Duke Nukem: Manhattan Project Gold

3D Realms' George Broussard updated his .plan with word that Duke Nukem: Manhattan Project, the 3D platform action game developed by Sunstorm Interactive, has gone gold. The game is expected to arrive on store shelves "in a couple of weeks."
View : : :
38.
 
Re: They had the
May 9, 2002, 14:45
38.
Re: They had the May 9, 2002, 14:45
May 9, 2002, 14:45
 
Actually, the Unreal engine doesn't have multiple iterations, like Q1 engine, Q2 engine, etc, it's a progressive release. I considered that fact many times. I think that it will utilize the latest Unreal engine technology, simply because it's built in. Still though, I'm sick of waiting. Even if I can open every door, shoot out every wall, hell, even if I can build custom sandcastles on the beach, that level of interaction isn't worth 5 years of "when it's done" PR crap. I know the bar they hoped to hit was "a new level of interactivity", but there is such a thing as overdoing it.


Date
Subject
Author
1.
May 8, 2002May 8 2002
anon@24.168
2.
May 8, 2002May 8 2002
3.
May 8, 2002May 8 2002
4.
May 8, 2002May 8 2002
15.
May 8, 2002May 8 2002
17.
May 8, 2002May 8 2002
7.
May 8, 2002May 8 2002
10.
May 8, 2002May 8 2002
anon@24.168
28.
May 9, 2002May 9 2002
anon@192.128
11.
May 8, 2002May 8 2002
anon@24.168
9.
May 8, 2002May 8 2002
anon@206.111
13.
May 8, 2002May 8 2002
anon@24.65
14.
May 8, 2002May 8 2002
anon@65.29
19.
May 9, 2002May 9 2002
21.
May 9, 2002May 9 2002
anon@65.42
5.
May 8, 2002May 8 2002
anon@63.193
6.
May 8, 2002May 8 2002
anon@209.31
8.
May 8, 2002May 8 2002
12.
May 8, 2002May 8 2002
16.
May 8, 2002May 8 2002
anon@24.208
18.
May 8, 2002May 8 2002
anon@24.208
20.
May 9, 2002May 9 2002
27.
May 9, 2002May 9 2002
22.
May 9, 2002May 9 2002
anon@12.250
23.
May 9, 2002May 9 2002
24.
May 9, 2002May 9 2002
25.
May 9, 2002May 9 2002
anon@64.109
26.
May 9, 2002May 9 2002
29.
May 9, 2002May 9 2002
30.
May 9, 2002May 9 2002
31.
May 9, 2002May 9 2002
33.
May 9, 2002May 9 2002
36.
May 9, 2002May 9 2002
32.
May 9, 2002May 9 2002
anon@24.208
52.
May 13, 2002May 13 2002
anon@24.62
34.
May 9, 2002May 9 2002
35.
May 9, 2002May 9 2002
37.
May 9, 2002May 9 2002
 38.
May 9, 2002May 9 2002
 Re: They had the
39.
May 9, 2002May 9 2002
anon@130.86
44.
May 11, 2002May 11 2002
anon@12.226
40.
May 9, 2002May 9 2002
anon@207.67
41.
May 9, 2002May 9 2002
anon@207.67
42.
May 9, 2002May 9 2002
 ..
anon@65.42
43.
May 9, 2002May 9 2002
  Re: ..
anon@216.254
48.
May 12, 2002May 12 2002
   Re: ..
45.
May 11, 2002May 11 2002
anon@66.176
49.
May 12, 2002May 12 2002
anon@12.228
50.
May 13, 2002May 13 2002
56.
May 15, 2002May 15 2002
anon@67.251
59.
May 16, 2002May 16 2002
55.
May 15, 2002May 15 2002
anon@67.251
46.
May 11, 2002May 11 2002
anon@66.176
47.
May 11, 2002May 11 2002
anon@64.213
60.
May 29, 2002May 29 2002
anon@66.176
61.
Jul 25, 2002Jul 25 2002
anon@66.176
51.
May 13, 2002May 13 2002
anon@209.20
53.
May 15, 2002May 15 2002
anon@64.212
54.
May 15, 2002May 15 2002
anon@130.86
57.
May 15, 2002May 15 2002
anon@209.20
58.
May 15, 2002May 15 2002
anon@24.208