Ships Ahoy: WarCraft III

Warcraft III: Reign of Chaos Now Available is the press release announcing the availability of the eagerly anticipated new installment in the Warcraft series of RTS games. Here is a bit on what the release describes as what is new in this new installment:
A focus on concentrated battles between groups of mighty warriors brings an exciting new blend of action to the franchise. In the single-player game, players follow the adventures of Legendary Heroes, who grow more formidable with experience. As the game progresses, these Heroes are able to learn spells and special abilities and acquire powerful magic items. Heroes advance even faster in multiplayer games, adding to the intensity of strategic combat between rival powers. Expanded multiplayer options include the ability to share units and resources with allies and to compete anonymously against other players of similar skill levels.
View : : :
25.
 
Re: Not worth it (yet)
Jul 3, 2002, 20:18
25.
Re: Not worth it (yet) Jul 3, 2002, 20:18
Jul 3, 2002, 20:18
 
You know $60 bucks isn't that much for a game when you think about how much games were sold for years ago... I recall PC games being 65+ all the time back the the days of DOS. And including consoles, I recall paying 80 dollars for Final Fantasy 3 on my SNES. So... 55 bucks isn't too bad for NWN or WC3 at all.

Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
anon@207.237
2.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
anon@68.35
4.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
anon@4.47
5.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
6.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
anon@24.102
3.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
anon@24.243
7.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
8.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
anon@66.67
9.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
10.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
anon@207.237
12.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
anon@207.134
13.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
15.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
anon@68.98
16.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
    Re: ermm...
anon@68.98
17.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
     Re: ermm...
21.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
anon@209.128
11.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
14.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
18.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
19.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
20.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
22.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
anon@193.11
24.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
anon@166.70
26.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
anon@166.70
23.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
anon@67.82
 25.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
 Re: Not worth it (yet)
28.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
30.
Jul 4, 2002Jul 4 2002
anon@142.173
31.
Jul 4, 2002Jul 4 2002
anon@166.70
32.
Jul 9, 2002Jul 9 2002
33.
Jul 10, 2002Jul 10 2002
34.
Jul 10, 2002Jul 10 2002
27.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
29.
Jul 4, 2002Jul 4 2002