UT 2003 Demo Info

There is some new information posted on the Epic Messageboards posted by Mark Rein (thanks Unreality) about plans for the Unreal Tournament 2003 demo:
1) What build version of UT2003 was being displayed at E3?

The latest one compiled just before E3. This was the first build I saw with a working Ion Cannon which is a ton of fun to use! What we showed on the show floor is essentially what we think the demo will be which consists of two DM maps (Antalus and Curse3), one Double Domination map (Suntemple), one CTF map (Chrome) and one Bombing Run map (Endagra). But, be warned, this could change. I don't believe there are any plans for a single player campaign for the demo.

2) What features were missing from the E3 build that will be added to the demo release?

The major ones I can think of would be the final server browser and stats tracking.

3) Approx how long has been allocated for feedback from the demo before finalising the retail code?

There is no particular amount of time being allocated for this. The response we get will determine how much needs to be done and whether or not we need to release another version of the demo before going final or not.

4) Are there any plans to release the server code to admins in advance of the demo release so that there will be some decent servers available to play on ?

No, not that I'm aware of. Once the demo is ready, it's ready and we don't want to be holding it back. I suspect it will take us a few more days after the Windows release to get the Linux server released.
View : : :
94.
 
Re: No subject
Jun 4, 2002, 00:00
94.
Re: No subject Jun 4, 2002, 00:00
Jun 4, 2002, 00:00
 
#85, DNF will hopefully be a good game though since it uses the Unreal engine you sound like a moron, which I am guessing you are anyway =P

I too quite like the realtime aspect of mapping in Doom3, sounds pretty good. Though I am still in love with that beast UEd =)

Date
Subject
Author
1.
May 28, 2002May 28 2002
anon@209.133
2.
May 28, 2002May 28 2002
3.
May 28, 2002May 28 2002
anon@209.133
4.
May 28, 2002May 28 2002
anon@213.84
89.
Jun 3, 2002Jun 3 2002
anon@141.156
91.
Jun 3, 2002Jun 3 2002
anon@211.28
5.
May 28, 2002May 28 2002
6.
May 28, 2002May 28 2002
7.
May 28, 2002May 28 2002
9.
May 28, 2002May 28 2002
8.
May 28, 2002May 28 2002
10.
May 28, 2002May 28 2002
11.
May 28, 2002May 28 2002
12.
May 28, 2002May 28 2002
anon@62.31
13.
May 28, 2002May 28 2002
15.
May 28, 2002May 28 2002
16.
May 28, 2002May 28 2002
     Re: No subject
18.
May 28, 2002May 28 2002
     Re: No subject
anon@209.133
19.
May 28, 2002May 28 2002
      Re: No subject
anon@208.180
21.
May 28, 2002May 28 2002
      Re: No subject
23.
May 28, 2002May 28 2002
      Re: No subject
24.
May 28, 2002May 28 2002
       Re: No subject
anon@209.133
20.
May 28, 2002May 28 2002
anon@194.82
14.
May 28, 2002May 28 2002
17.
May 28, 2002May 28 2002
anon@213.121
22.
May 28, 2002May 28 2002
anon@24.70
25.
May 28, 2002May 28 2002
26.
May 28, 2002May 28 2002
27.
May 28, 2002May 28 2002
anon@24.90
28.
May 28, 2002May 28 2002
29.
May 28, 2002May 28 2002
   Well
30.
May 29, 2002May 29 2002
    Re: Well
31.
May 29, 2002May 29 2002
     Re: Well
38.
May 29, 2002May 29 2002
      Re: Well
anon@151.205
39.
May 29, 2002May 29 2002
       Re: Well
anon@151.205
40.
May 29, 2002May 29 2002
        Re: Well
anon@66.66
41.
May 29, 2002May 29 2002
         Re: Well
anon@151.205
44.
May 29, 2002May 29 2002
          Re: Well
anon@66.66
45.
May 29, 2002May 29 2002
           Re: Well
anon@209.83
42.
May 29, 2002May 29 2002
         Re: Well
anon@63.120
43.
May 29, 2002May 29 2002
          Re: Well
anon@209.83
58.
May 30, 2002May 30 2002
          Re: Well
78.
Jun 2, 2002Jun 2 2002
          Re: Well
anon@66.185
79.
Jun 2, 2002Jun 2 2002
       Re: Well
anon@66.185
80.
Jun 2, 2002Jun 2 2002
        Re: Well
anon@24.188
34.
May 29, 2002May 29 2002
     Re: Well
anon@194.82
32.
May 29, 2002May 29 2002
anon@63.120
33.
May 29, 2002May 29 2002
    w00t
anon@12.158
35.
May 29, 2002May 29 2002
anon@12.8
36.
May 29, 2002May 29 2002
anon@209.83
37.
May 29, 2002May 29 2002
46.
May 29, 2002May 29 2002
anon@62.31
47.
May 29, 2002May 29 2002
anon@62.31
48.
May 29, 2002May 29 2002
anon@151.205
49.
May 29, 2002May 29 2002
anon@12.158
50.
May 30, 2002May 30 2002
anon@4.46
51.
May 30, 2002May 30 2002
anon@194.7
59.
May 30, 2002May 30 2002
60.
May 30, 2002May 30 2002
61.
May 30, 2002May 30 2002
62.
May 30, 2002May 30 2002
82.
Jun 2, 2002Jun 2 2002
anon@164.38
83.
Jun 2, 2002Jun 2 2002
     Re: No subject
anon@24.196
52.
May 30, 2002May 30 2002
anon@209.205
55.
May 30, 2002May 30 2002
anon@209.98
53.
May 30, 2002May 30 2002
anon@202.3
54.
May 30, 2002May 30 2002
anon@203.135
56.
May 30, 2002May 30 2002
anon@66.68
57.
May 30, 2002May 30 2002
anon@209.98
64.
May 31, 2002May 31 2002
anon@156.56
65.
May 31, 2002May 31 2002
anon@205.174
66.
May 31, 2002May 31 2002
71.
Jun 1, 2002Jun 1 2002
72.
Jun 1, 2002Jun 1 2002
anon@24.188
73.
Jun 2, 2002Jun 2 2002
74.
Jun 2, 2002Jun 2 2002
anon@193.198
75.
Jun 2, 2002Jun 2 2002
anon@217.228
76.
Jun 2, 2002Jun 2 2002
84.
Jun 3, 2002Jun 3 2002
77.
Jun 2, 2002Jun 2 2002
anon@66.185
63.
May 30, 2002May 30 2002
anon@24.188
67.
May 31, 2002May 31 2002
anon@24.188
68.
May 31, 2002May 31 2002
69.
Jun 1, 2002Jun 1 2002
anon@24.188
70.
Jun 1, 2002Jun 1 2002
anon@203.96
81.
Jun 2, 2002Jun 2 2002
anon@24.188
85.
Jun 3, 2002Jun 3 2002
anon@64.212
86.
Jun 3, 2002Jun 3 2002
93.
Jun 3, 2002Jun 3 2002
anon@65.66
87.
Jun 3, 2002Jun 3 2002
anon@208.186
88.
Jun 3, 2002Jun 3 2002
anon@24.188
90.
Jun 3, 2002Jun 3 2002
anon@211.28
92.
Jun 3, 2002Jun 3 2002
anon@211.28
 94.
Jun 4, 2002Jun 4 2002
 Re: No subject
95.
Jun 4, 2002Jun 4 2002
anon@66.25
96.
Jun 4, 2002Jun 4 2002
anon@65.66
97.
Jun 4, 2002Jun 4 2002
anon@80.0
99.
Jun 4, 2002Jun 4 2002
     Re: No subject
anon@205.136
100.
Jun 4, 2002Jun 4 2002
      Re: No subject
anon@213.105
101.
Jun 4, 2002Jun 4 2002
       Re: No subject
anon@211.28
102.
Jun 4, 2002Jun 4 2002
        Re: No subject
anon@66.185
98.
Jun 4, 2002Jun 4 2002
anon@205.136
103.
Jun 4, 2002Jun 4 2002
anon@63.231
104.
Jun 4, 2002Jun 4 2002
anon@209.98
105.
Jun 4, 2002Jun 4 2002
anon@63.86
106.
Jun 4, 2002Jun 4 2002
anon@66.95