Duke Nukem: Manhattan Project Demo

Sunstorm, ARUSH and 3D Realms have released a playable demo of Duke Nukem: Manhattan Project, their recent 3D platform action game, for download from the official site and 3D Realms. The 50.3 MB download contains the entire first episode called Rooftop Rebellion, complete with "3 sections, 4 powerful weapons, enemies such as PigCops, FemMechs and HoverMechs, 30 hidden nukes, 3 hot babes waiting to be rescued and one enormous boss fight high over the streets of New York City." Also, a 1.5 MB patch for the editor is available from 3D Realms to fix a problem introduced with the retail v1.01 patch last month.
View : : :
20.
 
Re: Duke Nukem? PPPFFFTTT!!!
Jul 1, 2002, 22:58
anon@172.163
20.
Re: Duke Nukem? PPPFFFTTT!!! Jul 1, 2002, 22:58
Jul 1, 2002, 22:58
anon@172.163
 
>This is stupid. We paid for that engine and it's >development. How is that any different than paying >employees to develop it for you? It was a 3D Realms engine >and it was only used in 3D Realms games or games we >licensed the engine to. So how was it not ours?

Did I say that the engine wasn't yours? I don't remember saying that. Did I say the engine isn't yours because that *kid* developed it? He developed it for you, I'M AWARE OF THAT. He developed it, NOT your company. I'm not disputing whether or not it's your property. We all know it's your property.

My point is, if you aren't able to finish Duke Nukem Forever in the next CENTURY, maybe you'd better hire some 15 year old kid to help you *again*.

Because, obviously, you are behind the power curve buddy. You'd better start implementing some EXTREME PROGRAMMING techniques and fast. In the time it has taken you to this point, you could have developed 10 engines, and you didn't even have to do that, you already licensed the engine, which means, *again*, you didn't do the work that was important in this project. Yet still, it's taken you much, much too long to complete your project.

I can't even believe I'm wasting my time responding to you. Anyway, what *exactly* are you doing posting comments here, shouldn't you be, I don't know, uh, WORKING ON THE GAME?

If you're going to post a comment, for god's sake, post a comment that makes a little sense.
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
anon@24.206
2.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
anon@212.64
3.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
anon@64.217
4.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
anon@200.183
5.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
6.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
7.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
anon@209.31
8.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
10.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
11.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
9.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
12.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
13.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
14.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
anon@172.140
16.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
19.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
 20.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
  Re: Duke Nukem? PPPFFFTTT!!!
anon@172.163
17.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
15.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
anon@195.92
48.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
anon@151.198
18.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
anon@195.224
21.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
22.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
anon@12.250
24.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
anon@12.217
23.
Jul 1, 2002Jul 1 2002
25.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
26.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
anon@24.206
27.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
31.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
33.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
anon@195.147
35.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
28.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
29.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
30.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
32.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
anon@217.34
34.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
anon@24.42
37.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
anon@213.120
36.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
anon@195.92
43.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
38.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
39.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
anon@172.139
40.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
41.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
anon@172.139
42.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
44.
Jul 2, 2002Jul 2 2002
     Re: DNMP Demo
anon@172.150
45.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
      Re: DNMP Demo
anon@195.147
46.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
       DNF
49.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
        Re: DNF
anon@67.227
60.
Jul 4, 2002Jul 4 2002
        Re: DNF
anon@12.250
64.
Jul 6, 2002Jul 6 2002
      Re: DNMP Demo
anon@144.132
47.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
anon@67.227
54.
Jul 4, 2002Jul 4 2002
anon@68.100
50.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
anon@64.212
51.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
anon@62.6
52.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
anon@38.210
53.
Jul 3, 2002Jul 3 2002
anon@12.255
55.
Jul 4, 2002Jul 4 2002
anon@213.120
59.
Jul 4, 2002Jul 4 2002
anon@12.255
61.
Jul 5, 2002Jul 5 2002
anon@68.100
58.
Jul 4, 2002Jul 4 2002
anon@132.203
62.
Jul 5, 2002Jul 5 2002
anon@12.73
63.
Jul 6, 2002Jul 6 2002
65.
Jul 6, 2002Jul 6 2002
anon@204.99
66.
Jul 6, 2002Jul 6 2002
anon@66.185
67.
Jul 6, 2002Jul 6 2002
68.
Jul 6, 2002Jul 6 2002
69.
Jul 7, 2002Jul 7 2002
anon@207.12
70.
Jul 7, 2002Jul 7 2002
anon@208.180
72.
Jul 7, 2002Jul 7 2002
anon@217.37
73.
Jul 7, 2002Jul 7 2002
74.
Jul 8, 2002Jul 8 2002
anon@194.251
75.
Jul 8, 2002Jul 8 2002
anon@64.212
76.
Jul 8, 2002Jul 8 2002
anon@213.1
77.
Jul 8, 2002Jul 8 2002
anon@194.130
78.
Jul 8, 2002Jul 8 2002
anon@66.185