Duke Nukem: Manhattan Project Demo

Sunstorm, ARUSH and 3D Realms have released a playable demo of Duke Nukem: Manhattan Project, their recent 3D platform action game, for download from the official site and 3D Realms. The 50.3 MB download contains the entire first episode called Rooftop Rebellion, complete with "3 sections, 4 powerful weapons, enemies such as PigCops, FemMechs and HoverMechs, 30 hidden nukes, 3 hot babes waiting to be rescued and one enormous boss fight high over the streets of New York City." Also, a 1.5 MB patch for the editor is available from 3D Realms to fix a problem introduced with the retail v1.01 patch last month.
View : : :
68.
 
Why?
Jul 6, 2002, 23:53
68.
Why? Jul 6, 2002, 23:53
Jul 6, 2002, 23:53
 
Why are people so concerned with rattling the cage? It's not going to make a game come out any quicker.
In fact, when I read all the 'Give it up, 3DR' comments I realize that we as a 'fan-base' are a bunch of whining maggots.
I wonder if George Lucas bothers to even read his mail anymore.

Y'know something? I don't post too many comments on forums or in relation to game material. I pick moments to voice my words, and I think before I hit the submit button, is what I'm posting really worth it? Is what I am about to post going to be read and a response derived? Am I going to be considered a flamer for what I post?

Most 'fans' are (to my experience), poorly educated people who have such an empty life they are hitting refresh on websites in the hopes of new and breaking information. God forbid there is any news, they just HAVE to post their views on it? When honestly, they are nothing more than a single drop in a torrential sea of ignorance.
People, QUIT IT!
Leave the artists be!
I can only imagine what Raphael would have done had he had a 'fan-base' and a forum. Probably gone postal!
When it's done is when it's done, can't deal with it? Hey, it's your hour and they charge a pretty penny to hear you out.

Avatar 13202
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
anon@24.206
2.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
anon@212.64
3.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
anon@64.217
4.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
anon@200.183
5.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
6.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
7.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
anon@209.31
8.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
10.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
11.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
9.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
12.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
13.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
14.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
anon@172.140
16.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
19.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
20.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
anon@172.163
17.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
15.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
anon@195.92
48.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
anon@151.198
18.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
anon@195.224
21.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
22.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
anon@12.250
24.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
anon@12.217
23.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
25.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
26.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
anon@24.206
27.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
31.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
33.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
anon@195.147
35.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
28.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
29.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
30.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
32.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
anon@217.34
34.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
anon@24.42
37.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
anon@213.120
36.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
anon@195.92
43.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
38.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
39.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
anon@172.139
40.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
41.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
anon@172.139
42.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
44.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
     Re: DNMP Demo
anon@172.150
45.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
      Re: DNMP Demo
anon@195.147
46.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
       DNF
49.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
        Re: DNF
anon@67.227
60.
Jul 4, 2002Jul 4 2002
        Re: DNF
anon@12.250
64.
Jul 6, 2002Jul 6 2002
      Re: DNMP Demo
anon@144.132
47.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
anon@67.227
54.
Jul 4, 2002Jul 4 2002
anon@68.100
50.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
anon@64.212
51.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
anon@62.6
52.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
anon@38.210
53.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
anon@12.255
55.
Jul 4, 2002Jul 4 2002
anon@213.120
59.
Jul 4, 2002Jul 4 2002
anon@12.255
61.
Jul 5, 2002Jul 5 2002
anon@68.100
58.
Jul 4, 2002Jul 4 2002
anon@132.203
62.
Jul 5, 2002Jul 5 2002
anon@12.73
63.
Jul 6, 2002Jul 6 2002
65.
Jul 6, 2002Jul 6 2002
anon@204.99
66.
Jul 6, 2002Jul 6 2002
anon@66.185
67.
Jul 6, 2002Jul 6 2002
 68.
Jul 6, 2002Jul 6 2002
Why?
69.
Jul 7, 2002Jul 7 2002
anon@207.12
70.
Jul 7, 2002Jul 7 2002
anon@208.180
72.
Jul 7, 2002Jul 7 2002
anon@217.37
73.
Jul 7, 2002Jul 7 2002
74.
Jul 8, 2002Jul 8 2002
anon@194.251
75.
Jul 8, 2002Jul 8 2002
anon@64.212
76.
Jul 8, 2002Jul 8 2002
anon@213.1
77.
Jul 8, 2002Jul 8 2002
anon@194.130
78.
Jul 8, 2002Jul 8 2002
anon@66.185