.
Sep 4, 2002Sep 4 2002
       Re: <YAWN>
16.
Sep 4, 2002Sep 4 2002
    Re: <YAWN>
23.
Sep 4, 2002Sep 4 2002
     Re: <YAWN>
13.
Sep 4, 2002Sep 4 2002
69.
Sep 8, 2002Sep 8 2002
14.
Sep 4, 2002Sep 4 2002
15.
Sep 4, 2002Sep 4 2002
17.
Sep 4, 2002Sep 4 2002
20.
Sep 4, 2002Sep 4 2002
22.
Sep 4, 2002Sep 4 2002
26.
Sep 4, 2002Sep 4 2002
28.
Sep 4, 2002Sep 4 2002
29.
Sep 4, 2002Sep 4 2002
    Re: Well...
30.
Sep 4, 2002Sep 4 2002
     UT2K3
31.
Sep 4, 2002Sep 4 2002
      Re: UT2K3
33.
Sep 4, 2002Sep 4 2002
       Quoteage
36.
Sep 4, 2002Sep 4 2002
        Re: Quoteage
38.
Sep 4, 2002Sep 4 2002
         #36
39.
Sep 4, 2002Sep 4 2002
         Re: Mozilla?
35.
Sep 4, 2002Sep 4 2002
       Re: UT2K3
37.
Sep 4, 2002Sep 4 2002
        Re: UT2K3
40.
Sep 4, 2002Sep 4 2002
         Re: UT2K3
41.
Sep 4, 2002Sep 4 2002
          Re: UT2K3
61.
Sep 5, 2002Sep 5 2002
62.
Sep 6, 2002Sep 6 2002
63.
Sep 6, 2002Sep 6 2002
65.
Sep 6, 2002Sep 6 2002
66.
Sep 7, 2002Sep 7 2002
67.
Sep 7, 2002Sep 7 2002
68.
Sep 8, 2002Sep 8 2002
47.
Sep 4, 2002Sep 4 2002
48.
Sep 4, 2002Sep 4 2002
21.
Sep 4, 2002Sep 4 2002
24.
Sep 4, 2002Sep 4 2002
25.
Sep 4, 2002Sep 4 2002
27.
Sep 4, 2002Sep 4 2002
42.
Sep 4, 2002Sep 4 2002
43.
Sep 4, 2002Sep 4 2002
45.
Sep 4, 2002Sep 4 2002
49.
Sep 4, 2002Sep 4 2002
46.
Sep 4, 2002Sep 4 2002
44.
Sep 4, 2002Sep 4 2002
50.
Sep 4, 2002Sep 4 2002
51.
Sep 4, 2002Sep 4 2002
52.
Sep 4, 2002Sep 4 2002
53.
Sep 5, 2002Sep 5 2002
54.
Sep 5, 2002Sep 5 2002
55.
Sep 5, 2002Sep 5 2002
56.
Sep 5, 2002Sep 5 2002
57.
Sep 5, 2002Sep 5 2002
58.
Sep 5, 2002Sep 5 2002
59.
Sep 5, 2002Sep 5 2002
60.
Sep 5, 2002Sep 5 2002
64.
Sep 6, 2002Sep 6 2002
70.
Sep 9, 2002Sep 9 2002
71.
Sep 10, 2002Sep 10 2002
72.
Sep 10, 2002Sep 10 2002
73.
Sep 10, 2002Sep 10 2002