Noticing I am a self-confessed sucker for neat Flash and Shockwave games on the Internet, the folks at canDo games realized this was an opportunity for some log-rolling, and sent along a special Blue's News version of their game called BallsUp (Shockwave required). The game is a shareware dealie with a full version for purchase (we are not part of the revenue stream/puddle for this, btw), but the Blue's News level is part of the free evaluation portion of the game. Enjoy!
Story of the Day: Life Inside Tall Tin Can in Utah Is All Mars.
NY Times free registration required. Thanks Jonathan C. Forster.
Story of the Day II: Drugs Allegedly Found in Barry's Car.
Guess old Marion is gearing up for another reelection bid?
Weird Science: Thumbs Are the New Fingers for GameBoy Youth.
Thanks loonybomber.
Wild Science: Japanese Scientist Makes Frog Eyes.
Thanks EvilToast. "You Nexus? I design Nexus eyes."
Todd, why don't you read up on Darwin before you start spouting this stuff, 'k? You seem to be lost on the subtleties (and no so subtleties) of natural selection.Actually my science class just covered this, I'm not spouting. This was a critical part of the theory.
His theory was of natural selection. When he wrote about evolution there was little known about genes then. HIs theory was all about survival of the fittest, such as Hairy Animals would survive better in the cold then non hairy ones, and therefor the non hairy animals would die off, while the hairy ones flurished. I do agree with you though, that in order for the thumbs to mutate the gameboy generation would have to pass on its mutation to its offspring, and I highly doubt that this thumb mutation is a mutation at all.Thats right, that is another important part of the theory. According to what my science class just covered, the two key things are natural selection which is what you pointed out, and random mutations which is what I initally mentioned.
"The use of gadgets such as mobile phones and GameBoys has caused a physical mutation in young people's hands, according to a British Sunday newspaper."
physical mutation != genetic mutation
I agree that it's misleading (and misused) language, though.