Duke Nukem: Manhattan Project Demo

Sunstorm, ARUSH and 3D Realms have released a playable demo of Duke Nukem: Manhattan Project, their recent 3D platform action game, for download from the official site and 3D Realms. The 50.3 MB download contains the entire first episode called Rooftop Rebellion, complete with "3 sections, 4 powerful weapons, enemies such as PigCops, FemMechs and HoverMechs, 30 hidden nukes, 3 hot babes waiting to be rescued and one enormous boss fight high over the streets of New York City." Also, a 1.5 MB patch for the editor is available from 3D Realms to fix a problem introduced with the retail v1.01 patch last month.
View : : :
74.
 
Re: Duke
Jul 8, 2002, 06:00
anon@194.251
74.
Re: Duke Jul 8, 2002, 06:00
Jul 8, 2002, 06:00
anon@194.251
 
I think it's appalling when a developer comes here and people start flaming him (Or her...). Chances are that all you idiots out there flaming the game will be buying it when it hits the shops. Valve redid Half-Life when it was almost finished. Did it turn out rubbish? Some will argue that it did, but you'll find that most people would disagree. I doubt if George can confirm this, but I do have my suspicions about DNF using the new Unreal engine. Do you want a quality game, or do a want a rushed "BUY TEH GAME AN DOWNLAOD SI TOOHUNDRED PATCHSE TO SO SI WiLL VORK!!!" catastrophe? Why do I like 3D Realms? They haven't tried to cash in on me, the buyer and modder or the developers yet, unlike EA and Sierra. I really do hate it when a developer comes on a board, and then some retards direct all their time to bashing him. Some people actually appreciate talking to them about the progress of their current game and other things... From my exprience, developers are allowed to leave a little note on how things are going without breaking any NDAs.

Manhattan Project was well worth my money. The (old) Duke Nukem games were all I used to play with my old 486. They were fun then, and nothing has changed. The gameplay is still there and they've brought everything else up to today's standards. Yes I'm a raving fanboy, but I'm sure 3d Realms won't make me eat my words when DNF is released :D.
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
anon@24.206
2.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
anon@212.64
3.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
anon@64.217
4.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
anon@200.183
5.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
6.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
7.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
anon@209.31
8.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
10.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
11.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
9.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
12.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
13.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
14.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
anon@172.140
16.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
19.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
20.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
anon@172.163
17.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
15.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
anon@195.92
48.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
anon@151.198
18.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
anon@195.224
21.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
22.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
anon@12.250
24.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
anon@12.217
23.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
25.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
26.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
anon@24.206
27.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
31.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
33.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
anon@195.147
35.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
28.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
29.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
30.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
32.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
anon@217.34
34.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
anon@24.42
37.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
anon@213.120
36.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
anon@195.92
43.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
38.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
39.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
anon@172.139
40.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
41.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
anon@172.139
42.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
44.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
     Re: DNMP Demo
anon@172.150
45.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
      Re: DNMP Demo
anon@195.147
46.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
       DNF
49.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
        Re: DNF
anon@67.227
60.
Jul 4, 2002Jul 4 2002
        Re: DNF
anon@12.250
64.
Jul 6, 2002Jul 6 2002
      Re: DNMP Demo
anon@144.132
47.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
anon@67.227
54.
Jul 4, 2002Jul 4 2002
anon@68.100
50.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
anon@64.212
51.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
anon@62.6
52.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
anon@38.210
53.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
anon@12.255
55.
Jul 4, 2002Jul 4 2002
anon@213.120
59.
Jul 4, 2002Jul 4 2002
anon@12.255
61.
Jul 5, 2002Jul 5 2002
anon@68.100
58.
Jul 4, 2002Jul 4 2002
anon@132.203
62.
Jul 5, 2002Jul 5 2002
anon@12.73
63.
Jul 6, 2002Jul 6 2002
65.
Jul 6, 2002Jul 6 2002
anon@204.99
66.
Jul 6, 2002Jul 6 2002
anon@66.185
67.
Jul 6, 2002Jul 6 2002
68.
Jul 6, 2002Jul 6 2002
69.
Jul 7, 2002Jul 7 2002
anon@207.12
70.
Jul 7, 2002Jul 7 2002
anon@208.180
72.
Jul 7, 2002Jul 7 2002
anon@217.37
73.
Jul 7, 2002Jul 7 2002
 74.
Jul 8, 2002Jul 8 2002
  Re: Duke
anon@194.251
75.
Jul 8, 2002Jul 8 2002
anon@64.212
76.
Jul 8, 2002Jul 8 2002
anon@213.1
77.
Jul 8, 2002Jul 8 2002
anon@194.130
78.
Jul 8, 2002Jul 8 2002
anon@66.185